Bruce Haigh’s mischief making
Prof Rajiva Wijesinha, MP
********----------
I am writing, as Head of the Sri Lanka Peace
Secretariat in 2009, to correct some errors in the opinion piece on ‘The
Drum’, reproduced it seems from ABC News. It seems best to make
annotations direct on the published text, though I hope you will also
reproduce the evidence from the ICRC that suggests Haigh is being his
usual mischievous self as regards Sri Lanka
Continued from yesterday
Haigh should talk with IOM which has been helping government with its
programmes in this regard. All female cadres have long been released,
though after reading a recent Economist article on rape in American
prisons, I realize Haigh might be talking of other types of rape too.
Security Forces personnel helping an elderly Tamil woman.
File photo |
We have had no allegations of rape or torture or disappearance with
regard to these cadres, whose numbers and provenance have been carefully
recorded, and it is significant that the report (which Haigh seems to
have read in a form other than the one sent to me by the UN, which had
just about 200 pages) does not refer to any allegations in this regard
but talks only about cadre being highly vulnerable to such abuse.
It would be as tenable to suggest that anyone coming into contact
with Haigh and his ilk in the days he worked for the Australian Foreign
Ministry would have been highly vulnerable to abuse, if the ministry’s
endless inquiries into the subject are anything to go by - even though
it seems nothing was ultimately proven and everyone got off scot-free.
Whether that suggests institutionalized impunity or a fortunate escape
after a witch-hunt I will leave Haigh to decide.
Senior naval officer
It is wrong for Sri Lanka to have put forward a senior naval officer
intimately involved in the civil war as High Commissioner and wrong for
Australia to have accepted Admiral Samarsinghe.
There are precedents for rejecting Samarsinghe.
In 1995 Australia rejected the nomination as Ambassador of retired
Indonesian General Herman Mantiri. His nomination was rejected on the
basis of war crimes committed by Mantiri against the East Timorese.
The comparison is absurd, since there has been no allegation even of
war crimes against Admiral Samarasinghe.
In 2005 and 2008 the Canadian government refused to accept
nominations for the position of High Commissioner put forward by the Sri
Lankan government, for reasons associated with human rights abuses.
Press freedom
I am not aware of the 2008 case, but in 2005, after much agitation by
LTTE supporters, the Canadians turned down a Civil Servant who had been
Secretary to the Defence Ministry.
It is a crying shame that the Australian government has settled for
lower standards.
In the interests of fighting people smuggling, the AFP has posted
officers to Colombo to liaise with their Sri Lankan counterparts.
However the Sri Lankan Police have blood on their hands, having engaged
in the extra-judicial killing of Tamils for several decades.
I am not sure why the attack now shifts to the Police.
They have been involved in the murder of Sri Lankan journalists.
Press freedom is all but dead in Sri Lanka. In 2009 the editor of The
Sunday Leader, Lasantha Wickrematunge, was murdered. In the same year JS
Tissainayagam, a Tamil journalist and newspaper editor, was jailed for
20 years for publishing editorials critical of the government in 2006.
He was held in jail for two years before being sentenced by the Sri
Lankan High Court under anti-terrorism legislation, a catch-all law
similar to but more draconian than Australian legislation.
I do not think allegations with regard to Wickramatunge’s death were
made against the Police, nor against the navy, though the British High
Commission did, four days after Wickrematunge’s death, show me a note
which they seemed to be worried about, implicating the then Army
Commander. This now seems to have been forgotten by them.
Humanitarian assistance
Tissainayagam was charged and found guilty, though many of us thought
the sentence was too harsh and said so. He was pardoned shortly after
the conviction.
Australia took sides with the militarised Sinhalese majority in the
civil war. At the end of the war, instead of offering humanitarian
assistance to Tamils trapped in government camps, it sent the deputy
chief of the navy, Rear Admiral Davyd Thomas, to Colombo in June 2009 to
liaise with his counterpart, the then Rear Admiral Samarsinghe, on
action to stop people smuggling.
The Australian government gave a great deal of humanitarian
assistance to the Tamils who had suffered. Haigh repeats the LTTE
initiated dichotomy between Sinhalese and Tamils, whereas the war was
between Sri Lankan forces (which include Tamils and Muslims, albeit
several of these were assassinated by the LTTE) and a terrorist group.
