Importance of foreign policy
Foreign policy
has received much media attention of late. Hardly a week passes
without a debate on the country’s external relations. This is a
good development. However, there are some irritants too. Still
there are critics who view our external relations through the
prism of the Cold War. Many of them still cling on to the
conservative western-centric policies that have long become
anachronistic by world developments.
The number of contributors too has increased. It is not only
the academia or the media that are taking part in the debate.
Many politicians are also making public pronouncements
concerning the country’s relations with other countries. Sadly,
not all of them are diplomatic enough.
A country’s external relations are too delicate to be made
platform topics at campaign meetings as they have to be handled
delicately. It is normally the prerogative of the President, the
Prime Minister or the External Affairs Minister to make such
pronouncements. Now even Provincial Councillors are challenging
our external friends and adversaries both.
This makes it necessary for the State to educate the public
on its foreign policy so that they would understand the subtle
differences in terminology used by the diplomats and officials.
Foreign policy is an extension of the domestic policy beyond
our shores. Hence they should be in harmony. Both should be
based on the national interest. Hence it is necessary to
understand the external environment or the geo-political
realities of the day.
Foreign policy does not operate in a vacuum. It operates in a
concrete external environment. In the formulating the foreign
policy, the State takes into consideration both the domestic and
external climate.
Sri Lanka has finished one strategic phase of its
development. The end of the fratricidal war with the Tigers has
placed economic development at the centre of the stage. The
foreign policy should serve this objective.
The world has also changed in the meantime. The bi-polar
world had given way to the unipolar world with the United States
as the sole super-power. Now it is also changing. While the
United States has entered a phase of weakening, the centre of
power is shifting to Asia. By the middle of the 21st Century,
China is to become the most formidable power in the world.
Already it is becoming a power house of production.
The new century is definitely a Century of Asia. Hence our
external relations need to take a ‘look east’ orientation.
The status quo in the world is favourable to the big powers.
Hence, there is a big struggle for equity in international
relations and in trade in particular. In this struggle Sri
Lanka’s interests coincide with that of the developing world,
members of the Non-Aligned Movement. While the G-8 has been
found to be ineffective in determining world development G-20
which includes several front ranking developing countries are
called upon to play a bigger role in world affairs.
Besides the West Brazil, India, China and South Africa have
emerged as global players. Sri Lanka has to take these
developments into account. There are also regional up and coming
players such as Iran, Turkey and Malaysia. In this context the
old western-centric policies have become anachronistic.
Looking at our external relations from this new angle it is
seen that it has consciously noted the new developments in
geo-politics.
Unfortunately certain parties including the JVP take only a
one-dimensional view of our external relations. It is very
apparent in considering its attitude to India. The old
anti-India policy of the 1971 insurrection days seem to have
re-surfaced.
There are also others that want to place India and China in
an adversarial role. However formidable they are, both countries
have understood the commonalities they share amidst differences.
That is why they concur on most of the problems facing the world
today, including the reform of the multilateral organizations
including the United Nations.
The Sri Lankan policy of being friends of both suits our
national interest. It is also in our national interest to
develop a special relation with our great neighbour India as we
are bound by century old multifaceted and civilizational ties.
That is why anti-India policy or xenophobia has no place in our
external relations.
Today, foreign policy is not the sole prerogative of career
diplomats. There is a much larger arm of the external relations,
viz., public diplomacy. No country could develop its external
relations without developing public diplomacy. It is hoped that
the new External Affairs Minister would pursue a vigorous public
diplomacy, especially in relation to the security threat posed
by attempts to resurrect the international wing of the deceased
Tigers. |