The mythical ‘racist’ narrative
Shenali Waduge
Mass media have a power far more than governments to tilt public
opinion to their line of thinking using a plethora of modes at both
international and local levels with a dangerous ability to make
mountains out of molehills. The scope of their manipulation is
phenomenal and profit driven. Humans are sensitive to emotional
blackmail and fall victim to either mind conditioning or the human
weakness of money and power. Media stands guilty of portraying
situations in worse scenarios for its own gains and is largely
accountable for creating tense situations in a country. Sri Lanka is
currently facing a combination of these onslaughts. Media can create
“victims” and then engage in efforts to slander the target, a combined
effort with external forces. Balanced content is nil. Sanity is what is
required to sieve the lies from the truth. The current issue is the
projection of Sinhalese Buddhists or Buddhist Sinhalese as “racists” –
let us see how fair or truthful this is.
When news media control what we see, hear, think, learn and know – it
is a dangerous situation. “You know very well, and the stupid Americans
know equally well, that we control their government, irrespective of who
sits in the White House. You see, I know it and you know it that no
American President can be in a position to challenge us even if we do
the unthinkable. What can they (Americans) do to us? We control
congress, we control the media, we control show biz, and we control
everything in America. In America you can criticize God, but you can’t
criticize Israel…” Israeli spokeswoman, Tzipora Menache said. This is
because six Jewish companies control 96 per cent of the world’s media.
The situation in Sri Lanka
There is a proud history that the Sinhela race should not feel shy
about which secularism and liberals cannot simply write off, undermine,
laugh at or legislatively remove simply because it does not conform to
their ideology. Nevertheless, the growing tension is that an increasing
lobby is galvanizing the theory that the majority is discriminating
against the minorities. A lot of effort is been given to knock this
theory into acceptance.
Historical evidence cannot be ignored. The prehistoric settlement in
Sri Lanka is proved in the discovery of the oldest human found in
Pathirajawela in deep South of Sri Lanka who had lived 20,000 years
before the Neanderthal inhabited earth. Pathirajawela also exposed a
flake and stone tool industry belonging to 125,000 to 75,000 BCE. The
second oldest human was found in Bundala again in the deep South. The
third oldest Lankan human was found in Fa-Hien the largest natural cave
in South Asia known as Pahiyangala which can accommodate over 3,000
humans. From 123,000 BCE it was in 546 BC that the Sivu-Hela (Simhala
which became Sinhela) tribes of Yaksha, Naga, Deva and Raksha tribes
lived. This was the origins of the civilization of the hela people (Sinhela)
far before the arrival of King Vijaya in 543BC. http://www.srilankaheritages.com/oldest-human.html
Sri Lanka’s history is chronicled from 5th century BC led by
Sinhalese Buddhist kings. There were invasions and incursions of Cholas
and Pandyas but these were defeated. Elara (235 BC – 161 BC) ruled in
Anuradhapura more or less as a Sinhalese kingdom. There is no Tamil
archeological evidence to prove that a long standing Tamil civilization
existed in Sri Lanka.
Violation of ethics of journalism
The Muslims in Sri Lanka have different origins. A vast majority of
them have their origins in South India which explains why they spoke and
still speak Tamil. Muslims that settled in Sri Lanka never had a
linguistic connection to Arabs and began settling in Sri Lanka only
after the 10th century.
The Dutch brought the Vellalas from South India for tobacco
cultivation in the 1700s while the British brought the Indian Tamils as
plantation workers in 1800s because the Sinhalese refused to work as
coolies in tea plantations that were originally land belonging to the
Kandyan peasantry but grabbed from them under the draconian Waste Land
Ordinance which was enacted in 1840. Under this law all lands for which
there was no proof of ownership or possession were regarded as waste
land or Crown land. Vast acreage was thus grabbed by the British
Colonial government without taking into consideration the customary
ownership rights of the Kandyan people. This bred dissatisfaction among
the Kandyan people which was the major cause for the 1848 rebellion.
Of late, the media has become a platform to denigrate the Sinhalese
and ridicule Buddhism. As an example a pro-Christian website run by
exiled local journalists paid from foreign funds publishes everything
that serves this objective. Its article headings over the past few weeks
clearly show their bias: “Bhikku brigade”, “Buddhist Taliban”, “Attack
on Muslims”, “Extremists BBS Majoritarian virus”, “Hamuruduwane
Booruwane”, “Sinhala-Buddhist nationalism”, “bigotry of Sinhala
Buddhism”, “haunted by the Mahawansa”, … the labels that Sinhalese
Buddhists have been tagged with that media enthusiastically promotes are
many. It is a gross violation of ethics of journalism.
