Debate |
by Rajmi Manatunga |
Are we lagging behind other countries?
Sampath Jayakody
From dawn to dusk our ears always hear sounds. To some people it may
be pleasant but not so to some others. This is a vexed issue among
people. The restriction of loudspeakers from 10.00 p.m to 6.00 a.m. is
right. Sound pollution has some effects on the public. Fortunately some
know that.
There are ample instances when people go to the police and claim that
their nextdoor is a headache. This happens almost everyday.
As everyone knows when sound comes from every corner how can a person
go to sleep?
I have experienced this when I sometimes try to study at night. When
the night speakers are on I am unable to concentrate on my studies.
In the buses people get more foxed about this issue. When the driver
starts his blaring engine as well as the cassette the people are in a
dilemma. They are helpless as they are passengers for and are forced to
bear with that.
During daytime there are many corners where people hear loud noises.
From lottery vendors and ice-cream vendors etc. But we must have a look
at them also.
They don't do these kind of jobs for the fun of it. It is their
livelihood so they have a right to use speakers. To some extent it is
also sound pollution but people must not put the blame only on them.
They must be able to bear with these noises.
Actually I do not denigrate upon the vendors who walk along the road
and sell goods. Moreover if we go deeper we find that there are many
people who bring sound pollution in sundry ways.
For example vehicles' horns and people's voices on the thoroughfares.
Specially when a company or person introduces their debut of a product
they utilise that moment for sound pollution as they use these so called
DJ's to lure people's attraction voluntarily, perhaps involuntarily.
Another major example can be seen in rallies. During election season
politicians corrupt not only the people but the sound as well. They are
the ones who should take necessary steps to rectify this problem. But it
rarely happens. It is high time that the concerned authority takes steps
to remedy this impasse.
When we are in schools at about 12 O' clock the mosque starts to
pray. It may be a religious activity to them but not to others.
We as students face this as a real problem and the teachers too. As
it is a prosaic phase as not only teachers but also students become
silent when they hear it. Some may argue that it is only for a short
time.
On the other hand in the temples they start to preach specially on
Poya Days from night to morning. If they realise how seriously they add
to the sound contamination they might be amazed. To an average person
there is a ceiling of sounds to his ears.
It is a predicament that many people do not take this problem very
seriously. Because some are not aware of this. But in some countries it
is completely different. They know the effects cause by sound pollution
and in some spheres it is prohibited even to take off or land flights.
They are even free to take action against it. They know the effect of
it and they stand against it, if anyone violated their rights. It shows
the knowledge people have around the vicinity. Our authorities may not
know about this as we are lagging to a viable solution and a Third World
country.
Thus it is incumbent on the relevant authorities to enact equitable
regulations.
Silence a luxury as noise gains upper hand
Dr. Sampath Tennakoon
These legislations were a long felt need of the country, for which
the brave minister and the CEA needs to be commended. The public should
now take the initiative to act against those who violate the rules.
A problem we all tend to accept as normal and has not been included
in the discussion, as far as I am aware, is vehicles that emit loud
noise under normal running conditions. A good example is my neighbour's
fleet of buses which emit a vibrating kind of noise at 4 in the morning
waking up my two little nephews and the whole neighbourhood.
A sales agent one day very proudly said that it is the noise of these
busses that attract men! Wonder if he and his company could stoop to any
lower standards.
The temple next door too tries to force every one around to obtain
Nibbana by blaring out sermons over the loudspeakers. When questioned as
to why one day, the chief priest's reply was "it is the Dayakas' that
set it up" certainly as a Buddhist practising Ahimsa, he, the chief
priest should advise his followers. The mosque more than a kilometre
away is no better.
When I am rudely awaken from my sleep early in the morning, I sit and
think, where are the good old days, when my neighbour had no busses,
when the temple next door had no loudspeakers, when we slept soundly
till whatever time we wanted to wake up.
Will the two nephews of mine never have that luxury? Should we all
leave this country and start living in better places where such rights
are really respected and leave this country to all the perpetrators so
that they can happily do what ever they want to?
I am a medical doctor and a university don.
Loud noises harmful to health
Anagarika Buddhadasa
As a Western Buddhist I recently spent a rich and rewarding month in
Sri Lanka but as I travelled around I became increasingly saddened and
ashamed at the extent of the general level of noise pollution.
I'm ashamed because I believe it is the duty of all Buddhists to be
leading the charge against noise pollution instead of contributing to it
through, for example, the imposition of intrusive and excessively
amplified temple chanting.
This is no way to convey the spirit of the Dhamma.
Let us remember that The Buddha was also known as Sakya-muni:
The 'Silent' Sage of the Sakyas, and His antipathy to loud noise is
recorded in the Udana (lll,iii) where he rebukes a group of newly
arrived monks at Savatthi for making a great racket thus. 'Monks, what
means this great noise and hubbub?
The Buddha then dismissed them from His presence saying, 'Go monks! I
dismiss you! Ye deserve not to dwell with me!'
Loud noise has also been shown to be harmful to general health and
well-being.
The creation of loud noise therefore arguably violates the First and
most important of all the Precepts.
May I appeal to all Buddhists, monks and laity, to support this
campaign for the reduction of noise pollution throughout Sri Lanka There
can be little doubt that The Dhamma of The Buddha is more effectively
conveyed and absorbed in an atmosphere of serenity and reflection.
The writer is from Australia.
Political activism in universities: Is it permissible?
The recent chaos at the Peradeniya University
which originated with the removal of a hostel name board by a
group of students and the subsequent detention of the Deputy
Vice Chancellor and two Deans, has brought a trite issue back to
the centre of public debate: violence in Sri Lankan
universities.
However, the incident which resulted in a
lecturers' boycott and the suspension of eight students is also
an example of the predominant role played by student unions in
Sri Lanka's university system which is facing several dilemmas
at present.
It is well-known that the 'student union'
factor in the local university sector is inextricably linked
more with politics than the welfare of university students for
which the term seems to stand for.
In each university, there are 'student unions'
under different names, often backed by powerful political
parties in the country. While they do help the students in some
ways, the main objective of these unions appears to be to
propagate the ideals and policies of the political party they
are aligned with.
This political activism witnessed within the
university student community could have its advantages as well
as disadvantages.
The principal argument in favour of permitting
and encouraging political activism in higher education
institutions will be the necessity to enlighten the future of
the country on political issues and inculcate democratic values
in them.
A university is considered a watershed for
democratic values like the freedom of thought and the free
expression of one's views, and it is based on this rationale
that political activism is allowed in universities in most
countries including Sri Lanka.
In fact the university has been the place
where many great leaders commenced and moulded their political
careers.
However, a glance at the past and the present
of our university system could raise doubts as to whether
political activism has truly served the noble purpose of
promoting democratic political values among the university
student population.
On the contrary, politically-backed 'student
unions' are accused of being the frequent perpetrators of
violence in universities which culminated four years back in the
brutal murder of an undergraduate by a fellow student within the
Sri Jayewardenepura University premises.
They are also charged with promoting harmful
practices like 'ragging' in the universities which have claimed
more than one life in the past.
Against this backdrop of events, should
political activism be permitted within the Sri Lankan university
system? Or are student 'wings' of political parties the main
cause for the culture of violence in universities today?
Write to us as we take up a fresh topic on
Daily News Debate. Send in your contributions (in 750-1,000
words) to 'Daily News Debate', Daily News, Associated Newspapers
of Ceylon Limited, PO Box 1217, Colombo, or via e-mail to
[email protected] before November 6, 2007. |
|