Legal Aid Commission
Killers on wheels
Motor accidents are a frequent occurrence in our daily lives. It is
this frequency that has made them a "trivial fact" of urban life and
left this burning issue gravely under addressed and neglected. Perhaps
many of us are unaware that criminal negligence has become the number 1
killer in Sri Lanka today. While the number of fatalities have ceased in
the warfront, the highway death and injury toll continues to tick over.
According to Traffic Police statistics, out of a total number of
30,420 accidents reported in 2008, 2,157 were fatal.
They also reveal that motorcycles, lorries and private buses have
caused the majority of them, the numbers being 674, 349 and 232
respectively.
The traffic police states that the majority of deaths were caused to
pedestrians; over 625 persons being killed out of a total of 2,312
killers last year.
The statistics are on the rise with little or no action being taken
to remedy the problem.
The medical care for accident victims, damage to property and
vehicles involved in road accidents last year was estimated by
authorities to have cost US $ 105 million to the government; nearly 1%
of the GDP. Thus it is now emerging as a national health issue. These
facts are testimony to the lacunae in traffic management methods and law
enforcement in the country. The time is ripe for sufficient attention to
be given to the issue by relevant management authorities and the public.
The Traffic Police identified reckless driving, negligence,
indiscipline, ignorance and driving under the influence of liquor and
violating traffic rules as the main reasons for accidents on roads. They
have launched several awareness programs among drivers and
schoolchildren to promote road safety. It has also deployed traffic
patrols from time to time to detect road violence. However, these
measures have proved ineffective and inadequate. Stringent laws are
required to deter people from becoming reckless on roads.
Legal Provisions
The traffic police have been given the legal power to arrest drivers
for certain road offences such as forged licences and national identity
cards, driving without number plates and driving under the influence of
liquor under the Motor Traffic Act No. 08 of 2009 (amendment).However
drivers responsible for fatal accidents tend to be dealt with leniency.
Drunk drivers are usually being fined about Rs.1500 and prosecutions are
rare.
According to Section 272 of the Penal Code, the punishment prescribed
for endangering life or causing hurt or injury by rash and negligent
driving is a term of imprisonment which may extend to six months or
fine.
Many activists have pressed for a longer term of imprisonment for
criminally negligent driving to offer some form of a deterrent. The Law
Commission of India has recommended a 10 year term of imprisonment for
deaths caused by rash and negligent drivers. The Sri Lankan Law should
also be developed along the same lines.
In Sri Lanka, drivers are allowed to take the wheel even after being
involved in a fatal accident. It is suggested that the driving licence
of such persons be withheld for a considerable period of time as
punishment. Insurance companies are a major actor in litigation of this
nature. In most instances aggrieved parties fail to involve Insurance
companies as defendants, resulting in them failing to obtain adequate
compensation from the defendants. In addition to the above issues, the
grounds of eligibility for compensation meant for aggrieved parties
should also be expanded.
Supporting victims of criminal negligence
The majority of victims of road accidents are underprivileged persons
who are incapable of approaching the justice system.
Furthermore, they are unable to afford expert evidence from medical
personnel required in cases of this nature. The Legal Aid Commission
seeks to introduce a special unit, whereby aggrieved parties who are
unable to press for legal action due to financial difficulties, can
obtain legal advice and representation in such litigation free of
charge.
The Victims Protection Bill before Parliament would assist the LAC
projected preventive measures.
With the law in place, Sri Lanka also requires new technology like
speed-cameras and video systems to control traffic. Installing Close
Circuit Television cameras (CCTV) in junctions and other places is one
of the vital tools that can be used to control speeding and ignoring
signal lights.
The police is keen on taking action to install the CCTV cameras on
traffic lights in the city. How successful the implementation process
will be, only time can tell.
The Government needs to allocate more funds to improve infrastructure
to make roads more conducible and safe for both pedestrians and
motorists. Adequate street lighting, pedestrian crossings, overhead road
crossings, guarded railway crossings, are essential in this regard.
The process is in fact cumbersome and difficult. Yet with effective
planning and commitment it should be implemented as it involves the
safety of the masses of the country, which the state has a
responsibility to protect.
Upekha Wedage,
Public Legal
Awareness Unit
Wellawaya Legal Aid centre will greatly benefit poor - District
Judge
Despite national and international efforts the Wellawaya Judicial
Zone remains one of the poorest areas in Sri Lanka and as former
Magistrate in the area I am personally aware the indigent litigants
could not even find the bus fare to come long distances to the courts
and gave up their struggle to seek justice due to abject poverty. The
decision of the LAC to establish a legal aid centre in Wellawaya with
the assistance of UNDP access to justice program is a salutary step",
said District Judge, Chinthaka Srinath Gunasekera. He praised the
efforts made by Wellawaya District Judge I.R. de Silva to open a legal
aid centre in the Wellawaya Courts"
Moneragala District Judge Chinthaka Srinath Gunasekera cutting
the ribbon to declare open the Wellawaya Legal Aid centre of the
Legal Aid Commission. Wellawaya District Judge I.R. de Silva and
LAC Chairman S.S. Wijeratne are also in the picture (Right). A
section of the gathering. Picture by W.H. Chandradasa |
LAC Chairman, S.S. Wijeratne said that equal access to justice to all
promised in UN documents and our Constitution is meaningless unless
practical steps are taken to serve the poor at the closest proximity at
no cost.
