Development of Transgenic rubber plants
Dr. N Yogaratnam
Dr. N Yogaratnam
|
Hevea brasiliensis (Para rubber tree) is the major source of
commercial natural rubber (cis-1,4-polyisoprene). Rubber produced in
specialized cells called laticifers is one of the most important
biological molecules used for the manufacture of about 35000 products.
Being a cross-pollinated perennial tree species, genetic improvement
through conventional breeding is a rather slow process.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology would play an important role in the future of the
rubber industry. Plant regeneration via somatic embryogenesis using a
variety of explant sources like, integumental tissues, immature anther,
immature inflorescences, and leaf explants are well standardized. Many
genes controlling important agronomic traits and tissue-specific
promoters have been characterized in rubber. Agrobacterium and biolistic-mediated
genetic transformation systems are well established in this crop.
Thus, the basic technology for genetic manipulation of rubber plant
at the cellular and molecular levels is available, making rubber a
suitable crop for genetic engineering. In different laboratories, rubber
plants were genetically transformed for recombinant protein production.
Transgenic rubber plants were also produced with Mn.SOD gene to confer
tolerance against a variety of environmental stresses and tapping panel
dryness. Attempts are also going on to enhance the rubber yield through
transgenic approaches. Since, the major harvested products are not used
as food material, the biosafety concerns are less for the genetically
modified rubber plants.
Rubber tree, a unique transgenesis model
The many advantages of transgenic plants for ‘bio-pharming’
notwithstanding, their one significant weakness is the difficulty in
recovering the recombinant protein. Unlike transgenic animals where
there is continual protein production in the milk, harvesting of the
recombinant protein involves destruction of the plant or a portion of
it, whether the desired protein is to be found in the seeds, leaves or
shoots. After every harvest, it takes time for new growth to take place
before the next harvest is possible. As a result, protein recovery is
more likely to be batch-wise, rather than a continual process.
Taking into consideration the strengths of the transgenic animal
(continual protein production in the milk) and the transgenic plant (low
cost of maintenance, simple clonal propagation) for recombinant protein
production, it would obviously be beneficial to have a production system
that combines both advantages.
The ideal plant for recombinant protein production would be one that
is cheap to maintain and easy to multiply clonally, while allowing for
continual harvesting of the protein. This is where the transgenic rubber
tree has the distinct advantage when compared with other transgenic crop
plants.
In the bark of the rubber tree is a complex network of laticifers, or
latex vessels, each vessel merely one-third the thickness of a human
hair. These laticifers contain natural rubber latex that is exuded when
the bark is cut. Rubber tapping that is routinely practised in estates
and smallholdings is essentially the systematic and regulated cutting of
the bark to harvest the latex. Since rubber tapping is a non-destructive
method of latex extraction and harvesting, the tree can be tapped every
alternate day, now even once in 3/4 days, throughout the year without
pause.
Among plants, the rubber tree is unique in its capacity to produce
voluminous latex upon tapping and to replenish this supply rapidly in
readiness for the next tapping. If Hevea brasiliensis were transformed
with a gene encoding a foreign protein, the transgenic Heveasystem would
allow for continual production of the target protein, a feature lacking
in any other transgenic plant system.
In the transgenic Hevea system, therefore, modern techniques in
biotechnology combine with the generations-old practice of rubber
tapping to add new value to the rubber tree.
Inserting foreign genes
The basic methods employed for genetic transformation of the rubber
tree follow procedures well-established for other plants. As with many
plants, genetic transformation of the rubber tree involves inserting the
selected gene into callus tissue (unorganised clusters of cells) and
then regenerating the transformed callus tissue into the complete
plantlet. Hevea callus tissue cultures are established from anther walls
of the rubber tree male flowers.
Foreign genes are transferred into a bacterium called Agrobacterium
and this is then allowed to infect the callus tissue. The foreign gene
is incorporated into the genetic make-up of the Hevea callus tissue
during this process. As only a small proportion of the callus cells
would be successfully transformed, a mechanism has to be available to
sort out cells that are successfully transformed from those that are
not.
For this reason, the DNA assembly that is used in transformation
contains a second gene that confers antibiotic-resistance to transformed
callus cells. When the callus tissues are transferred to culture medium
containing the antibiotic, untransformed cells perish, while the
transformants - armed with the means to resist the antibiotic - continue
to thrive. The surviving callus cells proliferate and some develop into
embryo-like structures that go on to form plantlets.
