Ineffective leadership
Lal Fonseka
Productivity Consultant,
Brandix Lanka Limited
“The most important, and indeed the truly
unique, contribution of management in the 20th Century was the
fifty-fold increase in the productivity of the MANUAL WORKER in
manufacturing. The most important contribution management needs to make
in the 21st Century is similarly to increase the productivity of
KNOWLEDGE WORK and the KNOWLEDGE WORKER.” Drucker (1999, p135)
Great leaders identify the need to lead by talking to everybody |
"All organizations say routinely 'People are our greatest asset'. Yet
few practice what they preach, let alone truly believe it." (Drucker
1995 p77)
In the last few columns, we have looked at how effective leadership
is built on an unwavering commitment to a clear vision and a driving
commitment to consistently executing the fundamentals well.
Another essential quality of an effective leader is an untiring
dedication to tapping into the skills, intelligence, and resources of
all employees. An effective leader sees each employee as uniquely gifted
and owns the responsibility to determine how to tap into that
intelligence and use and develop those skills for the good of the whole
organization. All organizations say routinely 'People are our greatest
asset'. Yet few practice what they preach, let alone truly believe it.
This is the biggest problem our organizations in Sri Lanka encounter.
Great leadership understands that matching the skill set of an
employee to corporate needs is vital to success. That is more an art
than a science.
Many people in leadership positions believe that the intelligence of
the organization lies in the top management of the company. That is a
myth. As a leader of the organization, your job is to figure out how
best to unleash that intelligence for the good of your organization.
There is no doubt; it is not you the greatest asset of the
organization. It is your employees in the organization.
Great leaders identify the need to lead by talking to everybody. They
create the best map possible by using everyone and anyone as a source of
information. Improve your skill to by first analyzing the groups you
talk with now. You probably have regularly scheduled meetings and
informal discussions with others about concerns and issues. Think about
whom you systematically favour for information and who you may
systematically ignore. Schedule time on your calendar to ask anybody and
everybody about the issues and concerns they face at work. The effective
leaders come to work earlier than anyone just to stand at the entrance
to say "Good Morning" to everyone in the organization.
Sam Walton, founder of Wal-Mart, the number-one retail company in the
world, traveled around the country continually visiting his stores. His
goal was to gather information from each and every person he meets.
Walton talked to store managers, cashiers, stock clerks, and customers.
He queried them about the issues, concerns, and problems that they felt
affected store success and customer satisfaction. Do not misunderstand
this action of Sam Walton to a act of gossiping or collecting
information from employees and setting one against another.
If your organization has trouble identifying leaders, or has a
shortage of leaders, be noted that you have a leadership problem. The
biggest problem you have is the leadership problem and you cannot have
any other problems. There is no argument, one has to agree with me that
one of the primary responsibilities of leadership is to create more and
better leaders. It was the very reason, John Maxwell said, "There is no
success without a successor."
It is important to realize that just because someone is in a
leadership position, does not necessarily mean they all are leaders. If
put this in another way, not all leaders are leaders. I am not afraid to
say that many leaders in Sri Lanka are not true leaders but they are ace
cheaters. They say something, do something else. They have a sweet set
of words in the vocabulary to address people. But now a day, employees
are not fools to accept whatever the leaders put across to them. They
know very well what leaders are up to.
However, the main problem many organizations are facing is that they
cannot recognize good leaders from bad ones. In the text that follows, I
will address how to spot ineffective leaders. This is only a few.
1. A leader who lacks character or integrity is not a leader. He may
be intelligent, affable, persuasive, or savvy, but if he is prone to
rationalizing unethical behavior based upon current or future needs they
will eventually fall prey to their own undoing... As I have been
repeatedly highlighting before, leaders should be role models. But from
where we could find these role models?
2. Lack of Performance: One might argue that no one is perfect, but
leaders who consistently fail are not leaders, no matter how much you
wish they were. While past performance is not always a certain indicator
of future events, a long-term track record of success should not be
taken lightly. Someone who has consistently experienced success in
leadership roles has a much better chance of success than someone who
has not. It is important to remember unproven leaders come with a high
risk premium.
