13th AMENDMENT INCOMPATIBLE with LLRC RECOMMENDATIONS on DEVOLUTION
Neville Ladduwahetty
The recommendations of the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation
Commission (LLRC) have come to be accepted as the holy-grail by the
International Community judging from the repeated references to it both
nationally and internationally in complete disregard to the Government’s
National Plan of Action that was developed by incorporating selected
recommendations in the LLRC Report. In fact, this acceptance has led
many to believe that the implementation of the LLRC recommendations
would bring much needed relief to Sri Lanka’s bruised image.
Since it was the search for a political solution that led to the
three decade long conflict, it is relevant to critically examine the
recommendations of the LLRC in regard to what the Commission considers
should be the contours of a political solution that would foster
reconciliation and a durable peace. With this in view, given below are
all the relevant paragraphs (9.229 to 9.237) in the LLRC Report under
the header “THE NEED FOR DEVOLUTION OF POWER”.
“The need for devolution of power”
9.229 Many persons who appeared before the Commission stated in clear
terms that reaching a political consensus that will facilitate
devolution of power to be of critical importance, to further the process
of reconciliation after the ending of LTTE terrorism, which was the main
obstacle against achieving such a consensus for a long time.
9.230 It is vital that the Government should provide leadership to a
political process which must be pursued for the purpose of establishing
a framework for ensuring sustainable peace and security in the
post-conflict environment. In this endeavour the rights of all
communities, including those who have been members of the LTTE, must be
ensured. To this end a political settlement based on devolution must
address the ethnic problem as well as other serious problems that
threaten the democratic institutions. This political process should
culminate in a constitutional foundation and mechanisms that provide
opportunities for development and implementation of necessary
socio-economic policies.
9.231 Devolution should necessarily be people-centric in nature and
the following considerations should be borne in mind –
a. Devolution should essentially promote greater harmony and unity
and not disharmony and disunity among the people of the country. The
promotion of this ‘oneness’ and a common identity should be the
principal aim of any form of devolution while protecting and
appreciating rich diversity.
b. The focus should be to ensure that the people belonging to all
communities are empowered at every level especially in all tiers of
Government. Devolution of power should not privilege or disadvantage any
ethnic community, and in this sense, should not be discriminatory or
seen to be discriminatory by the people belonging to any ethnic
community within the country.
c. The democratic empowerment of the people should take place within
the broader framework of the promotion and protection of human rights
which is a fundamental obligation of the elected government deriving
from specific provisions of the Constitution and the Treaty obligations
the country has voluntarily undertaken.
d. In addressing the question of devolution two matters require the
attention of the government. Firstly, empowering the Local Government
institutions to ensure greater peoples’ participation at the grass roots
level. Secondly, it is also imperative that the lessons learnt from the
shortcomings in the functioning of the Provincial Councils system be
taken into account in devising an appropriate system of devolution that
addresses the needs of the people. It should at the same time provide
for safeguarding the territorial integrity and unity of Sri Lanka whilst
fostering its rich diversity.
|
One of the
LLRC sittings. File photo |
9.232 An additional mechanism that may be considered is the
possibility of establishing a Second Chamber comprising Representatives
from the Provinces. Such a mechanism is likely to generate a sense of
confidence among the political leadership and among the people in the
Provinces, that they too have a vital role to play in the legislative
decision making process, inter alia, by examining legislative measures
that may have a bearing on issues of particular relevance to the
Provinces.
9.233 All parties should recognize that the real issue of sharing
power and participating in government is the empowerment of the people
and making the political leaders accountable to the people. This applies
to Sri Lanka as a whole and includes the needs of citizens of all
communities, Sinhala, Tamil, Muslim and others. The effective
functioning of the democratic system which fulfils these needs, together
with a consensual framework of devolution will, by virtue of attributes
and institutions intrinsic to it, also provide the answer to the
grievances of minorities.
9.234 All parties must commit themselves to finding solutions
internally through negotiation with each other. The Tamil leaders should
take account of the unnecessary internationalization of the ethnic issue
and the external pressures exercised by the Diaspora and its impact on
the negotiations for a political settlement. The perceptions of external
threat and intervention can create a sense of insecurity that can
seriously impede the progress towards an acceptable solution.
9.235 The Commission is of the view that it is an imperative that any
devolutionary or power sharing mechanism should be realized within the
broad framework of a sovereign, politically independent and multi-ethnic
Sri Lankan State. While the distribution of meaningful powers to the
periphery is essential, there are powers which form the core
responsibilities of the State and which cannot be so devolved, and need
to be retained and exercised by the Government at the centre. It is also
important to ensure that any power sharing arrangement has inbuilt
mechanisms that would effectively address and discourage secessionist
tendencies and safeguard the sovereignty and integrity of the State.
