Elections have demonstrated people power
Dhanapala WEERASEKERA
While the UNP and the JVP continue to live in the past era, when
voters decisions could be swayed by promises of individual benefits,
such as cheaper and more abundant food, and a wide range of personal
benefits, better life and fast solutions to almost every problem they
faced, the voters in general have matured into a powerful democratic
force, whose actions and assessments are based on issues of political
and national importance.
In such a situation, the criticisms levelled at the Government and
puerile platform utterances by the Opposition leaders and their
spokesmen were taken as insults to their intelligence by the voters who,
decades after independence have progressed to a position equal to
politically advanced nations, where voters decide not on individuals nor
on temporary personal benefits, but on the importance to their nation
and its people.
Analysis
The leaders of the opposition never seem to learn. Their analysis of
the election results shows that they still consider our general public
as simpletons who would swallow any jargon they utter and is published
in the media. The UNP tries to cover up their historic defeat by their
calculation that all who did not vote at the elections are
anti-government.
Casting the vote |
The correct assessment is that the vast majority of voters who chose
freely, plus those who are generally supporters of the Government front
parties voted together and of the voters who generally vote for the UNP,
a large section decided to vote in support of the Government’s
nationally important policies and achievements. A large number of UNPers
traditionally loyal to the UNP felt it anti-national to vote against the
Government, but live in hope that their grand old party will recover
with a better leadership, refrained from voting.
Attention
As such the vast majority of non voters are really against the
present UNP but do not want to cast a vote against the President’s
leadership and the Government’s policies.
The latest effort to draw some attention to their fading image is
pathetic to say the least. The UNP leadership wants a debate on the
question of a ceasefire being pushed by pro LTTE factions, and attempts
to project their party leader as a stalwart against any ceasefire
despite the governments and the military leaders assurance that there is
and will never be a ceasefire with the LTTE, ignoring the fact that the
government has decided to refrain from use of heavy arms and air strikes
quite obviously and justifiably to prevent harm to the civilians trapped
in the small area left to the LTTE.
These are the same leaders whose position before the defeat of the
LTTE was in favour of ceasefire agreements, and who granted ceasefire
periods at a heavy cost to the country. These same people previously
blamed the Government for using heavy arms and risking the lives of
civilians. MP Jayalath Jayawardana joins in, reminding the public that
it was he who first requested a settlement of problems by discussion and
was accused of being pro LTTE.
He either does not understand, or actually had pro LTTE sympathies,
and does not see the great difference between discussing and settling
the problem when the LTTE was in domination, and the Tamils were under
LTTE control and unable to make any decisions outside the approval of
the LTTE and the present Government’s stand, that discussions and a
final settlement will be definitely achieved by discussing with the
Tamils, as well as other interested or affected representatives when
Tamils are free to express their views and genuine Tamil leaders not
subservient to the LTTE are able to represent them.
Dependant
The UNP and the almost defunct JVP state that the Government’s
victory was unduly dependant on the anti-terrorist victories, ignoring
the truth that the victories were possible due to the President’s firm
decisions and correct leadership and confidence placed in the fighting
Forces unlike many of our past leaders whose vacillation and
interference with military strategies to suit national and international
pro LTTE lobby.
The UNP forgets the fact that the UNP election victories in the early
days of independence were mainly due to projecting the image of the
first Prime Minister as Father of the Nation and ignoring the several
other leaders of other parties and nationalities who contributed to
gaining our independence.
Contributions
Our people in general are grateful to leaders of the past and still
remember them for their national contributions though party politics has
in many cases split even these memories. How then is it that the UNP
expects people not to appreciate the great achievement in recent history
by our present leader President Rajapaksa? Does it surprise them that
the people laughed off and continue to ridicule the election claims by
the UNP leaders? Some of them are worth repeating and answering.
In the initial stage of the final military push, the UNP’s stance was
that the President should agree to the ceasefire demanded by the foreign
powers. Not a word was ever mentioned in favour of the military
offensive. Most public utterances by the UNP were in support of the
foreign power’s demand for a ceasefire and strengthened the claim of
such powers and their insinuations that there was anti Tamil violence by
the Army.
When publicity was given to the massive continuing victories of the
Forces, the UNP leader pipped in with a statement that most of the
powerful arms used by the Forces had been imported during his
government. He tried to get some credit for himself from the victories.
The people however question why with such good arms which he claims were
imported by his regime, he preferred a ceasefire and discussions instead
of using such arms to fight the LTTE? His next accusation in the face of
the victories and operations which resulted in the greatest ever release
of hostages, was that the Government did not consult him or the
Parliament about the final battle. He might as well have asked why we
did not give prior warning to the LTTE.
The Government and the President are faced with an opposition led by
the UNP, which does not even support the emergency regulations. The
people have not forgotten the killing by the LTTE of the Special
Intelligence Unit due to the loose political folly of the UNP when they
came into power.
Lobby
The UNP next wants the statistics of the numbers killed, knowing that
such figures are just what the pro LTTE local and foreign lobby wants.
He hopes that even a little of the credit earned by the President and
the Forces will be reduced, and he too will be able to earn some little
credit for himself too from the pro LTTE factions and the public hoping
that they have forgotten the UNP history of human rights at Batalanda.
The people voted for, and continue to support the President and his
Government not only due to the victories, but because they support his
non vacillating leadership, unchanging anti LTTE stance, the strength to
stand up for the interests of our country and all its people in the face
of pressures of local and foreign powers.
Unwavering
His unwavering position of ‘country and its people first’ has won him
the people’s support. It is very significant that the bulk of the votes
received by the Government nominees are from the sections of the people
most affected by the rising prices and financial stresses caused mainly
by the global financial crisis and the war. The postal votes of public
servants, the voters of rural areas, urban areas and even the middle
class areas of Colombo voted for the Government.
They placed national interests above their own temporary shortcomings
and problems, while the UNP’s votes were mainly from among the sections
of people who were upper middle class and upper class and either were
not affected by prices, or were those not prepared to make any
sacrifices for the future of the nation. This is very clearly seen by
the results in the Colombo city.
The manner in which the anti LTTE fight has been conducted and the
manner in which he has placed the national interests before all else has
created a strong confidence that despite present and even future
hardships, they and the future of the country is secure under the
leadership of the President. |