During the past few years the Government and UNDP have supported this
effort for the Law to benefit everyone but there still remains a long
distance to go before we can say justice is accessible to everyone in
this island.
LAC Director-General Justice Hector S Yapa detailed various services
provided to the poor by the LAC and noted that the absence of a single
Labour Tribunal in the Moneragala district which is one of the largest
in the island should be rectified soon.
Senior Attorney-at-Law B.H.S. Jayasekera from Moneragala appreciated
the decision of the LAC in establishing the Wellawaya Centre as poor
litigants have to spend over Rs. 100 on bus fare alone to come to
Moneragala. Further, three police Divisions in Wellawaya, Buttala and
Thanamalvila generated a high volume of litigations where a majority of
them were poor.
Newly appointed Wellawaya LAC Legal Officer Lakmali Wickramasinghe
delivered the vote of thanks.
Questions and Answers
Question of nationality
Question - I was employed as a Kangany in an estate in Badulla
for five years. I was posted as a Labourer to a Division. I did not go
and work as a labourer. I appealed to cancel the posting. The management
refused to do it. I have filed action in the Labour Tribunal alleging
constructive termination of employment. The employer has raised a legal
objection that my case cannot be maintained as I am an Indian National.
Please advise me?
P.Anthony, Badulla
Answer - A Labour Tribunal is not required to go into the
question of Nationality. It has to decide on the Justifiability or
otherwise of termination of employment of a workman. The High Court in
appeal has recently decided that the Tribunal cannot go into the
question of Nationality.
Decisions of the Wages Boards exhibited in workplace
Question - I am told that decisions of the Wages Boards should
be exhibited in the workplace for the employees to know their
entitlements. Is this position correct? Please advise.
M. Ajith, Minuwangoda
Answer - Yes. It should be exhibited. The notice showing the
decisions should be substantially in Form II under Regulation 25 of the
Ordinance.
Pre-mature termination of contract
Question - I was employed as a Field Officer by an NGO for two
years commencing from January 01, 2008 to December 31, 2009 at a monthly
salary of Rs.30,000/= My contract does not say that it will be extended
for a further period as determined by the Employer. I am now 53 years
and took up this job leaving the other job on the understanding that I
could work till the 31st of December 2009. I submitted my interim report
last week. My presentation was appreciated by those present at the
meeting.
The Program Manager suddenly informed me that my services will not be
required after the 30th of September 2009. To-date I have not been found
fault with my work. Neither did I receive any letters from my employer
reprimanding me for any lapse. For that matter no letters have been
issued to me calling for explanation with regard to my work. On the
other hand I have been commended for my work. I seek your advice in the
matter.
Sent by email
Answer - Your contract is for a period of two years. By
September 31, 2009 you will be completing 19 months with your employer.
You have three more months. According to your contract, your contract
does not say that your contract will be extended for a further period.
You will therefore be entitled to claim compensation up to the end of
your contract.
Since you have not been given any reasons for your termination in
writing, you could seek relief before -
(a) The Commissioner of Labour under the Termination of Employment
(Special Provisions) Act No.45 of 1971.
(b) Before a Labour Tribunal
You should apply to the Commissioner of Labour or to the Labour
Tribunal before December 31, 2009 for relief.
Period of validity of travel documents
Question - My son is a frequent overseas traveller. Please let
me know the period of validity of travel documents as I need to advise
my son regarding this. Please advise through your Legal Aid Page.
M. Ibrahim, Galle
Answer - Official Passports and Ordinary Passports are valid
for 10 years at the time of first issue. No Passport is valid for more
than 10 years from the date of first issue.
On the expiry of 10 years from the date of issue, or if there are no
pages for visa endorsements, a new passport should be obtained. There is
no provision in law to attach additional pages to Passports.
Emergency Certificates are issued valid for two years at the time of
first issue and can be validated for a further maximum period of two
years. No Emergency Certificate can be validated for more than two years
at a time.
Identity Certificates are issued valid for five years at the time of
first issue. It cannot be validated for a period in excess of five
years. It would be preferable, as a rule of thumb, for Missions to
validate Identity Certificates and if necessary restrict the number of
journeys.
Punishment meted out to drunkards
Question - I live with my family in a quiet residential area.
However there is a drunkard person who utters filthy words when passing
our house.
Kindly let me know whether such persons can be punished? Your kind
reply is solicited.
P. Cedric,
Minuwangoda
Answer - Under the Penal Code - Section 488 whoever, in a
state of intoxication, appear in any public place or in any place which
it is a trespass in him to enter, and there conducts himself in such a
manner as to cause annoyance to any person, shall be punished with
simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one month, or with a
fine which may extend to one hundred rupees, or with both.
|