Climate change and jobs
Dealing with the myths:
Asia and the Pacific are most exposed to the impact of climate
change. Therefore, progress towards a global climate deal is crucial for
its development and its stability.
But such a global journey to a low carbon and climate resilient
future will necessarily involve the world of work and those who will
actually do the job, says ILO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific
Regional Derector Sachiko Yamamoto.
Meena Thakur is aged around 36. She lives with her husband and three
children in a farmers' community in Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.
During the dry season she lives mainly by preparing cakes of cow dung
and selling them as fuel to a nearby brick kiln.
Green jobs are important agents of change and as such can play a
constructive role in the debate and ultimate agreement |
Managing and disposing of the dung produced by cows from the local
dairy sector is a major issue for the surrounding communities as the
dung is dumped widely and contaminates the local river. In addition it
gives off methane gas.It may seem obvious that climate change-related
programs and financial support - facilitating access to renewable energy
and a wider range of ways of earning a living - would be welcomed by the
farming community in Jabalpur.
But it may come as bad news to Meena and her friends in the dung cake
business, cutting off their supply of dung.
She and her family exist on about US$60 per month, and any change
that threatens even a cent of that income threatens her. She does not
view the issues of climate change in the same way as we do.
Yet without her support and that of others like her, if the climate
change challenge is not converted into opportunities for better
livelihoods and jobs, we will not be able to turn negotiated agreements
into concrete change.
It is understandable that questions are being asked about whether
mitigating climate change is feasible, whether, in current
circumstances, we should not be committing resources to supporting
livelihoods and the bottom line?
Although the financial crisis may be easing there is no doubt that
the related social crisis continues for many of the most vulnerable
countries in Asia and the Pacific, and beyond.
In a region where one billion people are classified as working poor
(living on less than US$2 per day), 100 million people were for the
first time recorded as being without a job in 2009. In South East Asia
in the first nine months of 2009, unemployment increased by roughly 10
percent and labour productivity decreased by 2.5 percent, a remarkable
drop in such a short period of time. In Cambodia alone, a quarter of the
garment sector factories have closed.
This does not make an easy atmosphere for negotiations on reducing
emissions, including those at the United Nations headquarters in
Bangkok.
These concerns should be aired. But at the same time some myths need
to be dispelled. The first myth is that action on the environment is bad
news for jobs.
Rather, past experience demonstrates that well-designed,
environment-related investments are beneficial for employment overall,
although there are shifts in the labour market structure.
The so-called green sectors of the economy can be expected to create
more jobs, directly and indirectly, than will be lost in other sectors.
A recent HSBC survey found that, worldwide, businesses selling low
carbon goods and services now generate more revenue than the aerospace
and defence industries combined, making this sector one of the new
linchpins of the global economy.
A second myth is that environmental measures only bring financial
costs. Win-win options clearly exist. Examples include the introduction
of energy efficient appliances and equipment, the sustainable management
of resources such as water, and improvements in housekeeping practices.
The widespread introduction of such measures could greatly reduce carbon
emissions in developing countries and would bring ancillary benefits
such as short return-on-investment periods, net productivity gains,
better working conditions and little or no harm to employment.
To these two myths third would be add - which is that environmental
issues such as climate change are the concern of specialists and can be
solved by environmentalists and negotiators alone.
Whether we like it or not, climate change will revolutionize the way
we produce, consume and earn a living. This historical transformation
will affect all sectors of the economy, in all countries, and
consequently all peoples.
Any commitment by governments will require support from all layers of
society; young and old, male and female, poor and rich, urban and rural,
workers and employers.
When deals made in high level conference rooms do not have the grass
roots support of people like Meena, they are hard to deliver on.
Delivering on reduction targets starts with engaging those on the ground
whose jobs and livelihoods will be the first to be affected. We need to
anticipate and smooth the inevitable changes and manage a 'just
transition' towards a sustainable, low-carbon path.
The good news is that the world of work is ready to be part of the
solution. In June this year governments, employers' and workers'
organizations from the ILO's 183 member States adopted a Global Jobs
Pact that supports a shift to a low-carbon, environmentally-friendly
economy as a way to accelerate a jobs recovery.
Green jobs (decent, environmentally-sound jobs that fuel the growing
green economy), are important agents of change and as such can play a
constructive role in the debate and ultimate agreement.
For Meena and her colleagues this means concrete, timely, technical
and financial help to explore alternatives, giving her in the option of
more value-added tasks like dairy processing.
Progress towards a low carbon future will necessarily involve the
world of work, and convincing those who actually do the job.
A win-win deal that supports economic recovery and emission reduction
is ambitious, but possible. Employment and green jobs in particular, are
part of the solution.
ILO |