Public transport in an age of
development
It augurs well for this
country’s future and the public that the Transport Ministry is
intending to enhance the fleet strength of our buses by
importing some 500 more buses. This is proof that the transport
authorities are abiding by a long term plan for the development
of our transport sector, which is, of course, of crucial
importance to the ordinary people of this country.
We hardly need to elaborate on the risks involved in
continuing to depend on the private bus sector; the consequences
of such dependence have been very plain to see. Suffice it to
say that the ordinary people have suffered silently and
stoically under the harassment heaped on them by a generally
heartless and inconsiderate private bus sector since the late
seventies, when this sector was brought into existence, with the
expectation that it would be more a boon than a bane. If at all
it has been a boon, it has been so in a very limited sense of
that term and the reasons why this is so have been highlighted
with such frequency and even exasperation by the public over the
years that we would be doing something very superfluous by
dwelling on these reasons here afresh.
The recent Alawwa train tragedy is bound to raise some issues
which the authorities need to address but the position could be
forthrightly taken that the state-run transport sector is a must
for public convenience in travelling and an essential
requirement for the majority of the public. It is encouraging to
note that the state is not only keeping this firmly in mind but
going all out to ensure that the wheels of public sector
transport are in humming condition. Accordingly, we warmly
welcome current plans to expand our state bus fleet, for
instance.
We believe that the government is duty bound to ensure that
the public is least dependent on the private bus sector. With
the development process in the country reportedly gathering
steam, it is up to the state to guarantee that public mobility
is at a maximum and two ways in which this is achieved is by
keeping the public transport system in running order and
ensuring that infrastructure development, such as the sustenance
of a sound road network, is continued without a hitch.
The quickening of the development process would require close
planning and development of our public transport sector because
easy mobility of the people is crucial for the flourishing of
business and commerce, which go to the heart of growth and
prosperity. For example, if our provinces are deprived of a
sound transport system, coupled with good roads and highways,
economic activity among the people would grind to a halt. It
could be seen, therefore, that development and transport
facilities need to grow in tandem.
Accordingly, leaving safe and affordable transport to the
private sector would prove an impossible proposition. This is so
because the private transport sector could not generally be
expected to operate in accordance with the public interest
entirely. For, their prime motive is private profit. Nowhere is
this more visible than in the transport sphere. For instance,
private bus operators are usually not sensitive to passenger
comfort or convenience. Besides, rendering a courteous service
seems to be farthest from their minds.
This, of course, should not be so. In the private bus
transport sector we have the proof that the interests of the
public and private sectors do not necessarily meet. It is the
obligation of the state to ensure that these sets of interests
come together and work in harmony. But, admittedly, this is no
easy task. We believe that the state made things difficult for
itself from the beginning by relying too greatly on the private
bus transport sector. This dependence has been taken to such
lengths over the years, that today it is possible for private
bus operators to make it difficult for both the state and the
people by wielding the strike weapon with no thought given to
the public interest.
Therefore, it is about time that the state took things in
hand.
One way of doing this is to limit its dependence on private
bus operators by expanding on the state bus fleet. We urge the
transport authorities to do this to the point to which they
would not be dependent at all on the private bus sector. Acting
with a sense of social responsibility is something that is
expected of the public sector. However, meanwhile, the private
bus sector should be compelled to operate in accordance with the
public interest. |