Food Security:
In the context of human development
Dr. Chinthaka Batawala Dr.(Mrs.) Ruwanthi
Abhayagunaratne
In recent years, the actors involved in the fight against poverty
have become increasingly aware of the effects of their actions. The
concept of human development widens the horizons of economic development
and represents a new objective for policies and action on a local and
global scale. It challenges established paradigms of growth in income,
top-down democratization and cultural homogenisation.
The challenge of applying the human development paradigm to action on
a local as well as global scale is one of the greatest challenges that
the new millennium offers. Its main objective is to fight widespread
poverty in countries belonging to different geographical and economic
areas throughout the world.
Although opportunities for development are important, these
opportunities must be accessible to everyone in a global social and
economic growth process. Action must focus on the more vulnerable
categories in order to create concrete ways of escaping from perverse
mechanisms such as poverty traps.
Food security
Food security is a human right, and its provision is a common
responsibility. Recognition of this fundamental right by the United
Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) has been marked by
a progressive evolution. After 20 years, the Global Agreement on Food
Security has reiterated this common responsibility of humankind as well
as the need for both moral engagement and cooperation. The World
Declaration on Nutrition adopted by the 1992 International Conference on
Nutrition laid out clearly problems of hunger, of malnutrition, and of
nutrition-related diseases; and it highlighted the import of poverty,
ignorance and lack of education as significant drivers of global hunger
and malnutrition.
For the first time - on the global level - the issue of food security
was addressed by national leaders during the 1996 Food Summit held in
Rome. This event placed the issue within a global context by aligning
its opportunities with elimination of poverty, attainment of peace, the
rational and sustainable use and management of natural resources,
conduct of fair trade, and the mitigation and the prevention of natural
and man-made disasters. The 2008 Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)
Global Food Crisis Summit resulted in a consensus statement and called
on the international community to marshal aid to those countries and
regions affected by soaring food prices. Apart from increasing global
food production, the statement urged strengthening investments - both
public and private sector - in agriculture, in agriculture-related
business, and in rural development. Also, it called for re-evaluation of
agriculture-related business restrictions, and for increased investments
in bio-energy research. From this, donor nations and their international
financial institutions have begun to forge a “balance of payments”
response; in particular, for countries with limited capacities in food
import.
Notwithstanding these high level deliberations to end food insecurity
and malnutrition around the world, about 862 million people suffer, as
yet in 2008. Long-term prospects foreshadow a continuation of this
suffering - in fact, a worsening is seen on the horizon, in particular
for Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia. The consequences of the
collapse of the latest World Trade Organization talks on the
agricultural products trade - in light of the present international
tensions relating to climate change -suggest that the food security
issue may not resonate with the international community, in the short
term.
Currently, the food issue has re-emerged vigorously and has been
placed at the highest level of national and international (political,
scientific, economic, and advocacy) agendas in a context dominated by
such factors as: the soaring prices of basic food products; a decrease
in non-renewable energy resources; alarming scenarios of climate change;
and widespread domestic and international migration. Concerns now focus
on the ability of the planet to feed its 6.5 billion inhabitants,
especially in some southern countries where malnutrition and food
insecurity are still relevant challenges despite scientific and
technological progress and the genetic revolution.
It may seem unnecessary to remember that food insecurity is a result
of the combined effects of many factors such as poverty, inadequate food
production, degradation of natural resources (that is, the quality of
air, land, water, and biodiversity), weather hazards, low incomes of
farmers, debt service, the overvalued exchange rate and inflated human
population growth. All of these have amplified pressure on the
environment and on available natural resources. In addition, distortion
and fluctuations in international agricultural markets-in particular the
concentration of agricultural production in some exporting countries
recognized by their protectionist trade policies-weigh heavily on food
security deficits within many countries. Finally, the liberalization of
world agricultural trade is also worsening the already deteriorated
situation of the poorest countries.
As a response, it is generally recognized that food production will
have to increase to meet the constantly increased global demand. In
these circumstances, the pressures that will be placed on agriculture to
meet this demand require additional innovative solutions. In this
perspective, we do not hesitate to consider sustainable agricultural
development as a strategic choice to achieve food security. But the
generic and cross-cutting nature of the concept of sustainable
agriculture requires precaution in its use, country by country, and
continent by continent. In other words, any strategy or policy
development could now embrace the goal of sustainability, but the
implications of such choices are numerous, particularly with regard to:
food sovereignty; air, freshwater, and land use and management;
biodiversity; social justice; ethics; and local or global governance.
