Why swallow Western propaganda on Zimbabwe?
Kalinga SENEVIRATNE
Six years ago, I drove from Kruger National Park in South Africa to
Johannesburg a good 6 hours or so by road. For most of the journey we
travelled through White-owned farmland which reminded me of driving in
the countryside in Australia (where I lived for 20 years).
Most of the farms were mechanised and the only Blacks we saw were a
handful of labourers and maids playing with White children and every car
we passed were driven by Whites. The farmlands seem prosperous and the
Whites very rich. But, when we came to the outskirts of Johannesburg, we
came across the teeming Black townships on the hills with its tin sheds,
lack of infrastructure and poverty.
I told my wife I wonder for how long these people will be patient
with the ANC (African National Congress) government. Very soon they are
going to turn around and ask from the ANC where are the dividends of the
liberation struggle for us?
African Union summit |
These days when I tune to the BBC or read a news report on Zimbabwe,
what I saw in South Africa always come to my mind. What we hear in these
reports is about a brutal dictator not about how Black aspirations could
be satisfied in a Zimbabwe liberated from White colonial rule over 25
years ago.
As a journalist I always wonder, some 50 years after liberating
ourselves from White colonial rule are we yet to liberate our minds from
White colonialism? Why is the Asian media swallowing Western media
propaganda and reproducing it here? Have we not learned the lessons from
weapons of mass destruction reporting saga that led to the world
endorsing the Bush-Blair misadventure in Iraq?
Now that we have heard a lot of the propaganda in the past few months
let us look at the historic facts and recent political developments,
which have led to the sad situation in Zimbabwe.
Beginning in 1889, diamond miner Cecil Rhodes and his band of British
imperialists systematically grabbed land occupied by the Shona people
for over 1000 years.
Each volunteer in these imperialist wars were given 6000 acres of
captured land. When the villagers returned to their land they were
treated as tenants. Gradually the Whites developed commercial farming in
these lands and the Blacks became their workers?” if not slaves.
In 1966 Robert Mugabe along with fellow Black nationalist Joshua
Nkomo began a guerrilla war of liberation where the ‘land question’ was
the major issue.
The 1979 Lancaster House agreement hammered out in London paved the
way for independence in 1980 and Mugabe’s subsequent landslide election
win.
Under the Lancaster House constitution the Zimbabwe Government could
only buy white land from willing sellers. When this expired after 10
years, the government passed a law empowering it to make compulsory
purchases.
Twenty years after the 1980 liberation from White-rule some 4500
White farmers owned 70 percent of the best farmlands in the country.
Thus, since March 2000, a group of war veterans of Mugabe ZANU-PF ruling
party has occupied many White-owned farms claiming this as their
dividends for fighting the war of liberation.
Addressing the FAO Food Summit in Rome last month, President Mugabe
said: Over the past decade, Zimbabwe has democratized the land ownership
patterns in the country, with over 300,000 previously landless families
now proud landowners.
Previously, this land was owned by a mere 4,000 farmers, mainly of
British stock, he reiterated. While this land reform programme has been
warmly welcomed by the vast majority of our people, it has however, and
regrettably so, elicited wrath from our former colonial masters.
In retaliation for the measures we took to empower the black
majority, the United Kingdom has mobilized her friends and allies in
Europe, North America, Australia and New Zealand to impose illegal
economic sanctions against Zimbabwe.
President Mugabe went on to list the economic sanctions they have
imposed, which includes cutting off all development assistance, disable
lines of credit, prevent the Bretton Woods institutions from providing
financial assistance and order private companies in the United States
not to do business with Zimbabwe.
All this has been done to cripple Zimbabwe’s economy and thereby
effect illegal regime change in our country he claimed, adding, funds
are being chanelled through non-governmental organizations (NGO) to
opposition political parties, which are a creation of the West.
Further, these Western funded NGOs also use food as a political
weapon with which to campaign against Government, especially in the
rural areas.
While the Western media will dismiss these comments as the ranting of
a dictator hell bent on clinging to power it is important that we
analyse these comments and subsequent developments in the economic and
political spheres with an objective mindset.
While researching for this piece I read many commentaries written in
African websites by Africans many of whom are sceptical about British
and Western concern for democracy in Zimbabwe. Many are questioning
opposition leader Morgan Tsvangirai’s refusal to attend a meeting on
reconciliation brokered by the South African President Mbeki.
Five times he asked President Mbeki to broker a meeting with
President Mugabe, yet fails to pitch up observed talkzimbabwe.com.
It also pointed out British hypocrisy asking: Is it not ironic that
when the formation of the Movement for Democratic Change led by
Professor Arthur Mutambara was meeting with Presidents Robert Mugabe and
Thabo Mbeki, the British Foreign Secretary David Miliband was calling
for President Mugabe to go?
Zimbabwe had been a very peaceful country before the coming of Morgan
Tsvangirai as a political party leader.
He came through the British to disturb the government of President
Robert Mugabe because of his land reform policy observed Cyprian Monju
writing in The Post of Cameroon. I think they are doing so because the
White minority are of British extraction.
Commenting on the recent decision of the International Cricket
Council (ICC) not to expel Zimbabwe from the sports governing body,
Dileep Premachandran of Cricketinfo.com observed that the South Asian
cricketing nations India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh supported
Zimbabwe because there is deep-rooted suspicion about Western double
standards.
Robert Mugabe was an honoured guest at the African Union summit in
Egypt recently, and his host was Hosni Mubarak, who won the last
election in 2005 with 88.6 percent of the vote after the main opposition
was banned from taking part, he noted. Britain and the United States
continue to trade and do business with Mubarak and Egypt.
Human-rights violations worse than those committed by Zanu-PF’s thugs
have been reported from Darfur, Tibet and Guantanamo Bay. Yet, Gordon
Brown and other guardians of human rights are hardly likely to start a
campaign against the US or China added Premachandran.
In his speech in Rome last month, President Mugabe also said that his
Government has embarked on a programme to harness improved water
supplies through building small and medium sized dams in all districts
of the country.
To cushion farmers from the rising cost of agricultural inputs, the
Government has also put in place supportive programmes, which include
the Crop and Livestock Input Credit Scheme and the Agricultural Sector
Productivity Enhancement Facility which extend loans to farmers, for
working capital and equipment at concessionary interest rates.
Zimbabwe has embarked on the development of its bio-energy sector in
2004. It is gratifying to note that Zimbabwe’s bio-energy sector draws
its feed stock primarily from a non-food crop, the Jatropha plant. The
choice of Jairopha is a deliberate government policy to avoid
competition between our food needs and fuel security needs, said
President Mugabe.
It is interesting to examine whether these policies are being
undermined by the economic sanctions, and the campaign against President
Mugabe being waged by western-funded NGOs and politicians in the
country. If that is so, who is violating human rights in Zimbabwe? We
need to make sure that we get a better balanced story rather than
succumb to Western media propaganda.
The writer is a journalist and media analyst who currently works as
the Head of Research at the Asian Media Information and Communication
Centre in Singapore. |