Of gossip, sceptics and scepticism
There
is not a single day when I do not receive a few dozen e-mails that may
be considered thrash or unsubstantiated material.
They are mostly ‘e-mail forwards’ with catchy titles sent to me by
friends, that often do not define its origin or source.
Since I know who forwards them to me, I take the trouble to open and
read them.
Otherwise, I let them end up in my junk mail folder to be deleted on
my next log off, categorising them as unsolicited thrash.
These days the forwards I receive on Sri Lanka are mostly, those from
sceptics that predominantly question the government’s claims on the
status of the economy, resettlement of the IDPs, development of the
North and the East, the ability of this nation to seek unity within its
diversity and Presidential elections.
|
Scientists
are calling for urgent action to curb pollution |
On the global front, the majority of the sceptics are currently
focussing on antics of Sarah Palin, policies on healthcare, the economy
and action re Guantanamo inmates, visit to Asia and the Afghan war of
Barrack Obama and on the Climate Change catastrophe.
Own judgment
I like to think that I have an inquiring mind.
I also welcome rational and constructive criticism of others on
issues that matter, so I could expand the horizon of my understanding
and appreciation of these issues.
In my quest for information and knowledge, I desist and sieve-off
some of the ploys of organised ‘PR’ or public relations outfits of
political, religious and /or ideological groups.
I also wish to form my own judgment and opinion of them, gaining
access to as much facts and substantiated information on each of them.
Code of life
The Buddha’s teachings tell us of ‘Majjima Patipadda’ or the middle
way and of the concept of ‘Upekka’ or equanimity for rightful living and
inquiry.
According to the Prajnaparamitha Suttra, practising the immeasurable
mind of equanimity helps extinguish hatred, aversion and attachment in
the hearts of all living beings.
In Hinduism, as we know it, the concept of Sanathana Dharma, the
eternal faith is based on the practice of Dharma, the code of life. The
most important aspect of Hinduism is being truthful to oneself. Hinduism
has no monopoly on ideas. It is open to all.
Ancestors of today’s Hindus believe in eternal truths and cosmic laws
and these truths are accessible to anyone who seeks them. While this is
rationality in its ideal state, what happens around us in reality, is
indeed far from the ideal.
The rationalist philosopher Bertrand Russell once said, “The trouble
with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are
full of doubt.” Given the happenings around us today, it astonishes me
as to how right Russell has been, and how much of turning away most of
us do, from rationality and sensible inquiry.
Creature of habit
Perhaps this is because, as psychologist Stanley Hall claimed ‘Man is
largely a creature of habit, and many of his activities are more or less
automatic reflexes from the stimuli of his environment’. This perhaps is
a rational explanation of why we are comfortable with ideas and thoughts
that are presented to us on a platter, be they by those we trust and
depend on; in the print or electronic media or simply by word of mouth
and/or by duplicity. The latter form is now identified by public
relations professionals as ‘rumour mongering campaigns’.
It is almost unbelievable as to how many of us fall victim to these
campaigns and believe what has been laid before us without inquiry or
validation.
Then there are also organizations and entities that have taken on the
task of propagating the continued existence of dominant ideologies and
thinking, supporting them with funding aimed at different strata of the
social web, within regions, nations and communities.
Climate change sceptics
Let us take the case of the climate change debate.
It is a fact that more than 1,500 scientists from all over the world
have researched and presented information, data and evidence through the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), to substantiate the
thesis that life on planet earth will, within the next decade, face
unbearable environmental conditions, threatening our very existence.
Leading to the next round of climate change action agenda coming up
in December in Copenhagen, they call for urgent corrective action, if we
are to reverse this trend.
According to their findings, this time around it not a cyclical
phenomenon where the ice ages followed periods of warming and new states
of equilibrium was found by the ecological systems. They have pointed
out that within the past 350,000 years of earth’s known geological
history, the past 16 years to have had the hottest five years, following
an exponential trend of the heating of the surface of the earth. The
claim they make, is that we, through our uncaring and greedy lifestyles,
have emitted too much CO2 into the atmosphere and broken the natural
cycle of green house gas based protection we have had, in keeping the
Sun’s rays falling on the earth, under tolerable control.
The point made here is that what we hear, what we read and what we
are told may not always be what it seems.
Whether it is an overtly innocent looking e-mail critical of
governance and government, media or other reports claiming to be
presenting independent views, government’s own propaganda, religious and
ideological presentations or hearsay statements made by people we trust,
will all have to be sieved through intelligent inquiry before we come to
conclusive decisions on their validity for acceptance. |