Addressing this specific cross-cutting characteristic of sustainable
agriculture, therefore, is very crucial.
Differences between contextual frameworks and objectives often
confuse and complicate the decision-making process. Without a clear
understanding of the purposes and expected outcomes of sustainable
agriculture with reference to sustainable rural development, compromises
on strategies and policies to be implemented would be less productive.
Although agriculture is an activity integral to human life and that of
societies, and given that it marshals and consumes significant resources
(that is, financial and technical, natural and human), the choices
adopted at different political, socio-economic and scientific levels,
there is-as yet-no consensus on the future of agricultural economy, food
systems and rural areas. The current global food crisis, however, can be
considered at this point as overwhelming evidence.
Rethinking of development
A focus on agriculture raises other political and scientific debates
on land use, technology, redistribution mechanisms, public health,
biodiversity, sovereignty and collective security. Exacerbation of the
current world food and energy crises and the human and environmental
impacts of globalization and climate change (especially on the world’s
poor) call for a rethinking of development in an holistic manner-and
agricultural and rural development in a particular way. Hence the need
for a holistic approach - addressing problems with all their
recognisable complexity, in a spirit of economic, social and
environmental sustainability, equity and solidarity- is a must.
Having to understand the extensiveness of the evolving concept, food
insecurity has several repercussions on other aspects of human security.
Most significant is the fact that food insecurity threatens individuals’
survival, especially the poor and marginalised. Soaring food prices has
a significant weakening impact to their purchasing power. According to
some experts, there is no margin for survival in regions where food
comprises from half to three quarters of household purchasing power.
Asia is home to two-thirds of the world’s poor, for whom food takes up
30% to 50% of their household budget.
The problem of food insecurity should not only be seen as a matter of
famine and hunger. With regard to the food utilisation, the increase
prices of food are forcing people to consume cheaper foods with lower
nutritional status. High food prices could also threaten to reverse the
gains in poverty reduction in the Asia, and thereby, undermine the
global fight against poverty. International organisations such as the
ADB and FAO have noted that if high food prices persist, the Millennium
Development Goal of halving poverty by 2015 could be jeopardised.
Furthermore, Southeast Asian countries are developing countries with
large trend of urbanisation that has created wider disparities between
the urban and rural population. Many of the rural households in
Southeast Asia are small farmers that have become net food consumers
instead of producers. Thus, they have not gain benefits from the rise of
food prices.
Meanwhile, the necessary support system to improve their farming is
frail. Not only would the rise in food prices have adverse impacts on
the poor rural populations, but it would also raise the likelihood of
increased rural-urban migration, as many flock to the cities in hope of
better livelihood opportunities. Such trends are evident worldwide.
According to a survey, rural families are sending their children to the
cities or abroad to look for work in ever greater numbers due to the
dire need to support their families and relatives.In doing so, these
poor rural children may run the risk of further jeopardising their own
security - such as falling prey to human traffickers, as is the case in
various parts of Southeast Asia.
Food insecurity also has grave implications for public health. The
lack of food would give rise to increased incidents of malnutrition,
which could exacerbate the spread of infectious diseases - such as
diarrhoeal diseases and acute respiratory diseases - especially in
developing countries. This would inevitably affect the productivity
levels of the populations. The need to effectively engage public health
services would be essential to support efforts in addressing food
insecurity, as the latter requires a multidisciplinary approach to the
problem.
From the perspective of state security, food insecurity would also
have implications on the political stability of states, both as a cause
and effect. Food security can be jeopardised by the lack of political or
social stability. Likewise, food insecurity can lead to political and
social instability and, in turn, a regime’s survival. The food riots in
Indonesia and the Philippines are prime examples of this. Many Asian
governments nevertheless recognize food security as an essential element
of their national security. This is reflected in their protectionist
agricultural policies such as securing new agreements on imports,
increasing the budget to boost rice production and also curbing rice
exports and other policies that reflect a sense of “national
vulnerability” towards the availability and access to food supplies.