3. Poor Communication Skills: We have talked about this before. If
someone asks me to show a leader with poor communication skills and I
will show you someone who will be short-lived in their position. Great
leaders can communicate effectively across mediums, constituencies, and
environments. They are active listeners, fluid thinkers, and know when
to dial it up, down, or off.
4. Self-Serving Nature: If a leader does not understand the concept
of 'service above self' they will not engender the trust, confidence,
and loyalty of those they lead. Any leader is only as good as his or her
team's desire to be led by them. An overabundance of ego, pride, and
arrogance are not positive leadership traits. Long story short; if a
leader receives a vote of non-confidence from their subordinates...game
over.
5. One Size Fits All Leadership Style: Great leaders are fluid and
flexible in their approach. They understand the power of, and necessity
for contextual leadership. "My way or the highway" leadership styles
don't play well in today's world, will result in a fractured culture,
and ultimately a non-productive organization. Only those leaders who can
quickly recognize and adapt their methods to the situation at hand will
be successful over the long haul.
6. Leaders who do not possess a bias toward action, or who cannot
deliver on their obligations will not be successful. Leadership is about
performance...Intentions must be aligned with results for leaders to be
effective.
7. Leaders satisfied with the status quo, or who tend to be more
concerned about survival than growth will not do well over the long-run.
The best leaders are focused on leading change and innovation to keep
their organizations fresh, dynamic and growing. Bottom line - leaders
who build a static business doom themselves to failure.
8. Leaders not attuned to the needs of the market will fail. Those
are the ones who are disconnected from the market. As the old saying
goes, if you are not taking care of your customers, someone else will be
more than happy to. Successful leaders focus on customer satisfaction
and loyalty. They find ways to consistently engage them and incorporate
them into their innovation and planning initiatives. If you ignore,
mistreat, or otherwise don't value your customer base, your days as a
leader are most certainly numbered.
9. Leaders are fully committed to investing in those they lead. They
support their team, build into their team, mentor and coach their team,
and they truly care for their team. A leader not fully invested in their
team won't have a team - at least not an effective one. This is known as
investing on people.
10. True leaders are accountable. They do not blame others, do not
claim credit for the success of their team, but always accept
responsibility for failures that occur on their watch. In most of the
governmental departments, leaders take the credit for the success of
their team instead of giving the credit to the relevant person. I've
always said that leaders not accountable to their people will eventually
be held accountable by their people.
11. Leaders, who are not intentional and are not focused, will fail
themselves and their team. Leaders who lack discipline will model the
wrong behaviors and will inevitably spread themselves too thin.
Organizations are at the greatest risk when leaders lose their focus.
12. Ineffective leaders do not possess a proper vision: Poor vision,
tunnel vision, vision that is fickle, or a non-existent vision will
cause leaders to fail. A leader's job is to align the organization
around a clear and achievable vision. This cannot occur when the blind
lead the blind.
Conclusion
I had bad bosses at one time or another. You know, the leaders that
make you dread coming into work and are a constant source of your
complaints. While you probably were more concerned about how the leader
impacted your day-to-day work life, poor leadership is extremely
damaging to the entire workforce, and is also pretty costly.
According to a study by The Ken Blanchard Companies, the average
organization is losing an amount equal to 7% of its annual sales because
of poor leadership. That is more than a million dollars per year for an
organization with $15 million or more in annual sales.
Think about it, ineffective leaders create a disengaged workforce,
and employees that are not loyal to their job and the company will start
looking for new job opportunities. This creates a snowball effect of
sorts where companies have to spend time and money fulfilling the vacant
roles, and training the new staff members.
Obviously, companies need to break the trend and solve poor
leadership issues before it is too late.
Quote:
"Companies tend to set targets that are not achievable by the work
force this creates stress and demotivates people in general , but for
some strange reason managers become blind to the work force needs and
tend to see only company objectives.
This is a sure sign of bad leadership as company unrealistic targets
drives managers to send out bad signals" |