GCE Examination mess
The mess that was made of the current
GCE (O/L) exam due to the negligence on the part of sections of
the country's education establishment should not be dismissed
lightly. This is because the whole issue concerns the future of
our young generation.
Education is a subject that cannot be allowed to trifle with
and those responsible for this latest episode should be taken to
task to ensure there is no repetition of the lapses that visited
the 2009 GCE (O/L) exam.
No amount of apologies or commiseration by the education
authorities can cover up the utter mess created in this year's
GCE (O/L) examinations which to say the least is scandalous.
Students were confused and confounded when they sat to answer
their new syllabus Maths II question paper upon the discovery
that a question had been repeated and also by the revelation
that the paper was set up under a new format to the new
curriculum introduced in 2006.
Parents and several Teacher Unions alleged that the new
syllabus mathematics II question paper introduced for the first
time caused a panic situation among the students. Calls have
also gone out for the cancellation of the paper.
Meanwhile, at the same GCE (O/L) exam glaring spelling
mistakes were discovered in the Islamic paper in the English
medium causing difficulties to the students. On top of this it
was reported yesterday that there had been a shortage of history
question papers at the Thurstan College Examination Centre and
the Chief Supervisor had to rush to Royal College in a
three-wheeler in order to replenish stocks.
This certainly is unprecedented and a ridiculous state of
affairs especially concerning the country's education sector
which is different to all others. Especially so when the guilty
parties are our educators identified with the upper echelons of
the country's intelligentsia and respected and venerated by the
public for their learning and standing in society.
Of course remedial measures have been taken to ensure justice
to the innocent students. The Ministry of Education stated that
the Commissioner General of Examinations who had been notified
with regard to the Maths II question paper had informed the
Ministry that instructions regarding the evaluation of the
answer papers would be done after evaluating a sample of answer
papers from all parts of the country as done in previous years,
by skilled groups on the subject in question.
Why the need for such a torturous process if the question
papers were set properly in the first place. The whole issue
smacks of a clear lack of coordination by the relevant branches
which to say the least is unpardonable given the stature and
regard attached to our pedagogues.
If men and women of standing can botch up a simple task such
as setting a question paper what message are we sending out to
the public. What confidence can this inspire? Won't this be a
excuse for other departments too to discharge their functions
sluggishly and in lackadaisical fashion if such a venerated
institution like Education can falter? One only hopes that they
don't take the cue.
Besides what psychological effect will this have on the
candidates is any one's guess. Surely it would not have put them
in the right frame of mind to proceed with the rest of the
examination. And what of their long ordeals of cramming and
burning midnight oil in their toil to score high marks at the
exam. What of the financial sacrifices and the economic strain
by the parents expecting the best academic results from their
children even sending them for tuition classes. Won't all this
be brought to nought by the silly bungling by those who should
know better, in the simple task of setting an examination paper.
The Ministry of Education should not let this lapse go
unchecked lest it be trivialised and repeated. Those responsible
should be made to answer for this negligence. After all, these
panjandrums at the Education Ministry are sustained by the
public purse. They should not be allowed to trifle with the
future of the next generation. Nothing less than a full probe
into the episode is going to satisfy the parents.
The public should not be allowed to lose confidence in our
exams, which may lead to a general state of apathy and contempt
for the system.
Meanwhile, the UNP has called for the resignation of the
Minister of Education over the issue. Although it is the duty of
a democratic opposition to point out lapses of the Government it
behoves on the party to desist from politicising the issue.
Education is a subject that should not be dragged into the
marketplace of vituperative politics. It is therefore prudent
for all parties to join together and suggest avenues that would
overcome the lapses of this most vital sector. |