English for the poor
Rauf Sheldrake
Though children of elite families don’t have a problem with English
with their family background, frequent usage even with advanced access
to expensive coaching, those in the rural areas are not so fortunate to
have inherited such backgrounds or democratic access to English.
Overlooked
English education in rural schools is a vital aspect in the
national education system |
It clearly appears that visionaries of the past and decision makers
of past regimes have certainly overlooked the English education of rural
children, even though it was proliferating around the world.
The rationale at that time could be that we wanted to reinvigorate
and strengthen the use of our national languages Sinhala and Tamil which
were overlooked by the colonialists. It certainly enabled us to protect
and reinforce our own local languages, religion, music, art, dance and
our local way of thinking, speaking and doing things, though it
certainly opened the knowledge and income gaps between the peasant and
the elite.
Though this decision to correct what the former colonists did
benefited us in resurrecting our ancient culture, traditions and values,
it certainly had a detrimental effect on rural and marginalized sections
of our society. This is because parents of these rural children were
given only one option due to poverty (free provisions), that is to base
all their education in one of the official national languages - Sinhala
or Tamil. Teaching in English was phased out systematically even though
there were some teachers from the British era who could have rescued the
poor.
Background
However, children born with connections to the usage of English
through those who had worked with the diminishing British influence in
the country and the elite families in Colombo and some major towns were
fortunate to have picked up the language from their parents.
These young people secured good placements with lucrative salaries
and benefits in urban areas and abroad especially in the Middle Eastern
countries while those who did not have access to education in the
English language fended up with low paid jobs in State institutions,
abhorring services sector, agriculture, in the limited business
community, garments and other rudimentary industry.
During an inevitable economic crisis due to terrorism in the country,
financial crises in the Middle East or a recession in the West, those
who are unable to secure well or reasonably remunerated jobs always
suffer.
This deplorable situation has been brought about by politicians of
the past who somehow manipulated and wrested control over their voters
to keep voting them to power, by promising to protect the local Sinhala
language.
Introducing English
This is the reason why the present Government is trying to rectify
the situation by attempting to introduce English this year. Former
leaders misled the poor, the underprivileged rural voter by giving them
free rations and managed to keep them less educated to prevent them from
coming to the urban or developed areas to replace the elite children who
were handed over the power, wealth and the facilities to keep
controlling the backward, rural, less educated voter bank. This held
back the growth of the country’s human resource competencies and the
earning potential of low income earners compared to countries in the
South Asian region.
Exceptions
Though there are certainly some exceptions where some rural less
educated youth stormed their way into power, performed well at the
marketplace with admirable business acumen or struggled their way into
the intellectual society in the urban areas, the legs of most of others
in the interior areas are pulled back without the necessary English
language skills to progress beyond a certain level.
While the young people who were somehow connected to the elite,
ruling class, mercantile or former British educated society in the urban
areas were not inhibited the opportunity, to teach English at various
tutories to the underprivileged rural or less educated but eager
children, they have certainly taken advantage of the situation by
letting demand and supply determine how much it costs the poor.
Now that the damage one is apparent, it is up to public officials and
leaders of the future to envision a long - term plan to deter this kind
of phenomenon from happening at least in the future. |