Moves to reduce Rs 33 b from CEB's 2013 cost estimates
Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) chairman Dr
Jayatissa de Costa yesterday said steps will be taken to reduce Rs 33
billion from the 2013 cost estimates filed by the Ceylon Electricity
Board (CEB).
Dr Costa in a press release said the Commission has taken the expired
power purchase agreements with private power producers into account in
the cost estimates filed by the CEB.
The release said the commission is of the view that this energy
requirement could be covered through generation capacity of existing CEB
hydro power plants.
"Based on the generation recorded in January 2013, the generation
capacity of hydro power plants in 2013 is expected to be much higher
than previous years and therefore a saving could be achieved by the CEB
in this respect," the release said. The Commission is of the view that
cutting back on the above identified non essential generation expenses
would result in a saving of Rs 22 billion to the CEB.
The release: "After the assessment of cost estimates filed by the
Ceylon Electricity Board for 2013, the Public Utilities Commission of
Sri Lanka has decided to make cutbacks to these estimates. As per CEB
estimates filed with the Commission, the CEB would require Rs 268
billion to provide electricity to consumers in 2013. The commission
after an in depth analysis of these estimates, identified the prudent
cost that to be recovered through electricity tariffs. The commission
also assessed whether these cost estimates filed by the CEB were
prepared according to the approved methodology. "Upon completion of
these assessment, the Commission decided to cut back on approximately Rs
33 billion of these filed expenses due to these costs being identified
as non essential expenses. Therefore the reassessment of these expenses
and cutting back of non essential expenses by the Commission will result
in this cost component not being passed on to the consumers through
electricity tariff by the CEB.
"Further, it will also reduce expenses incurred by the government as
subsidies towards the CEB. If a revision to the present electricity
tariff is required by the CEB, these proposed rates should reflect the
cut backs suggested by the Commission. Any revision to the present
tariff would also require commission approval. The following were
identified by the Commission as non - essential expenses of the CEB. In
cost estimate filed by the CEB, expired power purchase agreements with
private power producers were also taken into account. The commission is
of the view that this energy requirement could be covered through
generation capacity of existing CEB hydro power plants. "Based on the
generation recorded in January 2013, the generation capacity of hydro
power plants in 2013 is expected to be much higher than previous years
and therefore a saving could be achieved by the CEB in this aspect.
"The commission is of the view that cutting back on the above
identified non essential generation expenses would result in a saving of
Rs 22 billion to the CEB.
Further, through cutting back on non - essential capital expenditure,
the CEB could reduce Rs 5 billion. In addition, around Rs 6 billion in
expenses identified as not relevant to supply of electricity could also
be reduced from CEB estimates.
"After reassessment of their expenses based on commission
recommendations, the CEB may submit their tariff proposals based on
revised expenditure to the commission. Any revisions to the present
electricity tariff should follow the below mentioned procedure. Cost
estimates filed by the CEB and proposed tariff revisions will be subject
to a process of stakeholder consultation. Public views as well as
government policy will be considered before any approval of cost
estimates filed by CEB or any revisions to the current electricity
tariff.
"The Commission shall take steps to ensure that the public and
electricity industry stakeholders are kept informed on the above
mentioned procedures at all times."
|