Rural sector signatory of election victory
Wijitha Nakkawita
The country just witnessed a Presidential election. The verdict of
the people was clearly seen. President Mahinda Rajapaksa won by a clear
majority of votes and it is now time to get back to work. Development
programs started during the past four years have to be continued for the
national economy to achieve a rate of rapid growth.
Acceleration of the ongoing infrastructure programs, extension and
diversification of agriculture and value addition to both the
traditional and commercial plantation crops and improvement of the
service sector are some of the urgent tasks in addition to increasing
exports and developing tourism.
Yet what was seen on the political platform of the Opposition and
what happened behind the scene were not always before the public eye.
Therefore we have to examine some of the salient facts that made it
possible for the changes among the more prominent personalities to take
place.
A long time back we had this book on how the spy services and
international hit men, including economic hit men work.
Boost rural sector economy through food production program. File
photo |
But in this country we had our own economic hit men long before the
West conceived the idea. When we regained independence in 1948 from the
war battered UK Government of Clement Attlee our first leader D. S.
Senanayake was a person who loved the country and sincerely strove to
develop it as an agricultural economy. In fairness to DS one should not
forget that his very little academic education was compensated by his
knowledge of the local rural economy and agriculture.
Irrigation
DS had read Henry Parker and R. L. Brohier on the ancient irrigation
works of the Sinhala people and was convinced that major irrigation
reservoirs like Parakrama Samudra, Minneriya or Kala Wewa should be
restored for extensive rice cultivation.
Unfortunately for DS and most other contemporary leaders of his times
was this habit of following whatever the departed British Raj did before
he left our shores. He developed the North Central Province and the
Eastern Province with a rare dedication but once the resettlement of
those ancient lands of the Sinhala Kingdoms with people from the south
took place he called them colonization schemes. Of course the
connotation of the term implies that some foreign or alien community is
brought in to a new place to be settled. Later on one finds the
separatist terrorists and others of the same ilk using the term to say
that ‘Sinhala Governments’ colonized their ‘Homeland’.
Trends
The trends set by the early separatist Tamil leaders from C.
Sunderalingam or S. J. V. Chelvanayakam saw a wedge stuck between the
Sinhala and Tamil people, followed by the latter, smaller politicians
like Amirthalingam who egged on the Tamil youth to take up arms.
D. S. Senanayake’s policy was to restore the pristine glory of the
ancient kingdoms by restoration of the irrigation systems and bringing
under the plough the paddy lands that were covered by the jungle after
foreign invasions.
But the UNP leaders that followed except perhaps for Dudley
Senanayake appear not to have understood the policy of their founder
leader.
Now comes the turnaround in local political scene. In 1956 with the
MEP Government that wished to revive the indigenous civilization. Two
eminent leaders S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike, Philip Gunawardena and P. H.
William Silva chartered several policies to revive the lost prestige of
the country. Unfortunately the right wing in the Government worked hard
to oust Philip and Willam and the right wing finally plotted the
assassination of SWRD ending his life.
Premier Sirimavo Bandaranaike both in 1960 and in 1970 once again
worked to start local industries and revive agriculture but she too had
to face more than one coup or plot like the one in 1962 by a group of
anti-national comprador elements.
Overthrow
Again in 1971 the Janata Vimukti Peramuna attempted to overthrow her
Government by an armed youth insurrection, but failed. In 1977 again a
new UNP headed by the aging J.R. Jayewardene came to power. And he
became the strong economic hit man as well as the patron of the
merchants and importers. Paradoxically his handmaids and sycophants
started calling him the father of the ‘Open economy’ whatever balderdash
it meant!
What were the real results of his policy. In the first place all the
importers of Colombo including foreigners who had been granted
distinguished citizenship by the former UNP Governments – some of them
had defrauded foreign exchange – became very rich almost overnight.
The small, medium and even cottage industries like handlooms folded
up overnight. Farmers were in the doldrums as all food including rice
was imported. The Jaffna farmer who was once a prosperous citizen during
the Sirimavo Bandaranaike Government found he had no market for his
produce.
Now the balderdash open economy only opened the doors for a
microscopic minority of merchants and cronies of the Government.
Successive regimes from Premadasa to Kumaratunga simply allowed the
economic rot to continue but did nothing to revive the main economic
activity agriculture and reduce the huge food imports bill.
None of them addressed the issue of producing our own food nor did
they move away from the existing economic framework and seek to develop
indigenous industries.
Of course they too like Jayewardene had to cope with the terrorist
threat and the danger to the public, mostly unarmed civilians, being
killed in and after 1983.
When President Mahinda Rajapaksa was elected in 2005 he introduced
his singular policy of developing the rural sector for once following
the policy of D. S. Senanayake and Sirimavo Bandaranaike.
Production
His food production program saved the country from the escalating
world food prices when most third world countries spent the largest
percentage of their national income on food imports.
The fertilizer subsidy for farmers was one of the successful policies
that contributed to the increase in food production. The second mandate
of President comes in the backdrop of this radical policy change
that cronies of neo-liberal western powers would frown on. But it
would succeed for the benefit of the indigenous population.
Like in the case of all nationalistic leaders the pro-western groups
hankering after dominance over others would attempt to destabilize the
economy or even engage in treasonous schemes. However as long as the
people were with their leader such anti-national groups or persons
cannot succeed. |