Before writing off the Sinhalese Buddhists and believing every word
that transpires over the media it is necessary to engage in a content
analysis of all the English language newspapers in this country. It is
evident that the main feature writers are more or less the same in all
the newspapers and saying the same things over and over again and media
gives only space for them and it is their views that monopolize what
people are made to read and form their opinion upon. There is no room or
opportunity extended for alternate views.
The objective is always to make the readers believe that the
Sinhalese Buddhists are the cause of all the ills, the source of all the
trouble and disharmony between races and religions, and that their
numbers in the country (70 per cent) prevent adequate space to
minorities from exercising their rights. This is in realistic terms, far
from the truth.
Who are the real minorities?
On a broadsheet the minorities statistically in religious terms are
Hindus, Islam, Christians while ethnically the minorities will be the
Tamils, Muslims and Burghers. Yet, in reality when we take the capital
Colombo it is these minority ethnic groups and the minority religions
that rule – they control much of the commercial sector, they have a
monopoly over the wholesale trade, they hold prime immovable property in
greater Colombo and form the greater composition of elite in terms of
the monetary power they hold. It is for these primary reasons that
politicians end up gravitating towards them, for power and money are
fatal attractions. It is through these influences that a lot of
unwarranted and irregularities have taken place often bypassing
customary laws.
What have the minorities not been given in Sri Lanka? Do Buddhists
have these privileges in other nations as minorities themselves? Do
Muslims not have three public holidays, do Christians not have two
public holidays plus 52 Sundays for Sabbath? While Hindus have three
public holidays places of worship for all religions abound in Sri Lanka.
Sri Lanka issues stamps in honour of all the faiths every year – which
is unique and sets Sri Lanka apart from all the countries in the world.
Not a single Muslim or Christian country has issued a stamp in honour of
the Buddha.
Are the minorities not given recognition in the national flag? Is it
not on account of the unmonitored freedoms that we are faced with a
situation of conversions to the Abrahamic religions and innumerable
groups of faith healers all over the island spreading the “Word”?
Let’s be candid. The ever vociferous Christian promoters of “freedom
of religion” slogans cry “freedom” so long as they can inflict their
religious beliefs on others. Sri Lanka has not forgotten the work of
Catholic Action and the secret societies that continue to prevail and
when India’s own media is owned by various Church bodies there is little
surprise at how media is slowly getting India to self-Balkanize India.
The truth is that the role of Sinhalese Buddhists is confined to only
bringing politicians to power.
Buddhists have reacted to these rapidly developing scenarios that
they have identified as similar to those brewing in other parts of the
world. These potential threats to Buddhists and Buddhism in Sri Lanka
have been clearly articulated but media has purposely blocked giving
publicity to the fears and warnings of future trouble expressed by the
Buddhists.
? Is the advocacy for rights of animals no longer accepted in a
country that for over a period of two millennium protected animals from
man’s inhumanity under the benign rule of Buddhist Kings?
Should people coming from non-Buddhist religious backgrounds be
allowed to have the last word on how this country should preserve and
protect animals and see to their welfare through appropriate legislative
reform?
Is it wrong for Buddhists to object to animal sacrifice when the
founder of the religion Gauthama the Buddha vehemently condemned it as
an evil practice and Sinhalese Buddhist Kings prohibited Animal
Sacrifice in their Kingdoms following Buddhist injunctions against such
practice until the fall of the Kandyan Kingdom in 1815?
Why did the media not speculate as to the sudden demand for halal
labels when purchase of foods and items without halal certificates/logos
had taken place for centuries – moreover with GMOs which are legally not
to be tested before release to market what is the guaranteed that foods
we eat have not been crossed with pigs? So much of food-modification is
taking place around us all to the profit of the food industry. When
nations are banning burqa’s and niqabs and citing the reasons of
unnecessary segregation disuniting people why is it when similar
sentiments are expressed in Sri Lanka the media goes to town to again
project the notion of anti-Muslim.
Are the Buddhists only good enough to be sacrificed by the LTTE so
that all others can live safely? Was it not 99.9 per cent of the
Sinhalese Buddhist soldiers that died in defending the nation and is it
not why the people do not want a similar instance where another lot of
Sinhala Buddhists may end up in graves?
