Sticking to the UN
The UN has the backing from some developing
countries to continue as the central body for international negotiations
on climate change
Several developing countries are calling for climate negotiations to
quickly resume under the two Working Groups established under the United
Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Kyoto
Protocol, following the Copenhagen climate talks. They also stressed the
centrality of the UNFCCC as the legitimate forum for the climate
negotiations.
These calls are being made as the issue of what will be the basis of
the climate negotiations this year is emerging, viz. if it is the
Copenhagen Accord (which was not adopted by the UNFCCC Conference of
Parties in Copenhagen) or the outcome documents produced from the Ad-hoc
Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action (AWG-LCA) as well as the
Ad-hoc Working Group on the Kyoto Protocol (AWG-KP).
UN session in progress Courtesy: Internet |
The outcome documents from both these Working Groups were adopted by
the Copenhagen Conference as the basis for negotiations when these
groups resume this year.
It appears that confusion has been generated by the Danish Prime
Minister, who hosted the UNFCCC's 15th meeting of the Conference of
Parties (COP15), and UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, through their
letter of 30 December 2009 to several countries asking them to "publicly
associate with the Accord" and to garner support for it, when the COP
only "took note of" the Accord and not adopt it.
Several developing country diplomats spoke at a multi-stakeholder
discussion convened by the UN Non-Governmental Liaison Service (NGLS),
Realising Rights (an NGO headed by former UN High Commissioner for Human
Rights Mary Robinson) and the Dag Hammarskjold Foundation held in the
United Nations in New York on 25 January. The speakers included
representatives from Sudan, Bolivia and India.
Their main message was that the climate negotiations must resume in
the two negotiating tracks of the AWG-LCA as well as the AWG-KP, in the
run-up to the COP16 meeting in Mexico later this year. This message has
also been echoed by Ministers of Environment of the BASIC group of
countries (Brazil, South Africa, India and China) who met in New Delhi
on 24 January. Ambassador Lumumba Stanislaus Diaping of Sudan, who led
the G77 and China in the Copenhagen Climate Conference, said that the
COP15 President, who is the Danish Prime Minister, must convene the
meeting of the Bureau of the COP, so that meetings of the two working
groups can be organised as soon as possible. He said that this was also
the call of the BASIC countries following their meeting in New Delhi,
referring to a joint ministerial statement issued at that meeting.
Political agreement
The BASIC group Ministers underscored the centrality of the UNFCCC
process and the decision of the Parties to carry forward the
negotiations on the two tracks of the AWG-LCA and the AWG-KP. The
Ministers reiterated that all negotiations must be conducted in an
inclusive and transparent manner and called upon the COP President
(Denmark) to convene meetings of the two negotiating groups in March
2010 and to ensure that the AWGs meet at least five times before the
Mexico Conference.
They emphasised that funding, logistics and other procedural issues
should not be allowed to become a constraint in the convening of these
meetings which are essential to make progress towards an agreed outcome
at COP16.
While expressing support for the Copenhagen Accord, the BASIC group
Ministers said that the Accord is in the nature of a political
agreement, representing a high level of political understanding among
the participants on some of the contentious issues of the climate change
negotiations.
They had expressed hope that this would facilitate the two-track
process of negotiations under the Bali Roadmap.
According to a news report of the joint press conference by the BASIC
Ministers after their seven-hour meeting, India's environment Minister
Jairam Ramesh is reported to have said that while Ministers supported
the Copenhagen Accord, all of them were unanimously of the view that the
value of the Accord lies not as a stand-alone document but as an input
into the two-track negotiation process under the UNFCCC and Kyoto
Protocol.
Minister Ramesh is further reported to have explained that the Accord
was not a legal document but rather an "understanding" reached at
Copenhagen to facilitate the two-track negotiating process in the
Working Groups, which was the only legitimate process.
Kyoto Protocol
The Copenhagen Accord is a three-page non-legally binding document
that was negotiated in what several developing countries saw as an
un-transparent and non-inclusive process, involving only a selected 26
countries. It was not adopted by the COP in Copenhagen, but was only
"taken note" of by the Parties.
The Third World Network (TWN), which also spoke at the NGO meeting at
the UN, said that the most glaring omission of the Accord was its
failure to provide for the aggregate emission cuts needed by developed
countries in the mid-term or any reference to the comparability of
efforts among them (i.e., the US as a non-Party to the Kyoto Protocol is
supposed to take mitigation actions comparable to the Protocol Parties).
