LAND MATTERS
Most 'causes' that people espouse are not causes at
all, they are about what lands people can secure, and what
resources they can control.
John Kenneth Galbraith the Nobel prize winning economist
known for his book The Affluent Society said, if anybody says
that he is doing something for the cause of a specific community
or folks of a given ethnicity -- very probably behind that claim
is a campaign to control territory, and the riches that go along
with the terrain.
Land therefore -- no pun intended -- is the great
subterranean issue, subterranean in the sense that the issue is
the big one that lies behind the grand rhetoric and the
sloganeering on revolution, rights, and indeed about the
preservation of religious and ethnic identities.
It's significant therefore that the President seems to
understand the emotive power of land issues to move and change
the political landscape. That's why he is being extra-careful
about complaints about land grabs.
In a recent interaction he had with some of the officials of
district agencies that have administrative control over land,
there was a quote-worthy exchange that took place.
The episode was aired on national television. At one point
the President tells one of the officials that there are certain
newspaper articles about arbitrary land acquisition - and the
official replies that newspaper stories are often based on wrong
information. The President responds that this does not matter,
adding that that there must be an investigation launched to get
at the truth of the matter.
Arbitrary acquisition of land is the single most volatile
political issue, in the light of what has been stated above.
Land and property is one issue -- verily, the single issue --
that causes war, insurgency, ethnic strife, and all the other
confrontations that can variously be seen as conflicts based on
religion and perhaps even gender.
Land acquisition therefore has to be carefully managed -- or
rationalized. Acquisitions have to be for productive use, and
while there should be few reservations when acquiring plots for
productive purposes, the state taking over of land that smacks
of land-grab activity should be outlawed, as the President
obviously intends.
There can be no hotels on tank bunds, no houses on game
reservations. The flip side of that is that there can be no
stalling of infrastructural development, on grounds of
sentimental attachment to property by groups of persons, or for
petty reasons such as inability to move to alternate state
allotted plots.
Development is hard work, and never pleases everybody. The
worst is when commentators cavil about pavement hawkers and
squatters being rounded up and sent out of Colombo's prime
plots.
Those who say that these people should be allowed to remain
on humanitarian grounds should have their heads examined. Which
metropolis expanded, and took on the character of a habitable
environment that is conducive to tourist and resident alike, by
encouraging a sentimental policy on pavement hawkers and
squatters?
The country's biggest land issue is of course the one that
the war was fought over. Prabhakaran and his brigands wanted
land - their followers in the Tiger rump, still want the land.
The rest of the hoopla about rights, self determination, ethnic
discrimination etc, is all code for 'we want this swathe of
territory - we want the land.'
As much as land grabs cannot be allowed anywhere else in the
country, this land grab cannot be allowed either. If power
devolution will lead to a land grab, that is an area that needs
to be looked at with microscopic scrutiny.
The north and east is in sum, extended real estate. But this
large piece of real estate is also strategically located, and is
resource rich with the large coastline factored in.
It's acquisition by any party will be the biggest land grab
from the Sri Lankan people, making little incursions into game
reservations -- wrong as they are -- look minor infractions by
comparison. Land grabs big or small should come under rational
national scrutiny, and anything that amounts to a land grab for
all intents and purposes, should be outlawed. |