On the allegedly ‘strong’ coalition called the UNF
There is, understandably, a lot of cheering in some quarters over the
formal announcement of a coalition being formed among some opposition
parties led by the United National Party (UNP). It is reported that
there are 12 parties in this ‘new’ coalition, United National Front (UNF).
If one were to count out those that are commonly referred to as
‘three-wheeler parties’, the UNF is basically a coalition between two
parties, the UNP and the SLMC. All the other parties put together would
not be able to poll even 100,000 votes as things stand today. This
includes Mangala Samaraweera’s SLFP (M), which is erroneously marked as
a ‘main political party’ by some.
What is so ‘new’ about this coalition? The only significant ‘newness’
that could have happened was the JVP jumping aboard. The JVP has stated
time and again that it will never get into a coalition with the UNP,
although reserving that option by saying ‘we will consider whether to
join or not after the Presidential Election is announced’. The JVP has
said that its primary concern is the abolition of the Executive
Presidency. That’s not the primary concern of the UNF, though.
The UNF pays lip service to abolishing the Executive Presidency, but
once you read between the lines you know there’s little sincerity. Such
constitutional amendment, whether it is good or bad, requires a
two-thirds majority in Parliament and consequent endorsement by the
people by way of a referendum on the issue. This is boring stuff.
Everyone promises this, everyone shelves the promise citing this or
that. Never happens. The only way such change can happen is if the
incumbent decides to do the unthinkable: curtail his/her own power. Let
us be realistic here; no politician in his/her right mind would
entertain such an idea. A statesman, perhaps, but that’s a rare
commodity in the current political field.
There is nothing to say that no one else will join this coalition of
course, but current realities suggest that this is it; the UNP sweated
for months and months talking to various political parties but at the
end of the day there are no surprises. Not even a few Government MPs
crossing over, which of course would have been ‘news’ and a boost to
Ranil Wickremesinghe’s ambitions.
I’ve been reading web comments on this ‘breaking story’ and the
response from those who are clearly in opposition to the Government has
been more or less euphoric. The small print suggests that the euphoria
has more to do with preferred political outcome rather than the
potentials suggested by ground realities.
Hakeem is not Ashraff and the fortunes of the SLMC has steadily
declined since the untimely and tragic death of the latter. The
loyalty-switch of the SLMC in 2001 was critical to Ranil Wickremesinghe
becoming Prime Minister in 2001. What we have here is not a
loyalty-switch, it is abiding loyalty and therefore the inclusion of the
SLMC does nothing by way of ‘adding’ to the opposition ranks. Ranil
Wickremesinghe’s UNP of 2009 is a far less competitive proposition than
it was in 2005 and this too has to be kept in mind.
So this UNF of 2009 is nothing but a wearied version of the UNP-led
coalition that contested the 2001 General Election. Politics in Sri
Lanka is about bedding with strangers, the union of ‘incompatibles’ and
so one should not rule out the JVP joining the UNF. A JVP in decline
hanging on to Ranil Wickremesinghe’s coattails would be a pathetic sight
indeed and is likely to drive a significant number of JVP loyalists to
the Weerawansa camp or to non-participation in an election. Thus it
could only be a JVP of reduced circumstances that would join the UNF.
On the positive side, there is the obvious benefit that accrues from
contesting under a single symbol. It gives a greater sense of coherence
to the opposition and that’s not necessarily a bad thing for democracy.
The key word is to recognize reality to understand the parameters of the
possible.
Samaraweera says ‘this alliance is stronger than any alliance formed
in the past’. He must be kidding! His tragedy is that he has been
utterly incapable of reading the political reality. The sad truth, as
far as the UNF is concerned, is that it is saddled with people who make
him look like a visionary.
Consider this ‘observation’ by Mano Ganeshan, who bet his all on the
LTTE and lost badly: ‘The war is over and my party is happy about it’!
Now that’s quite a turn around, isn’t it? What a turn-coat! But then
again, the man may have finally seen reason. Congratulations Mano! What
makes him make Mangala look good is the following statement: ‘As a
result of the peace process the LTTE lost its capacity to wage a
guerilla war; I think the UNP leader deserves credit for this war
victory as a result’. Now this is silliness unlimited, I believe. The
CFA only strengthened the LTTE. It was only a comprehensive effort at
putting in place a security net that inhibited (not prevented) the LTTE
from carrying out guerrilla attacks.
Had Ranil Wickremesinghe won in 2005 given rhetoric and track-record,
Mano Ganeshan would still be visiting the Vanni to genuflect before
Prabhakaran and sing the praises of the LTTE.
So, good luck, the UNF. There’s a long way to go and I am sure Ranil
Wickremesinghe knows this. He probably knows that he has taken on excess
baggage, no-option, no-hope parasites who don’t like Mahinda Rajapaksa’s
face and would die a natural death if it went alone. This is true of
most ‘small’ political parties, whether one likes it or not, and
regardless of choice of coalition.
The best we can hope for from the UNF is that it functions like the
responsible and effective opposition that the UNP has never been. I am
not being very optimistic here. But I wish the coalition ‘good luck’
anyway.
[email protected]
|