Given that 74 per cent Sinhalese Buddhists are difficult to
annihilate we realize the foreign driven multipronged efforts to break
up the foundations of Buddhist nationalism being the last line of
defense. This is what Myanmar is currently facing in a fierce
competition between the two major Abrahamic faiths for world domination
through control of the world’s people and territories.
Do people seriously think that the Sinhalese Buddhists would create
situations where it is they who will end up dying?
In reality is it not the Sinhalese Buddhists who are in real terms in
the minority? As against 77million Tamils – 72million Tamils who live in
Tamil Nadu alone the world has only 14.8million Sinhalese (of which less
than 300,000 are Sinhalese Christians). Efforts must be made to protect
the Sinhalese Buddhists as an indigenous species on account of the
language and the ethnicity of the Sinhalese being spoken only in Sri
Lanka.
Religious freedoms worldwide
Studies show that in a Muslim-majority nation there is a high level
of government restrictions. Ironically, in these very Muslim nations
Muslims themselves are often the victims of religious intolerance. It’s
a battle over what type of Shariah law should be enacted, or who holds
the reins of power in government – as Islam and its practice rests on
the leaders that call the shots.
Afghanistan - an Islamic Republic….The sacred religion of Islam shall
be the religion of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan….No law shall
contravene the tenets and provisions of the holy religion of Islam in
Afghanistan
Argentina - Article 2 of the Constitution of Argentina reads: “The
Federal Government supports the Roman Catholic Apostolic religion.”
Article 14 guarantees all the inhabitants of the Nation the right “to
profess freely their religion.”
Canada - In most parts of Canada there is a Catholic education system
alongside the secular “public” education system. They all run on
Catholic principles and include religious activities and instruction as
a matter of course. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which
is entrenched in the Constitution, states in the preamble that Canada
“is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the
rule of law.”
Freedom of religion
Denmark - Section 4 in the Constitution of Denmark: “The Evangelical
Lutheran Church shall be the Established Church of Denmark, and, as
such, it shall be supported by the State.”
Finland - National churches of Finland, the Evangelical Lutheran
Church of Finland and the Finnish Orthodox Church have a status
protected by law. The special legal position of the Evangelical Lutheran
Church of Finland is also codified in the constitution of Finland.
Malaysia - Islam is the official state religion and the Constitution
of Malaysia provides for limited freedom of religion, notably placing
control upon the ‘propagation’ of religion other than Islam to Muslims
Saudi Arabia - Islamic theocratic monarchy in which Islam is the
official religion; the law requires that all Saudi citizens be Muslims
Turkey – 99.0 per cent of the Turkish population is Muslim of whom a
majority belong to the Sunni branch of Islam. The constitution
explicitly states that they cannot become involved in the political
process (by forming a religious party. No party can claim that it
represents a form of religious belief. Turkey, like France, prohibits by
law the wearing of religious headcover and theo-political symbolic
garments for both genders in government buildings, schools, and
universities.
United Kingdom (UK) - provisions of the Act of Settlement 1701 which
ensures that no Catholic shall ever be the monarch of the United
Kingdom, nor shall they be married to one. Religious education is
mandated in state schools based on a syllabus reflecting the country’s
Christian traditions.
Britain is a predominantly Christian country with two established,
the Church of England (COE), the mother church of the Anglican Communion
and state church in England and the Presbyterian Church of Scotland.
The Church of Scotland is Presbyterian while the Church of England is
Anglican (Episcopalian). The former is a national church guaranteed by
law to be separate from the state, while the latter is a
state-established church and any major changes to doctrine, liturgy, or
structure must have parliamentary approval.
Maldives – the supposed paradise for over 60,000 tourists annually
are given arrival cards giving lists of prohibited items (materials
contrary to Islam). Saudi Arabia and Maldives both 100 per cent Muslim
nations. The 2008 constitution adopted states “non-Muslim may not become
a citizen of the Maldives”. In Maldives too the Wahhabi Islamic pattern
is increasing. Women in the early 1990s did not wear the black burqa and
men with long beards – but that is now seen increasing. Many say that
these attire changes come with an exchange of remunerations both cash
and kind!
Iran’s constitution recognizes four religions whose status is
formally protected – Zoroastrianism, Judaism, Christianity and Islam.
In Egypt, a 2006 judgement by the Supreme Administrative Council
demarcated recognized religions (Islam, Christianity, Judaism) and other
religious beliefs – other religious affiliations were prohibited which
means they including Bahai’s are denied rights of citizenship in their
country – they cannot obtain ID cards, birth certificates, death
certificates, marriage or divorce certificates, passports, they cannot
be employed, educated, treated in public hospitals or vote!!!
