Education should be changed to suit business environment
Chandra Embuldeniya
EDUCATION: The editorial under the caption ‘Blighted seats of
learning’ on Daily News (July 11) enunciates a perfect way to move
forward eradicating higher education malaise. The editorial is based on
the assessment made by Prof. Wiswa Warnapala, Minister of Higher
Education on the perpetual troubles facing our university education
system.
It presents an accurate assessment of the situation and the only
solution to many of our problems in brief. The solution I believe is
most crucial for future development of our nation. The solution to
higher education malaise would encapsulate the whole gamut of economic
development of the nation and revitalize it.
In my brief outline below, I intend bringing out a few illustrations
of experiences gained from my association with the higher education
sector in Sri Lanka to justify the editor’s conclusions. Most of our
university students are coerced to become anti social by a handful of
politically driven persons who are aiming for power in future.
The aim of these persons is to create joblessness and keep the
country underdeveloped until they come to power. They want to create a
large base of government employees obliging to their whims while someday
perhaps they would hold the entire country to ransom by crippling
government services.
Their strategic aim is to disable the majority students so as not to
fit into the engine of growth, the private sector, with skills and
knowledge needed. They deprive the country of the spirit and skills
needed for innovations to add value to our resources.
Under the guise of free education, 17 per cent of the cohort of
qualified students enters the university system each year while 83 per
cent are deprived of a convenient opportunity to earn a degree with the
blessings of the State.
The small number that gets into the university are so coerced into
being docile anti social and herded into dancing to a rhythm that suits
the aspirations of even a smaller group of anti social elements at the
expense of taxpayer.
The parents are unaware and even if they are aware, they cannot
respond due to fears and helplessness. It is time we realise the
nation’s development imperatives to rectify the malaise affecting higher
education.
A nation has to depend on a group of pioneering people who are
knowledgeable in technology, science, engineering, medicine, humanities
and fine arts to take us to a higher level of value addition to the
economic resources of our country. It demands a spirit of technological
and business innovation and enterprise, just as many other nations have
seen during their development process.
This means the pioneers have to emerge from society including
academia, business persons, politicians, artists and media persons. All
these people begin as students some day until they take up pioneering
roles in innovation and development activity.
This process would become possible only if students are ready to
learn and allow others to learn in an environment conducive for such
activity. Our universities could not provide such an environment due to
the violent student agitations and harassment of the spirited innocents.
The violence is brought about by a few well-trained individuals who
are perhaps led by paid activists to create instability. Mostly, these
are activists driven by political groups motivated to take power in the
country as happened in the past.
It is so sad that the persons leading this movement in the country
are using their craft to subvert the young minds and push their wily
theories and approaches aiming to destabilize universities. Strategies
adopted by the universities to produce a learned citizenry are
neutralized effectively by these anti social elements.
Unaware
As the editorial implies the parents are unaware of what is going on
in the universities. Even if they knew, they are unable to stop the rot
because the innocent want to stay aloof to the problem fearing
reprisals.
It is important for every parent to know the strategies adopted by
these enemies of society. They first identify the students who have
parental problems or other debilitating problems from their school days.
Then these young men and women are drawn in tactfully through various
means where they are trained on how to lead and take over. The training
begins at the school. As expected, a few of these trained students find
their way into the universities.
Once they are in the university, the process is very swift with each
hand picked one being given a role to play equipped with mobile phones
and allowances for participation and activism. Their main task is to
identify issues that present opportunities for agitation.
They also play roles in organising students for various occasions
with cultural, religious and social importance. Ragging is one of the
principal means of pacifying and silencing students and establishing
dominance over any alternate movements. With these activities, they
identify themselves as leaders and wait for their turn.
Typically, these issues are dealt by administrations in universities
in a manner keeping with policy and in keeping with available resources.
Principal issues are hostels, accommodation, food, and a host of welfare
issues. Sometimes issues related to academic, religious and social
issues arise.
These students expect everything to be done according to their
dictates to the authorities. No matter how logical is the action
proposed by the university they would not stop short of agitation.
