External Affairs Ministry clarifies matters
With regard to the death of British national Khuram Shaikh on
December 25, 2011 the External Affairs Ministry has issued the following
press release:
The attention of the government of Sri Lanka has been drawn to the
media interviews given by UK MP for Rochdale, Simon Danczuk during his
recent visit to Sri Lanka to make inquiries about the progress in the
legal proceedings relating to the death of Khuram Shaikh a British
national, which took place on December 25, 2011 in Tangalle.
The government of Sri Lanka condemned the incident strongly following
the death and conveyed its commitment to prosecute the persons
responsible. After the conclusion of initial police investigations, the
suspects connected with the murder were produced before the Tangalle
Magistrate and remanded. They subsequently were released on bail.
The government has made every endeavour to initiate the criminal
proceedings. A special prosecutor has been nominated by the Attorney
General to conduct the prosecution under the guidance of the Additional
Solicitor General who heads the Criminal Division of the Attorney
General’s Department.
In order to expedite proceedings, a decision has also been taken by
the Attorney General to forward a direct indictment to the High Court
without the non-summary inquiry which is now possible, pursuant to a law
passed this year. The Criminal Investigations Department has concluded
investigations and submitted its report to the Attorney General’s
Department. The Government Analyst’s report relating to the DNA evidence
is awaited and all arrangements have been made to commence proceedings
upon receipt of same. The Attorney General’s Department is closely
monitoring the progress of the Government Analyst in this regard.
During the recent visit of Simon Danczuk MP to Colombo, along with
Naseer Shaikh the brother of Khuram Shaikh, the government facilitated
meetings in spite of the short notice and the busy schedules of policy
makers and senior officials, to brief them on the progress made in the
case and also to listen to the concerns of the delegation. As the case
is currently before Court and matter is subjudice, meetings with the
visiting delegation could only be facilitated to that extent.
|