As far as religious freedoms go when it is forbidden for Muslims to
convert from Islam to another religion Islam encourages conversions of
non-Muslims to Islam.
When the Vatican speaks of freedom of religion, equality of faiths –
the Vatican will not consider ever putting a non-Catholic structure
inside the Vatican City – where is the logic?
Let’s look at the laws in some of these countries.
In France and Belgium students in state schools and government
workers cannot wear “conspicuous religious symbols” – forbids Islamic
headscarf, Sikh turban, large Christian crosses, Jewish yarmulke. Both
countries ban people from publicly wearing full-face veils. France also
forbids people from wearing any headgear in official identity document
photos.
The body covering burqa and face-covering niqabs in public was banned
unanimously in France in April 2011 claiming 6.5million Muslims were not
integrating into French society – the fine is €150 ($215).
Those that force others to cover their faces will be subject to a
fine of €30,000 ($43,000) and a year in jail. Human Rights Watch claims
that the burqa and niqab do not constitute a religious practices
sanctioned or prescribed by Islam but is only a cultural practice.
The new law was introduced because French voters are becoming worried
that the Muslim minority is building a parallel society in France which
was why France claims multi-culturalism is a failure.
Switzerland, Netherlands and other EU states are debating similar
prohibitions.
In some Swiss and German states Islamic dress restrictions exist for
teachers.
The restrictions that are rising across the world and especially
Europe are due to two main reasons: historical and demographic. Western
Europe has a history of monolithic state religion and secularism was
included as a mere monoculture.
No one can deny that Norway treats their official churches as
vestigial organs and they would not give that same place to any other
religion whatever demands are made. What goes without saying and as the
European Court of Human Rights has rightly declared is that religious
freedom is a right but not an absolute one. Where an individual’s
religious observance impinges on the rights of others some restrictions
have to be made. In Sri Lanka our Media refuse to highlight this aspect.
In summary, a very interesting comment on a website by a Tamil
Christian (using the name Lorenzo) is being shared to convey the above
in very simple terms.
Real owners
Being a Tamil Christian, I believe Sri Lanka is a SINHALA BUDDHIST
country.
Let’s play a game.
1. Show me where is Tamil Hindu country?
Tamil Nadu. Good.
2. Show me a English Anglican country?
England. Good.
3. Show me a Hindi Hindu country?
India. Good.
4. Show me an Islamic Arabic country?
Saudi. Good.
5. Now show me the Sinhala Buddhist country?
It is now called Sri Lanka. Correct name Sinhela.
Did God Jesus Christ visit Sri Lanka? NO.
Did Prophet Mohammad visit Sri Lanka? NO.
Did Krishna visit Sri Lanka? NO. (Rama did visit Sri Lanka but to
destroy it.)
Did Buddha visit Sri Lanka? Oh! Yes!
So it is a Buddhist country. Sri Lanka is the ONLY country Buddha
visited BY CHOICE. He was in Nepal/India so he had no choice there. But
the moment he got a choice, where did he visit? Sri Lanka.
So this is why Sri Lanka is the Sinhala Buddhist country.
But some foolish Sinhala Buddhists have out of GENEROSITY given up
their claims.
If you still don’t believe it let me explain from the Bible - Wise
King Solomon.
Once upon a time there was a very wise king by the name Solomon He
was the king, army commander, the judge and the jury and the Parliament.
One day two women came to him claiming ONE baby as theirs. Two
mothers, one baby!
King asked, “Yako, whose son is this?”
MINE! Screamed both women.
Then the king asked, “whose son is this?”
MINE! Screamed both women.
hmmmm…thought the wise king. He ordered a soldier to cut the baby
into half and give each half to each woman.
Then ONE woman came to the baby’s rescue and stopped the king. She
begged to spare the baby.
So the king found the OWNER of the baby!
And he hacked the other FAKE woman to death.
When Norway, UK, India, USA, UNHRC, LTTE, PLOTE, IPKF, Tamil MODA-RATES,
etc. tried to CUT SL into halves, who came forward to defend it?
Minorities?
(Well VERY few of them DID come forward UNDER the leadership of real
owners).
Sinhalese. YES. Like the REAL mother of that baby, Sinhalese came
forward to defend their baby – Sri Lanka
That establishes who the REAL OWNER of Sri Lanka is.
(I know we are not as wise as King Solomon, but we are intelligent
enough to get it, aren’t we?) |