OFF THEY GO
Hoardings will not be allowed in Colombo in future,
and apparently the Defence Secretary has informed all private
property owners of this fact. Though the banshees will already
be girding their banshee loins to oppose this move saying it is
authoritarian and is a Rajapaksa government attempt at stiffing
the freedom of expression (!), the ban on hoardings makes us
Colombo citizens prouder to belong to a metropolis that is fast
becoming one of the most habitable, relative to those in any
part of the world.
This was a move that was in a sense long overdue, but it is
understandable that with the considerable business interests
that would have stood in the way, it took this long for the
Defence Secretary to get things moving on this score.
Civil society in this country is generally not concerned
about such things. These people are up to their necks in what
they think the people are really interested in, such as the Bar
Association convocation.(!)
If the man on the street is asked what he thinks of the Bar
Association convocation, he will probably ask which bar, is it
the one that is open on Saturdays and weekdays, or the other one
down the street, round the corner?
All societies that have a semblance of real order about them
are to some extent police states. For example, big brother is
constantly watching over the citizens of the United States, but
there are no good governance advocates complaining. Traffic
tickets are issued through automated devices; bicycles have to
be locked and parked in parking bays, else they are towed away.
Almost every aspect of civil life is regulated. Drinking alcohol
of any sort is prohibited at baseball and American football
games, and the ban is strictly enforced. People are also not
allowed to drink in their cars.
Drinking in public spaces is as they say, a big ‘no-no.’ The
smoking ban indoors is very rigorously enforced. As for
hoardings, the commercial establishment does not think about it.
Public hoardings are almost non-existent in the US, and where
they do exist the hoardings have come up under strict conditions
of monitoring by regulatory authorities.
Yet civil society and the opinion makers go into a litany
about human rights abuses when pavement hawkers are evicted from
Colombo and slum dwellers who do not have the proper papers are
given quit orders!
That’s testimony that civil society lobbyists in Sri Lanka
are noisome, disruptive and a general nuisance. Activists in
other countries are aware of their civic responsibilities to
make the cities and the public spaces in general more livable
and more habitable. But Sri Lankan civil society activists have
on the other hand a groove they are stuck in that compels them
to bring in human rights and governance issues into everything,
and no doubt a lot of these people are paid to be a regular
disruptive force.
Tomorrow, in these pages we will be carrying an article about
how a well known NGO for instance was infiltrated and retained
as an extension of the agit-prop machine of a very big power.
Yet with all of this paid for propaganda going on in this
country, the people who are paid to do this propagandist work
insist on calling anything written about the work of the State
propagandist. Those who do the real propagandizing are under the
delusion that if they take cover behind slogans such as good
governance and human rights they could pass off their agit-prop
work as being legitimate civic awareness campaigns.
People have gradually becomes so cynical of these efforts due
to the fact that these people bark at the most obviously
productive campaigns such as getting rid of unauthorized slum
dwellers from the city, and they have a very low credibility
quotient as a result. The citizenry is now impervious to their
ranting; after all, they are not so jaded as to be unaware of
the benefits of the good work that goes on around them, the
latest being the effort to get the hoardings down. |