There was also no mechanism for review of the adequacy of the pledges
or a compliance mechanism, consistent with that of the Kyoto Protocol.
Instead, all developed countries have to do is just pledge the emissions
cuts they will individually or jointly undertake with no requirement for
the establishment of an aggregate figure which is consistent with the
science and which is therefore contrary to the Kyoto Protocol.
As regards the Accord, Ambassador Lumumba said that proponents of the
Accord should analyse what is not in the Accord, instead of pushing
countries to associate with it. He took issue with the 2 degrees Celsius
temperature limit mentioned in the Accord, as he said that this was not
what the science says should be safe for a continent such as Africa.
Ambassador Pablo Solon of Bolivia agreed with TWN in its observations
about the lack of aggregate emission cuts by developed countries and
said that the Accord was thus a step backwards. In relation to the
pledges by developed countries that is to be made by 31 January for
those who associate with the Accord, he asked what Parties could do if
developed countries make pledges which are of low ambition when what is
required is much more. Solon emphasised that the Accord cannot be the
basis for negotiations and this must be clearly understood.
Robert Orr, the Assistant Secretary-General for strategic planning
and policy coordination in the UN, also addressed the NGO event. He said
that the UNFCCC process must gain universal support as it is the only
legitimate forum for the negotiations. He said that the Danish
Presidency and the Mexican Presidency (Mexico will host COP16) have been
communicating and would come up with a plan for the forthcoming
meetings.
UNFCCC process
Martin Khor, the Executive Director of the South Centre, said at the
same meeting that the way forward for the negotiations is to go back to
the two tracks of the Working Groups. Countries that sign the Copenhagen
Accord can bring their understanding into the negotiating tracks. A key
issue to address must be the emission cuts by developed countries who
are Parties to the Kyoto Protocol to commit to aggregate targets that
are required and for comparable efforts by the United States as was the
understanding of the COP13 meeting in Bali in December 2007. At the same
time, developing countries can do more with finance and technology
transfer.
The representative of Denmark to the UN said that he agreed with Khor,
and that work must progress in the two Working Groups of the
negotiations.
On 30 December 2009, a note verbale was sent by the Permanent Mission
of Denmark to the UN to all missions of UNFCCC Parties in New York
inviting them to inform the UNFCCC secretariat of their willingness to
be associated with the Copenhagen Accord.
A separate joint letter was also sent on the same day by the Danish
Prime Minister, Lars Lokke Rasmussen, and UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon
to the Heads of State and government of the 26 countries who were
supposed to have been involved in drafting the Accord, asking them to
"publicly associate themselves with the Accord", and also encouraging
Parties to garner support for the Accord through regional and
negotiating groupings including through bilateral efforts. It also
invited Parties to submit their emission reduction targets and actions
for 2020 to the UNFCCC secretariat by 31 January 2010.
Several developing countries expressed deep concern that the UN
Secretary-General was seen as promoting the Accord which was not adopted
by the COP.
Indian Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh is reported to have sent a
strongly-worded letter to the Danish Premier as well as the UN
Secretary-General questioning the premise of their letter that the
Accord would be "an essential first step in a process leading to a
robust international climate treaty". Reports suggest that Dr. Singh's
response was to reject this premise of the Rasmussen-Ban letter and to
stress that this was not the understanding of the BASIC countries at
Copenhagen.
Sources indicate that other developing countries have also written to
the Danish Premier, the UN Secretary-General and the Executive Secretary
of the UNFCCC expressing their unhappiness over how the Accord is being
promoted, even though it was not adopted by the COP.
According to several diplomats in New York, developed countries
including the United States and other European countries have been
"putting pressure" on developing countries to associate with the Accord.
One developing country diplomat in New York attended a meeting of
countries with US Climate Envoy Todd Stern is reported to have said that
the US is not saying that the Accord is the new basis for negotiations.
Formal negotiations
According to this source, Stern was of the view that while the formal
negotiations go on in the two Working Groups, some time could be "won"
by implementing the Accord and for that, 100 countries would be needed
for it to take off. Otherwise, the Accord would only be a piece of
paper, said Stern.
Some developing country diplomats are worried that the Accord would
undermine the current climate regime which is the UNFCCC and the Kyoto
Protocol, by laying the foundation for a new treaty that will alter the
rights, balance of obligations and principles of the Convention and the
Protocol.
Some developing country groupings are meeting next month to discuss
the Copenhagen outcomes. These include the African Union and the
Alliance of Small Island States.
Third World Network Features
The writer is the Secretary-General of Friends of the Earth Malaysia
|