SC strikes down Z - score
Nelka Medagedara and Sandasen Marasinghe
The Supreme Court yesterday ordered the University Grants Commission
(UGC) to recalculate the Z - score of last year’s GCE Advanced Level
results under the old syllabus and new syllabus separately, declaring
the Z-score issued in that connection was null and void.
The Supreme Court delivering the judgment ordered to recalculate the
Z-score in accordance with section 15(vii) of the UGC Act of 1978 using
the accepted statistic theories and principles.
Court also ordered to issue the Z - score without undue delay.
The Supreme Court Bench comprised Chief Justice Dr Shirani
Bandaranaike, Supreme Court Justice Nimal Gamini Amarathunga and Supreme
Court Justice K Sri Pavan. Court observed UGC had violated the
fundamental rights of the students guaranteed by section 12(1) of the
Constitution by calculating the Z-score considering the students who sat
for the old syllabus and the new syllabus as one group.
The Supreme Court issued the judgment after hearing the fundamental
right application filed by a group of students praying to declare the
Z-score issued on last year’s GCE Advanced Level results null and void.
The Supreme Court in its judgment declared the most competitive
examination held in the country is the GCE Advanced Level and it was the
UGC that introduced the system to calculate the Z - score on the
examination results. The Supreme Court observed the students who sat for
the GCE (A-L) examination under the old and new syllabuses in 2000 were
considered as two separate groups but for the first time that method was
changed in 2011 by considering those two groups as one.
Court also observed this had not been informed to the students
beforehand.
The petitioners, a group of students including Visal Prabasitha
Kaviratne and Lanka Guru Sangamaya filed the fundamental application
citing the Commissioner General of Examinations, the Education Minister,
the University Grants Commission, Professor R O Thatil and the Attorney
General as respondents. The petitioners also pleaded to prevent
admitting students to universities based on the Z - score issued on last
year’s GCE Advanced Level results as the Z score had been calculated
considering the groups who sat for the examination in the old syllabus
and the new syllabus as one group. They argued it was unjust by the
students. The respondents argued that no student faced any injustice by
calculating the Z - score in that manner.
Attorney J C Weliamuna appeared for the petitioners instructed by
Sanjeewa Kaluarachchi while Attorney Senani Dayaratne appeared for the
intervenient petitioners.
President’s Counsel Faiz Mustapha, Professor R O Thatil and State
Counsel Neril Pulle appeared for the respondents.
|