Multiplying success
From a number of transgenic plants that have been produced, the ones
that show the strongest protein expression are multiplied for further
study. Neither new nor expensive technology is needed here. The
horticultural practice of Hevea bud-grafting that is harnessed for this
purpose has its roots from the 1950s.
By this approach, unlimited clonal copies - each genetically
identical - can be generated from a single selected transformant. The
amenability to clonal propagation has been proven through successful
multiplication by bud-grafting over four successive vegetative
generations of plants bearing the gus gene. Besides demonstrating the
efficiency of up-scaling transgenic Hevea, these results also confirm
the stability of the genetic transformation in this plant.
Proteins from Hevea latex
The fact that a gene has been successfully inserted into the rubber
plant does not guarantee that the protein it encodes will be
successfully synthesised. Genes, even when they are present in the
transformed plant, can remain dormant. Another point to be watchful for
is the fact that in nature, proteins take on characteristic patterns of
folding.
Some proteins become modified, for example, by having sugars linked
to them. Hence, a recombinant protein that faithfully reproduces the
exact linear sequence of amino acids of the native protein that it seeks
to mimic may still fail as a functional substitute if various structural
modifications are not in place.
Research has shown that transgenic rubber plants can be successfully
synthesised in the latex a bacterial enzyme (beta-glucuronidase or GUS)
and a mouse antibody fragment.
Significantly, these proteins are functional proteins in that their
operational characteristics are retained.
The recombinant GUS protein shows its characteristic enzymic
properties when supplied with its designated substrate, while the
antibody fragment is immuno-reactive to its matching antigenic protein.
In the most recent experiments, transgenic Hevea has produced a human
protein - human serum albumin - in its latex.
Affordable proteins
Its obvious commercial potential notwithstanding, the production of
recombinant proteins from transgenic Hevea is not about profit making
alone. Cost-efficient production by transgenic plants can alter the
economics of recombinant protein synthesis. For example, hitherto
prohibitively expensive chemotherapy could be brought within reach of
the man in the street. Commercial proteins from transgenic plants need
not be confined to high-cost pharmaceuticals either. Moderate-value
proteins such as industrial enzymes or proteins used in personal care
products may also be harvested from engineered plants such as the rubber
tree. In fact, the low cost of maintaining transgenic plants make them
especially suited to high volume production of less expensive proteins
that otherwise cannot be produced cost-effectively in conventional
bioreactor systems.
Advantages
There are several advantages in using transgenic Hevea for the
production of commercially valuable proteins.
Among these are:
* The concept is a novel approach to cost-efficient production of
high value proteins in the latex of transgenic rubber trees, which
essentially serve as production lines.
* The approach is environment-friendly. The process is driven by the
sun and is therefore energy-efficient and essentially pollution-free.
* Rubber trees require no special attention beyond routine
horticultural maintenance.
Their use is thus highly cost-efficient as compared with conventional
bioreactor systems.
* Production of the target protein is continual through a system of
non-destructive harvesting (tapping) of the rubber tree.
* The latex that exudes from the rubber tree is free of animal
viruses and other contagion vectors.
These include pathogenic viruses such as those causing AIDS or
hepatitis, and that cause mad cow disease and its human variant.
* Successful transformation of the rubber tree for a specific gene
needs to be achieved only once.
Rubber trees are amenable to vegetative propagation and an unlimited
number of genetically identical plants (clones) can be generated by
conventional horticultural methods.
* From the bio-safety viewpoint, the transgenic rubber tree raises
far fewer objections as compared with other crops. Hevea propagation is
normally by vegetative means. Hence, it is not expected to have adverse
effect on the environment or on the crop. Unlike transgenic food
products, recombinant proteins from Hevea are purified from the
transgenic elements that are not presented to the consumer.
Conclusion
In simple terms, from the point of view of a practical rubber grower,
the main interest in genetic transformation of rubber trees would be the
introduction of genes controlling specific agronomic traits-- such as
the genes for resisting diseases, drought and other environmental stress
tolerance, enhanced rubber biosynthesis and timber yield and tolerance
to tapping panel dryness etc -- to high yielding rubber clones.
The genetic transformation technique involved is the introduction of
specific genes into single cells and development of whole plants from
these cells. |