Somethings get lost, some ‘lost-ed’
Years
ago, as a young undergraduate, I was given a book by Arjuna Parakrama.
It was called ‘Fire from the mountain: the making of a Sandinista’. It
was the story of a rebel, the author, Omar Cabezas. It relates how Omar,
at the time a student leader in the university is recruited by the
Sandinistas and taken into the mountains to be trained to fight the
guerrilla war against Somoza.
He relates the difficulties of transition from student activist to
guerrilla fighter, the hardships, the depravations and the diseases that
become part and parcel of the struggle against a dictatorship.
By the time I read the book, the Sandinistas had been in power for
almost ten years and Cabezas had been stripped of all his positions
following disagreements with the leadership.
This did not matter. It was a time of political turmoil. The nation
was on the verge of slipping into what came to be known as the
bheeshanaya by the Sinhala speaking sections of the population and ‘JVP
time’ by those who led sheltered lives in Colombo and other major
cities. It was a time when being a rebel had appeal to the youth, even
if one was not in agreement with those who appeared to have a monopoly
on things rebellious.
New recruits
The details escape me now. The Sandinistas were later boxed in by the
US-sponsored ‘Contras’ and thrown out, ‘democratically’, by the
US-backed Violeta Chomorro. It took almost two decades for them to
return to power. What I do remember is a poignant observation by the
author about memorabilia.
Omar describes how new recruits, when they find the going tough, toss
things out of their knapsacks. They would keep the little mementoes
they’ve brought along and throw out food items. The veterans would pick
these up, he said. This was followed by a fairly lengthy comment on the
matter of keeping and throwing.
He relates how there are so many little items that remind a rebel of
his home, his family, friends, places that had meaning and of course
girlfriends; handkerchiefs, love letters, little ornaments and so on. He
said that as time goes on, these things get lost, one by one, as the
rebels move from place to place, as they camp and de-camp, as they fight
and as they retreat.
At the beginning, the author says, the rebel would curse and be sad.
Then ‘loss’ becomes a part of the day-to-day, and some losses make other
losses seem trivial and grief over such losses scandalously
self-indulgent. War is not a happy thing. It is made of blood, wounds,
screams, dying and death. What is a token, a little ornament, signifying
love or reminder of a moment of shared bliss when there’s a body riddled
with bullets from which life is fleeing to a land called
‘Irretrievable’?
Physical signs
One by one, Omar relates, he lost all such tokens, all the physical
signs of a life before life, a being before rebelling. He relates how
after this begins the more lamentable ‘loss’, i.e. things that are not
tangible, recollection of event, of personality, moment and their
relevant casings of hue, temperature, fragrance and theme music.
This book was about the 1970s. The reading was in the late eighties.
The recollection is happening, now, more than twenty years later. I’ve
already forgotten the details of the book. I know the larger history,
the narrative of who won and lost and when and why; but the nitty-gritty
escapes me. That’s tragic, for history is made by the little things and
by the little people although these are footnoted (at best) or
deliberately ‘lost’ or ‘lost-ed’ by historian and ideologue.
On the other hand, remembering and forgetting, though structured by
political project, is at some level a personal choice. Moreover, it is
not necessarily the case that narrative embellishment and truncation are
not things that are limited to political history. Trinkets and such are
lost and grieved over, but not only by the political activist or the
rebel.
Life is a trek, from one universe to another, one university to
another, city to city, one library to the next, wearing one cap today
and another tomorrow, in a bus, a train and an overcoat, waving a flag
now and a handkerchief later, a shuttle between smile and tear,
mesmerized by dawns and thrilled by sunsets, a meandering over
trouble-hills and happy-rocks, and in this journey, our bags are turned
inside out; we toss things out and we throw things in.
The knapsack suffers with the traveler and is replaced by a new one
or a container more suitable for the kind of baggage that is preferred
at the particular time. We lament the loss of things that dropped out
unnoticed and grieve over the precious little something that was thought
to be dispensable at the time.
Love letters
And in the end we come to a conclusion about things lost and things
retained, things remembered and forgotten. Each of us, to a greater or
lesser extent, revisit in our minds the places and people that have left
their mark on our lives, go over terrain gone over before, and conclude
that this and not that was what mattered and how, dammit, we were such
fools to let go.
Some years ago I asked the following question: Isn’t it true that the
most endearing of memorabilia are pieces from torn love letters and
heart-soaked handkerchiefs?
Is this true? For me, it seems right now, this is what it comes down
to. I didn’t see any fire from the mountain. I wasn’t a Sandinista. I
walked though. Picked some flowers. Threw away some cans. Some songs I
remember, some tunes I’ve forgotten. Certain fragrances take me to
certain times and certain people. All charming in their own way, of
course. Nothing, though, preserves history’s theme song and
event-specific perfume as love-letter-shard and a heart-soaked
handkerchief. At least to me.
[email protected] |