Finesse lubricabes your media rounds
Gaston de Rosayro
I believe in objective and truthful journalism. That is not to say I
do not admire investigative journalism provided it is honest and well
thought out. Journalism, although a related discipline, is totally
different from public relations. Because in public relations you are
endeavouring to make people look as good as possible while the truth is
hidden away.
But at the same time, I believe in courtesy, a trait that elevates
both reporter and source to a level beyond their titles. Courtesy
constitutes that we should both operate with respect toward the job of
the other.
Different branches
|
Taking an interview |
|
Taking down notes |
|
Journalists covering a situation |
Before we move onto the technical skills required by the different
branches of journalism, it would be wise to concentrate on some of the
‘soft’ people skills you need to master to become an effective reporter.
Good manners and courtesy make life and work easier and smoother. And
these qualities are especially important in communications and public
relations where we are in constant contact with others.
But sometimes simple etiquette seems to perplex or elude people who
work in this industry. Yet we constantly observe mannerisms from today's
media personalities that lack basic thoughtfulness and civility. As a
journalist you can find yourself mixing with all sorts of people and you
have to learn to judge people and places quickly and to adapt your
demeanour and approach to suit the situation.
If you are sent into a rough part of town to interview a group of
notorious thugs and hooligans, you will speak to them in a different way
than you would if you were interviewing a venerable elderly lady about
her golden wedding. In most instances, you have very little time to make
an impression on people, to earn their trust and to win their
co-operation.
That is why it is important to develop and maintain good manners
whenever you are mixing with people in a professional capacity. In
medical school doctors are trained to develop ‘a good bed-side manner’
and those who do not may well opt for a career in anaesthetics or even
pathology.
In journalism, reporters must learn to develop a professional
persona, which enables them to negotiate a range of social situations.
And while our society may now have become more informal, in many
situations courtesy and good manners will still open doors. So here are
some simple rules of etiquette for Twenty First Century journalists.
Introducing yourself
If you are arriving for an interview, make sure you always check the
name of the person when you first meet them and make a point of calling
them Mrs, Miss, Mr or Dr in the first instance. It only takes a split
second, but that display of courtesy, respect and deference will make a
lasting impression. Accompany that first question with the offer of a
firm handshake, a pleasant smile, if it is appropriate to the situation,
and confident eye contact, and you will be laying the foundations for a
good interview before you have even reached for your notebook.
Introduce yourself clearly with no room for misunderstanding . Give
your name, say who you work for and in what capacity. Don't be too
familiar, for instance using the interviewee's first name, until you are
sure it is appropriate. Yes, and there is such a thing as a stupid
question.
Even if you can only ask one or two questions, make sure to ask them
genuinely and show you care about the answer. Even if you are just one
face in a swarm of reporters, remember that the little things can make a
difference to a source and, ultimately,to obtaining the truth. Ask
politely for her help, advice or opinion, explaining how helpful he or
she can be to you. People often like to help others if they can,
particularly if you remember to make them feel important. Unless you are
in an extreme situation, you do not need to apologise for being there.
Ask your interviewee to spell his or her name and double-check facts
and details, adding that you want to make sure that you get it right.
Your appearance and dress can also be vital in this regard. If you dress
like a student who has just come from a party, then you may well be
treated like one and although that may work when interviewing a night
club rock band, it is unlikely to help if you are interviewing a local
grandee.
Formal training
When your interviewee has helped you, remember to express your
gratitude and don't be afraid to repeat how important he is and to use
this final opportunity to make sure you have made an accurate note of
his name, title and contact details. When you take your leave, remember
to repeat your thanks, using their name and title, and promise to keep
in touch, possibly by sending them a complimentary copy of the paper or
letting them know when the item will be broadcast. Exchange contact
details. Remember to keep your promises to them. You never know when
they will be useful to you again.
And finally if your interview is not taking place in ‘polite society’
but in a potentially dangerous situation, I have three tips for dealing
with awkward customers as mentioned before. Make sure someone knows
where you have gone.
Be open and honest. If you try to appear to be “one of the lads” in
the surroundings described above, only to be rumbled as a journalist,
you are likely to receive a much rougher ride than you would if you let
people know you are a reporter when you first walk through the door.
I would argue that formal training should be given not only to
newcomers but also to senior editors and TV anchors on how to speak
calmly, eliminate their bias, treat panellists with less contempt and
perhaps go back to school to learn basic courtesy and good manners.
Their present attitude does not reflect good management. Once this is
done, they could think of educating and training their juniors.
Style, it needs to be said, once meant more in journalism than a keen
sartorial sense, although an acceptable dress sense prevailed. Style was
a common set of principles around grammar and usage.
They were strictly applied and gave a newspaper a coherent literary
and decent form.
It is the memory of the old-school journalism we were part of that
gives the modern ‘profession’ its scraps of dignity. Yes I was there at
the tail end of journalism's golden moment, the brink of its
transformation and decline.
That is why I believe in journalistic courtesy and pray for its
revival.
[email protected]
|