LTTE disregards people's needs - SCOPP
COLOMBO: The Government of Sri Lanka (GOSL) and the Liberation
Tigers of Tamil Ealam (LTTE) met in Geneva 28-29 October 2006, at the
Conference Center Varembe CCV. The Norwegian facilitators and the SLMM
were also present. Ambassador Heidi Tagliavini, Deputy Head of the
Political Affairs Directorate, Swiss Federal Department of Foreign
Affairs, declared the talks open, states SCOPP report.
The talks commenced in a cordial and business like atmosphere and
proceeded until lunch on the second day.
Both the GOSL and the LTTE stated that it was preferable to progress
into discussions on solving issues rather than spending time laying
blame on each other for past deeds.
The GOSL delegation consisted of Nimal Siripala de Silva (head of
delegation), Jeyaraj Fernandopulle, Rohitha Bogollagama, Ms Ferial
Ashroff. Dr. Palitha Kohona, H.L. de Silva PC, Gomin Dayasiri PC and
Chandra Fernando.
The GOSL delegation reiterated that it was, consistent with the
Mahinda Chintanaya, committed to seeking a just and honourable peace; a
peace based on the principles of democracy and human rights; and a peace
achieved through negotiation and dialogue and not violence.
At the outset the GOSL stated that it was agreeable to focusing on
humanitarian issues and the political processes which was launched to
achieve a sustainable solution to the conflict. It also suggested that
agreement could be reached during these talks on issues for future
discussions.
On the first day of the talks, the following matters were discussed:
humanitarian issues, political processes, the de-escalation of violence,
democracy and political pluralism.
Both sides addressed these issues in detail for the first time. The
serious problems confronting the Muslim community in the East and the
North due to the LTTE's ethnic cleansing policies were highlighted by
the GOSL delegation.
GOSL delegation explains
In its presentation, the GOSL delegation explained the government's
development programme for the North and the East and the initiatives
undertaken to address the concerns of the minorities in particular the
Tamil minority.
Details of the steps taken to ensure that adequate supplies were sent
to the Jaffna peninsula were explained carefully.
The government took the view that the needs of the Jaffna peninsula
could be met more efficiently and cost effectively by using the sea
route. Significantly the LTTE made no attempt to contradict these
details, however in the face of the government presentation, merely
shifted its initial contention that the supply of food and medical
supplies to Jaffna was a major humanitarian concern to a new position
claiming that family reunions and freedom of movement for people in the
peninsula was the paramount concern.
And accordingly claimed that the re-opening of the A-9 was critical.
It is also significant to note that no complaints were raised in
relation to any shortages of supplies in LTTE dominated areas such as
Mullativu and Killinochi.
The government explained that the A-9 was open at the Omanthi check
point, enabling supplies to move freely into Killinochi and Mullativu.
The GOSL emphasized that it was only the entry/exit point at Muhamalai
in the Jaffna peninsula that was temporarily closed following the
massive attack by the LTTE on GOSL positions on 11 August 2006.
This attack had completely destroyed the infrastructure that had been
constructed by the GOSL to facilitate the movement of people and
supplies through this check point.
Since then the government had moved essential supplies by ship and
air and also deployed vessels to facilitate civilian movements to and
from the Jaffna peninsula.
The government reiterated that Muhamalai could not be opened
immediately due to concerns for the safety of civilians using the
entry/exit point and in the interests of national security; the
necessity for this approach was even more evident in light of LTTE
artillery and mortar attacks in this area even as the talks proceeded.
(these have continued since then).
Temporary measure
The GOSL emphasized that the closure of the entry/exit point at
Muhamalai was temporary measure and that the government had every
intention of opening it.
However good faith must be demonstrated by the LTTE by refraining
from launching attacks in the areas and undertaking offensive actions.
The GOSL urged the LTTE to cooperate in the short term in order to
provide essential supplies to Jaffna by providing security guarantees to
the ships. The government was facing difficulties in chartering private
vessels for this purpose as the safety of ships could not be ensured due
to the threat of LTTE attacks.
Both the ICRC and the UN had responded to requests by the GOSL and
confirmed that they would be willing to flag the supply ships if the
LTTE gave the necessary security guarantees. The LTTE continued to
refuse to give such assurances.
The government clearly stated that it was willing to place the
opening of the A9 at Muhamali as a priority item on the agenda at the
next round of talks. This it was felt would also allow for time to test
the bona fides of the LTTE assurance that it would adhere 100% to the
CFA.
It would also give the opportunity to engage in strengthening the
confidence building process started at these talks further.
The government intended to re-open Muhamali and make the A9 a modern
highway which will link Jaffna to the south of the country and
facilitate development and ensure a better life for the people of the
area.
It is of paramount importance that the illegal activities resorted to
by the LTTE along the highway such as the collection of illegal levies,
extortion and the recruitment of children for military training come to
an end.
Duplicity of the LTTE
It is unfortunate that the LTTE focused solely on the re-opening of
the A9 highway to the exclusion of alternate options to address the
humanitarian needs of Jaffna and with total disregard to the urgent
needs of the Jaffna people.
The duplicity of the LTTE is evident in this illogical stance and
also in light of the fact that they are continuing almost daily attacks
on the Muhamali exit/entry point.
It is also regrettable that the LTTE which came to the talks on an
unconditional basis decided suddenly after the morning session of the
second day of the talks to impose a precondition on future talks by
demanding that the GOSL delegation agree to opening the Muhamali
entry/exit point immediately.
Nevertheless the GOSL considers the deliberations they had with the
LTTE on political issues encouraging.
The LTTE was briefed on the government initiatives in relation to the
rapidly evolving Southern consensus and on initiatives on constitutional
reforms leading to political settlement to the conflict.
The LTTE responded positively to these developments and in particular
welcomed the MOU signed between the SLFP and the UNP. The GOSL
delegation was able to confirm that they would be in a position to table
at least an interim report of the All Party Representatives Committee (APRC)
at the next round of talks.
The government sees the deliberations as a positive start and
confirmed it was ready to continue the dialogue unconditionally, with a
view to bringing this conflict to an end. |