Leadership re-invented
Lionel Wijesiri
Change is in the air - in our economy, our nation, and our world. The
use of technology, a desire for authentic community, and a hunger to
communicate and live good lives are challenging the present leaders to
rethink the way they lead.
|
Defence and Urban
Development Ministry Secretary
Gotabhaya
Rajapaksa |
Since late 90s, the job descriptions of leaders, whether political,
social or business, have begun to shift keeping abreast with the
changing expectations and needs of the society. This was particularly
true when it came to next generation leaders within the society.
Under-30s already form the majority of our population, and they are
critical to deciding the future of the country and to tackling
complicated issues like violence, corruption and Climate Change - issues
that need long-term commitment and long-term strategic thinking! We
therefore need to recognise the vast importance of leadership education
to help them develop the skills and knowledge they may need to turn
their dreams into realities. It is in this context we must view the
suggestion made by Defence and Urban Development Ministry Secretary
Gotabhaya Rajapaksa recently that Leadership training should be made
compulsory for youths to build self-confidence and earn victories in the
international sphere as well as locally. As the Defence Secretary points
out, making leaders of our younger generation is a task of the highest
importance because it would be in the national interest to have
resourceful and dynamic youths among us. Essentially, we need to have
persons, who are productive, far-thinking and energetic.
Leadership qualities
The idea is that leadership - like scientific disciplines, for
example - consists of a set of skills, methodologies, and ideas that can
be taught. The difference is that unlike, say, biology, leadership
should inform all aspects of life. Leadership programmes teach important
life skills, such as introspection, cultural sensitivity, moral acuity,
people skills, and decision-making acumen.
Part of the problem was its name; 'leadership' is an amorphous term.
Truth be told, most leadership books - or what are called leadership
books - are nothing more than ego exercises for the author. It was and
remains easy to dismiss a field that seems to include every chief
executive, politician, government servant, and self-employed boss. And
then there is the notion that true leaders are born, not made, and
therefore leadership isn't worthy of academic study. Others worry that
such programmes offer a false promise to students - after all, not
everyone can become a leader. Nevertheless we are witnessing a growth
in, and a new respect for, what we now call leadership studies. This is
occurring in part because of the perception, at least, that Sri Lanka is
suffering a crisis of leadership. Our social pundits are bemoaning the
loss of visionaries. One might ask, where have all the leaders gone?
It is time that our universities and all other higher education
institutes incorporate leadership training into their programmes, or
even create stand-alone business-leadership programmes. At the same
time, schools also could incorporate civic engagement or service
learning, which is enveloped in a language of leadership development.
Basis
If these are been done, the task before us would be twofold if we are
going to embrace this trend. First, each higher education institution
needs to define leadership in a meaningful way before it can develop a
meaningful curriculum for its students. A leadership programme should be
based on the values and mission of the institute. If those values are
not defined, or if the programme does not follow them, students will be
left with a mash-up of courses with conflicting purposes and nothing
tying them together. We should not rush to slap the 'leadership' label
on programmes that are not really grounded in leadership studies.
Second, we cannot just provide the next generation with the pragmatic
tools that this generation of leaders seems to lack, and call it a day.
The skills students will need can't be so narrowly defined because by
the time a student graduates, those tools may well be obsolete. Rather,
students should learn how to recognize and develop such skills in
themselves, what we refer to as lifelong learning.
Once they recognize the importance of leadership in ways that older
generations may not, students will be flocking to these programmes.
Today's students are graduating into a world that is much riskier
than the one we knew. We are beginning to recognize that our current
economic crisis goes much deeper than the recent drop in the stock
market. Our students will find themselves in what I call a
micro-entrepreneurial age. They will have multiple jobs and even
multiple careers during their lifetimes. Many will work for small firms,
and a growing percentage will be consultants and freelancers for most of
their working lives. In short, they will need to be equipped to make
their own opportunities. They need the skills, knowledge, and qualities
that leadership programmes cultivate: self-reliance, social and cultural
capital, appreciation for lifelong learning, creativity,
conflict-resolution and team-building skills, ethics, understanding of
economics, and more. Leadership programmes recognize that the career
ladder of old is broken. In the past, companies could be counted on to
develop leaders by ushering bright employees into management-training
programmes. Today such programmes are few and far between. Colleges and
universities must do the job.
Model
We should stop snickering every time we hear the word 'leadership' on
campus and start recognizing the desire of many students to hone and
professionalize skills that will serve them long after graduation.
Perhaps those skills were once instilled by corporate America or
families. Now higher education is stepping up. Graduates of leadership
programmes may not be crowned leaders as soon as they get their
diplomas, but ideally they will have the skills to lead tomorrow's
generation and to thrive in the new economy.
Leadership training is an experiential process necessary in preparing
students to lead. In 'Bringing Leadership Experiences to Inner-City
Youth,' Boyd (2000) investigated a service-learning model of leadership
brought to at-risk youth. The processing steps used to create
experiential based activities included: Experience, do the activity;
Sharing, describe or reflect on the activity; Process, find themes in
the activity; Generalize, what was learned in completing the activity;
and, Apply, what is learned to another experience or activity (p. 1). I
would combine the words 'process' and 'generalize', and use the word
'reflect'.
Essentially the model Boyd studied created leadership experiences
that were then learned from in a systematic way. In order to guide
experiential based leadership activities, Boyd enlisted the 12
principles that make effective leadership programmes by Woyach and Cox.
These twelve principles are very well thought out and go beyond many
other guiding principles since they address both the outcomes and the
process of a leadership programme.
* Help youth learn specific knowledge and skills related to
leadership.
*Enable youth to understand the history, values and beliefs of their
society.
*Facilitate the development of individual strengths and leadership
styles.
*Facilitate the development of ethics, values and ethical reasoning.
*Promote awareness, understanding, and tolerance of other people,
cultures and societies.
*Embody high expectations of, confidence in, and respect for the teens
served.
*Emphasize experiential learning and provide opportunities for genuine
leadership.
*Involve young people in service to others, to their community, their
country.
*Facilitate self-reflection and processing of learning both individually
and cooperatively.
*Involve youth in collaborative experiences, teamwork and networking
with peers.
*Involve youth in significant relationships with mentors, positive role
models.
*Be developed around stated purposes and goals.
All Leadership Development and Training programmes push each and
every participant to gain a rigorous personal insight into what makes
them tick and then, with that understanding of themselves, to stretch
their 'comfort zones' into new and challenging territory. This is the
one essential quality that anyone in any position of leadership must
develop. Whether the youth is running a company, running a service
organisation or running a home, he/she cannot excel unless thing are
seen from all points of view.
Once these 'seeing' skills are developed then the skills that make
things happen can be developed and finally get things unstuck, move
things forward. He/she can look at creating a vision, motivating and
inspiring others, setting clear agendas and supporting those who need to
help make the vision become a reality.
|