In the Philippines, for example, the government mobilised the
military to guard the distribution of cheap rice to rice distribution
stations and poorer areas of Manila and ordered authorities to charge
rice hoarders with economic sabotage, a crime that carries a life
sentence. Similar form of forced control of market also happened in
Bangladesh. (Also it almost took place in Sri Lanka when traders
demanded higher prices for rice.) One of the measures taken under the
state of emergency in January 2007 was to have the Rapid Action
Battalion of the armed forces to patrol and intervene markets in order
to prevent irregularities by traders. This clearly reflects the
significance of food security as a political issue, and to a further
extent, as a matter of regime survival.
Development goals
Apart from its implications on domestic stability, food insecurity
could destabilise regional security. The policy to curb food export in
order to secure national food supply in one country could have a
negative impact on other countries. The restriction on rice exports by
Asian rice exporters such as India and Vietnam sparked panic to other
importing countries in the region and farther afield. Another example
was the public announcement of Thailand’s former Prime Minister Samak
Sundaravej on 30 April 2008 to form an Organisation of Rice Exporting
Countries was seen as a political threat to the region as it might
hamper the economic cooperation built among regional countries.
The most effective strategy for making steady, sustainable progress
on the Millennium Development Goals is to serve all the goals in an
integrated way. However, each goal will need a well-defined package of
technologies and services for success at the field level. The Task Force
on Hunger (which advises on how to meet the target of cutting hunger in
half by 2015) is providing appropriate guidance for developing these
packages in the case of hunger. Pursuing each goal separately without
acknowledging its inter-linkages with others will reduce the complex
process of human and economic development to a series of fragmented,
conflicting, and unsustainable interventions. A comprehensive and
harmonious development approach is much needed.
Given that the majority of poor people live in villages or rely on
agriculture, and that agriculture paves the way for economic growth in
the poorer nations, agricultural, human and rural development will
underlie progress on the broad array of economic and social indicators
that the MDGs emphasize. In pursuing the MDGs, we should seek ultimately
the elimination of hunger, poverty, and maternal and child malnutrition.
In this regard, particular attention should be paid to averting maternal
and fetal under- and malnutrition, which lead to the low birth weight
that damages health, reduces cognitive ability, and robs nations of
healthy and productive adults. Micronutrient malnutrition is a part of
these larger, devastating “hunger” problems.
An emphasis on healthy, productive individuals means that we must
attend not simply to food security at the aggregate level, but to
nutrition security (economic, physical, social, and environmental access
to a balanced diet and clean drinking water) at the individual level of
child, woman, and man. Our interpretation of the MDGs must therefore be
modified to promote a reduction in the absolute number of people living
in unsuitable conditions across all countries, rather than a reduction
in global proportions. The World Food Summit goal, for example, aims to
reduce the absolute number, rather than the proportion, of people
suffering from hunger. Despite these limitations in framing the task at
hand, the MDGs can be used to set a powerful agenda for developing
countries and the international community, because they offer a guide
for planning and implementing a broad range of development efforts.
The agriculture-hunger-poverty nexus
Eradicating hunger and poverty requires an understanding of the ways
in which these two injustices interconnect. Hunger and the
malnourishment that accompanies it, prevents poor people from escaping
poverty because it diminishes their ability to learn, work, and care for
themselves and their family members.
If left unaddressed, hunger sets in motion an array of outcomes that
perpetuates malnutrition, reduces the ability of adults to work and to
give birth to healthy children, and erodes children’s ability to learn
and lead productive, healthy, and happy lives. This truncation of human
development undermines a country’s potential for economic development
for generations to come. There are strong, direct relationships between
agricultural productivity, hunger, and poverty. .
Increased agricultural productivity enables farmers to grow more
food, which translates into better diets and, under market conditions
that offer a level playing field, into higher farm incomes. With more
money, farmers are more likely to diversify production and grow
higher-value crops, benefiting not only themselves but the economy as a
whole.
By increasing food availability and incomes and contributing to asset
diversity and economic growth, higher agricultural productivity and
supportive pro-poor policies allow people to break out of the poverty-
hunger-malnutrition trap. |