9.236 The Commission wishes to underline the critical importance of
making visible progress on the devolution issue, in order to ensure the
success of any process of lasting and sustainable reconciliation. The
Commission therefore recommends that the present opportunity be utilized
to launch a good-faith effort to develop a consensus on devolution,
building on what exists – both, for maximum possible devolution to the
periphery especially at the grass roots level, as well as power sharing
at the centre. This consensus should be one that will enable peoples’
participation in governance decisions affecting them and avoid costly
and unnecessary duplication of political, bureaucratic and other
institutional structures that hamper efficient, cost-effective and
transparent governance.
9.237 To this end, the Government must take the initiative to have a
serious and structured dialogue with all political parties, and those
representing the minorities in particular, based on a proposal
containing the Government’s own thinking on the form and content of the
dialogue process envisaged. That dialogue must take place at a high
political level and with adequate technical back-stopping.
Key features in the recommendations
1. “…safeguarding the territorial integrity and unity of Sri Lanka
whilst fostering its rich diversity”.
2. “It is also important to ensure that any power sharing arrangement
has inbuilt mechanisms that would effectively address and discourage
secessionist tendencies and safeguard the sovereignty and integrity of
the State”.
3. “The Commission therefore recommends that the present opportunity
be utilized to launch a good-faith effort to develop a consensus on
devolution, building on what exists – both, for maximum possible
devolution to the periphery especially at the grass roots level, as well
as power sharing at the centre”.
13th Amendment incompatible with the recommendations
The 13th Amendment recognizes the Province as the peripheral unit. A
three decade long conflict was waged to create a separate state
consisting of the Northern and Eastern Provinces. Taken together the two
provinces amount to a 1/3 of Sri Lanka’s land mass and 2/3 of its
coastline. The Province as the peripheral unit is a threat to the
territorial integrity and unity of Sri Lanka because its size, both in
terms of land mass and length of coastline, together with access to the
natural resources such as Trincomalee Harbour, present prospects that
are too tempting to discourage secession.
The 13th Amendment has no provision for “maximum devolution to the
periphery especially to the grass roots levels” since all powers are
devolved ONLY to the Province. No powers are constitutionally devolved
to the grass roots levels. According to Article 154G (1) “Every
Provincial Council may, subject to the provisions of the Constitution
make statutes applicable to the Province for which it is established
with respect to any matter set out in List I of the Ninth Schedule”.
Since every Provincial Council MAY make statutes the task of maximum
devolution especially to the grass roots levels is left entirely to the
discretion of each Provincial Council; an arrangement that is totally
unsatisfactory and would inevitably lead to devolved powers being
asymmetric among the Provinces.
The 13th Amendment has no provision to share power at the Centre.
Consequently, all peripheral units are excluded from participating in
the Executive branch of the Government. Whatever representation there is
for the periphery at the Centre, is only in Parliament. The reference in
the LLRC report to a Second Chamber is a feeble attempt for the
provinces to be represented at the Centre. Parliament is already
representative of the provinces and the communities within them.
Therefore, the major communities need to be represented in the
Executive. This is not provided for in the 13th Amendment.
A compatible arrangement
A peripheral unit that would offer greater guarantee of territorial
integrity, dissuade secession and foster diversity would be the
District, with the provision that no two or more Districts are permitted
to merge as in the Constitutions of the US and Switzerland; a precaution
that is not provided for in the 13th Amendment. Powers devolved to the
Districts, Pradeshiya Sabhas and Gramarajas based on the principle of
subsidiarity would meet the recommendation in the LLRC of maximum
devolution to the grass roots levels.
Since Parliament is already representative of communities and
territories, the need is to provide for the major communities to share
Executive power at the Centre in order to foster inclusion of all
communities in executive decision-making processes on an equitable
basis. Such an arrangement should be constitutionally provided for and
could be based on the ratio of ethnic representation in Parliament.
The strident call both nationally and internationally is for the
implementation of the LLRC recommendations. Equally strident is the
regional call to implement the 13th Amendment.
While LLRC recommendations have been accepted internationally, the
13th Amendment is an internal constitutional arrangement.
However, the incompatibility between the two requires that a choice
is made.
Since recommendations of the LLRC pertaining to devolution are a key
to reconciliation the Government could justifiably abrogate the 13th
Amendment and replace it with a fresh amendment introduced in keeping
with the arrangements proposed above for devolution to peripheral units
such as the District, Pradeshiya Sabhas and Gramarajas together with
Executive power sharing at the Centre, which are all compatible with the
recommendations of the LLRC. |