The truth at first hand
While there is no
denying that sections of our Northern citizenry suffered
shockingly in the closing stages of the conflict in 2009, the
propaganda mill of the rump LTTE has over the past two years
attempted to parade the falsehood that the Sri Lankan Army was
responsible for these atrocities which were heaped on the
people. But now, the public is learning the whole truth about
this tragedy at first hand as it were, from former TNA MP S.
Kanagaratnam. The interview given by him to the Asia Tribune,
extracts of which we frontpage today, and the whole of which we
serialize on the opposite page, puts the record straight on this
score in the baldest terms.
On Kanagaratnam's testimony we learn that 'more than 600
innocent Tamil civilians were shot and killed like stray dogs
from Oct. 1st to May 18th 2009 in the Vanni region, but not a
single innocent civilian was killed by the Sri Lankan Armed
Forces', in the latter's effort to neutralize the Tigers.
Therefore, the world is now in a position to assess the
reliability of the LTTE's propaganda to the effect that it was
the security forces which were responsible for the evils
suffered by the Northern civilian sections in question. From Sri
Lanka's point of view, these revelations could not have been
timelier because they amount to a firm and candid rebuttal of
what are considered to be findings against Sri Lanka, by a panel
of personnel appointed by the UN Secretary General to probe the
closing stages of the humanitarian operation by Sri Lanka's
security forces. Therefore, the separatist propagandists stand
naked and exposed as never before.
What is more, Kanagaratnam makes no bones about the fact that
the security forces were the veritable saviours of the civilian
populace who were treated with the grossest inhumanity by the
Tigers. The civilians who were escaping the savagery of the
Tigers were taken to safety by the Army and accorded the most
humane and kindly treatment. Besides, these hapless people were
used as human shields by the LTTE and bore the brunt of the
Tigers' shelling while trying to escape to the zones earmarked
for their protection by the Army.
The revelatory disclosure is also made by Kanagaratnam that
some of those Tiger bigwigs who attempted to surrender to the
security forces with 'white flags', could very well have been
butchered by the Tigers because it was the express wish of the
LTTE leader that such persons should be eliminated. The Tiger
leader was, we are told, highly intolerant of those who betrayed
his 'cause'. Here, again, some current allegations against the
state stand fully exposed as absolute canards.
All in all, this testimony by the former TNA MP is the most
substantive eye witness account to date, that the Lankan state
and its agencies have discharged their responsibilities in the
former conflict hit areas, in an exceptionally exemplary
fashion. Besides, the world is treated to the truth that it is
the LTTE which has been the scourge of the people of the
North-East right along.
Thus, the interview could be viewed as a statement which
reflects very well on the Lankan state. The state has emerged in
this expose as an objective entity which works indefatigably
towards the common good and which invariably acts and thinks on
the basis of the principle of impartiality. The state could rise
above narrow and parochial considerations and these points need
to be taken cognizance of by those sections which have subjected
the state to vitriolic criticism, particularly in the context of
issues which have relevance to our conflict. Thus, the state has
emerged in a highly positive light and we have here the evidence
that the state could hold Sri Lanka together, come what may. In
particular, it needs to be noted that the state emerges here as
a predominant upholder of what is just and good. And peace is
built on justice. The Tigers, on the other hand, have been
exposed as the curse of the Tamil public. It is all too obvious
that the people have suffered in grim silence all these years as
the LTTE had its way, in the misleading belief that it, and it
alone, is the protector of the Tamil people. But all that the
LTTE did was to cruelly oppress the people and keep them under
its crushing jackboot. Nothing could be more telling and
impactful than the observation that the people were shot dead by
the LTTE like 'stray dogs'.
It is hoped that good use would be made of this expose by our
state agencies, such as our foreign missions. This is ideal
material to counter Tiger propaganda abroad to the effect that
the Lankan state had acted in violation of the law during the
humanitarian operation. Yet, Kanagaratnam's disclosures may be
only the proverbial tip of the iceberg. The state should not
rest in its efforts to lay bare the truth about the security
forces' exemplary role in the North-East. |