Sri Lanka slams AI stand
Rasika SOMARATHNA
*Claims LLRC report pre-judged
*Attempt to undermine state
sovereignty
The Permanent Mission of Sri Lanka to the UN in Geneva, Saturday
strongly condemned Amnesty International for pre-judging the outcome of
the country’s investigative mechanism, Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation
Commission, that looks into all aspects related to the Lankan conflict.
“Pre-judgment of the Commission’s outcome is unacceptable and
unwarranted,” Ambassador/Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka to the UN
in Geneva Tamara Kunanayakam said replying to media queries on the
Amnesty International Report on the LLRC, the External Affairs Ministry
said in a statement.
“Claims by Amnesty International (AI) that they have analyzed the
work of the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) is
questionable when the final report of the LLRC is due only on 15
November 2011”, the ministry added.
The ministry said that it was evident that the real aim of those
questioning the legitimacy of LLRC is to undermine the principle of
state sovereignty that constitutes the foundation of the rule that
requires domestic remedies to be exhausted.
“Therefore, pre-judgment of the Commission’s outcome is unacceptable
and unwarranted, and is to be considered as interference in the internal
affairs of a sovereign state”, the statement added.
Amnesty in a report released, on Wednesday stated that the LLRC
investigation is flawed.
The External Affairs Ministry report recalled that AI in a
demonstration of bad faith, refused an invitation from the LLRC in
October 2010, to testify before the commission.
“This would have provided an opportunity to AI to obtain first hand
knowledge of the workings of the LLRC”, the statement added.
It further said, “While pretending to be well versed in legal
proceedings, in the case of Sri Lanka, AI has acted as a self-appointed
judge and has chosen to ignore the fundamental principle of
“contradictoriality” established by both national laws and international
law, including by international human rights instruments. Compliance
with this principle means that the parties have early knowledge of the
opponent’s factual and legal arguments and evidence”.
The ministry noted that the LLRC was founded upon the principle of
restorative justice and focuses on identifying those responsible for
past events related to the conflict and identifying the institutional,
administrative and legislative measures which need to be implemented in
order to prevent recurrence of such events in the future.
Emphasising on the credibility of the LLRC the statement said: “As
for the credibility of the LLRC, it was established by a democratically
elected President and government and is composed of personalities whose
eminence and integrity are not in doubt. Its composition reflects the
pluralistic nature of the Sri Lankan polity”.
On the subject of giving due recognition to domestic remedies the
statement said, “It is a well-known rule of international law that
domestic remedies must first be exhausted. This rule is found in the
case law of the International Court of Justice, the European Court of
Human Rights, the American Convention on Human Rights, the African
Charter on Human and Peoples Rights, international human rights
treaties, etc.”. The statement recalled that calls for external
intervention were made even before the LLRC could actually begin its
work in August 2010.
“How credible then are the claims made by AI?,” the statement
questioned. The ministry said that those questioning the transparency of
the LLRC process were invited to visit the Commission’s website at
www.llrc.lk, where its interim reports/communications are available.
On August 24, two weeks before the Amnesty report on LLRC was
released, External Affairs Minister G.L.Peris addressing the diplomatic
community in Colombo emphasised the importance given in international
law for the exhaustion of local remedies and mechanisms.
“Therefore it is wrong to pre-judge or undermine the LLRC and its
outcome”, he said. |