Haigh omits to mention that over 200,000 Tamils were held hostage by the
LTTE and used as human shields, a factor that even the equally
prejudiced Gordon Weiss records.
Those who finally escaped were housed, fed, treated and educated by
the Sri Lankan government, with the assistance of the UN and several
donor nations, including Australia, and were resettled within a few
months as pledged in their original places of residence - though a few
are still in the camps since they have nowhere to go, or because the
demining, which was successfully completed more rapidly than anywhere
else, with some assistance too from Australia after the Sri Lankan
government had purchased 24 flails to expedite the process, still
remains to be done in a small area.
Asylum seekers
Thomas also met with the President’s brother, the Sri Lankan
secretary for law and order and defence, Gotabhaya Rajapaksa, a man
accused of war crimes. He also met with the chief of the defence force,
the chief of the navy and the chief of the coast guard. No doubt it was
seen useful to have Samarsinghe in Canberra to assist when and where
necessary in stemming the flow of Tamil asylum seekers.
Haigh may believe that people smuggling should be condoned, the
government of Australia not only has a duty to stop criminality and
exploitation, it must also listen to the views of the Australian people
who, while I believe positive about genuine refugees, are not too keen
on illicit activities that benefit those who wish to make money
unscrupulously, and those who have money to pay for such services.
Over the years the Sri Lankan High Commission in Australia has
conducted a campaign of harassment against Sri Lankan Tamils living in
Australia. They were assisted by the AFP, which saw nothing wrong in
visiting and intimidating Tamils in their homes at odd hours.
This too is nonsense. While Sri Lankan diplomats are keen to stop
terrorism and want the LTTE and those who collect money for tourism
dealt with firmly, they promote interaction between all Sri Lankans.
During my visit, I have met with several Tamils and have encouraged all
those I meet to promote ties between the different Sri Lankan
communities.
Terrorist activities
It should be noted that, far from being fully supportive of our
struggle against terrorism, the Australian government is one of the very
few from the Westernized world not to have banned the LTTE. It is a
matter of extreme regret that Australia has not followed the lead of the
United States and Britain and Europe and Canada in this regard.
A Victorian Supreme Court judge, Paul Coghlan, strongly criticized
the AFP during his summary at the conclusion of a trial into the alleged
terrorist activities of three Tamil males at the end of March last year.
One of the accused, Arumugan Rajeevan, had the novel experience of being
‘unarrested’ by AFP agents. He was pulled over as he was driving to a
meeting, and arrested and handcuffed at gunpoint. Realizing they did not
have the legal grounds to arrest him, the AFP “unarrested “him. Coghlan
also commented that Rajeevan had been abused during his interview which
was an “absolute departure from normal principles.” No admission of
fault or attempt at recompense was made.
Although not guilty of any crime, all three pleaded guilty under
pressure in order to minimize sentences. In the event the state withdrew
charges but in view of their pleas the men still had to be sentenced.
None went to prison.
Haigh clearly knows more than I do about the Australian Federal
Police and the reason individuals plead guilty when charged by virtue of
police action, but if this knowledge is of a piece with the falsehoods
he has engaged in elsewhere in this article, I suspect the Police might
find it very easy to clear its name of his allegations.
Tamil political parties
The Age newspaper commented at the time that, “Coghlan’s damning
critique of police behaviour in relation to Rajeevan’s treatment spanned
not only his arrest but his subsequent treatment at the hands of federal
agents. But the Tamil Tigers case - in which prosecutors last year
withdrew all the terrorism charges against the three accused men -
raises greater issues than just the quality of police work...The
sentencing provides the final chapter in what has been a complex,
international tale that raises questions about how Australia should deal
with citizens caught up in another country’s civil war.”
The appointment of Samarsinghe again raises that question.
Haigh is free to decide what is terrorism and what is a Civil War,
but perhaps he should be asked to explain very clearly why he is so
indulgent to a group that the FBI described as one of the most dangerous
terrorist groupings in the world, who pioneered suicide bombing and
institutionalized child recruitment, who assassinated two heads of
government and several leaders of Tamil political parties that had
adopted a moderate approach.
If he is sorry that we got rid of terrorism on Sri Lankan soil, we
can only wonder at his values and perhaps feel sorry for him - but if he
wishes to resurrect terrorism and terrorist fund raising, either in
Australia or in Sri Lanka, we must request that he not be supported by
the media, without adequate opportunity to refute his mischievous
misconceptions.
Concluded |