Even when they know that, the authorities are working on solutions
they take it upon themselves to agitate to give the impression as if the
solutions are being brought about due to their agitation. They would use
these issues to silence those other students wishing to develop a future
with positive action.
Anti - social
It is a prime objective of these anti social student elements to
create an environment for depriving students passing out getting any
lucrative jobs particularly in the private sector.
As a result, our students passing from universities prefer government
jobs promising pensions and permanency even if salaries are half the
private sectors offering. They prefer to work less typical for the
public sector as opposed to hard work one has to produce in the private
sector.
They want to draw students onto a platform to participate in
‘Satyagraha’ or ‘Fasting’ to get attention to issues including
joblessness and persuade governments to give them any job however
unproductive it may be.
The pattern of agitations will prolong after securing jobs to enhance
salaries, then creating high salary scales, promotions etc. This process
carves out a niche in an unproductive jobless society for the
perpetrators of this anti social movement representing themselves as the
sole liberators of the educated masses.
Private sector is the acclaimed engine of growth in a country. These
students have no perception of an engine of growth. They think
government is the engine of production. Government produces various
statutory services and it is seemingly trying hard to improve quality,
efficiency, productivity and finally, effectiveness of their services.
However, do they produce goods? I am afraid not. Whenever and
wherever governments get into the kind of production for most common
markets the governments have failed and been a cost to society than a
catalyst for development.
Free education
This trend eventually fills up jobs in a country where high
production and productivity are needed with docile pen pushers producing
no outcomes of a high value. These are passengers in an economy already
burdened with a load of enemies of various colours and shapes. We have
not sufficiently understood or taken counter action against these
enemies.
We should find ways of getting them to put their shoulder to the
wheel rather than allowing them to sit comfortably with pension bearing
jobs at taxpayers’ expense. Behind all this is our education system
producing such inert people offensive to society. Unless we stop this
now we are going to add greater inefficiency at the government level.
Let free education continue but let the opportunity be given to those
parents who want children educated to their satisfaction to have a
choice. The parents have a choice when children are schooling.
They choose to give private tuition and nowadays many parents try to
send children to private schools and do not worry about the local
university, as they seem to have lost confidence in this failing system.
These parents prefer their children doing some technical education or
professional education.
As such, freedom of education is practised but free education is a
myth. Because we believe in this myth, we have made our country one of
the poorest, while most other nations in the region have moved far ahead
and continuing to progress economically.
The entire nation is being held to ransom by a handful of these wily
people holding sway in higher education sector. These anti social
elements are getting free education at government expense to hold the
country to ransom.
It is clear from statistics that around 130,000 qualify to gain
admissions to our universities although we receive only around 35,000
applications expecting to gain admissions. It is an equivalent of 27 per
cent. Finally, less than 20,000 are selected. Thus, only 16 per cent of
the qualified are getting a place in the university system under free
education.
The survival number is less due universities carrying many unfilled
vacancies due to dropouts. This number is much smaller when compared
with the actual number sitting A/Levels. What happens to the balance 84
per cent who are also qualified to have a university education?
They blame this free education. At least if those passing out from
the universities through this process become so good then our country
should flourish with knowledgeable and skillful people.
This is not happening as long as the system is held to ransom by the
anti social elements. The business enterprises representing the engine
of growth have found majority of these graduates not so attractive to
their purpose of running a factory or a commercial venture.
They can only find places in a government institution because the
governments are always under political pressure to provide jobs even if
there are no jobs.
This has to stop and education must be changed to suit the business
environment and allow investments to attract into the country to employ
our graduates. How can this happen unless we produce them meaningfully
and deliberately. No matter what the universities try to do, they will
not allow this to happen.
Their wily strategy is to keep the country poor, the graduates
unemployed, so that they can appeal to a small group of people to take
them to parliament in the belief that a utopia will arise from such
politics.
(The writer is the Past President of the National Chamber of Commerce
and Vice Chancellor, Uva Wellassa University of Sri Lanka) |