Use of fair value accounting
K.S. Welivita
Although fair value accounting has been a part of generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) since early 1990s, the use of fair value
measurements has increased steadily over the past decade, primarily in
response to investor demand for relevant and timely financial statements
that will aid in making better informed decisions.
Fair value accounting (also known as mark-to-market accounting) is a
financial reporting approach in which companies are required to measure
and report on an on going basis certain assets and liabilities
(generally financial instruments) at estimates of the prices they would
receive if they were to sell the assets or would pay if they were to be
relieved of the liabilities.
Accounting
Under fair value accounting, companies report losses when the fair
values of their assets decrease or liabilities increase. Those losses
reduce companies’ reported equity and may also reduce companies reported
net profit. International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) defines fair
value as “the amount for which an asset could be exchanged, a liability
settled, or an equity instrument granted could be exchanged, between
knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm’s length transaction”.
Fair value accounting is not limited to financial assets or financial
businesses. It can apply to any business, and with respect to a wide
variety of assets, liabilities and activities. Accountants presently use
a wide array of accrual and deferral methods in preparing financial
statements. Those methods are essentially mathematical calculation even
to a minute cent to get the precision. Nevertheless, Accountants who
continue to seek more precision are to be admired and encouraged.
The goal of fair value measurement is for firms to estimate as best
as possible the prices at which the positions they currently hold would
change hands in orderly transactions based on current information and
conditions. To meet this goal, firms must fully incorporate current
information about future cash flows and current risk-adjusted discount
rates in to their fair value measurements. The rationale for this
requirement is market price should reflect all publicly available
information about future cash flows, including investors’ private
information that is revealed through their trading as well as current
risk-adjusted discount rates. When fair values are estimated using
unadjusted or adjusted market prices, they are referred to as
mark-to-market values. If market prices for the same or similar
positions are not available, then firms must estimate fair values using
valuation models. When fair values are estimated using valuation models,
they are referred to as mark-to-model values.
The main issue with fair value accounting is whether firms can and do
estimates fair value accurately and without discretion. When identical
positions trade in liquid markets that provide unadjusted mark-to-market
values, fair value generally is the most accurate and least
discretionary possible measurement attribute, although even liquid
markets get values wrong on occasion. Fair values typically are less
accurate and more discretionary when they are either adjusted
mark-to-market values or mark-to-model values. In adjusting
market-to-market values, firms may have to make adjustments for market
illiquidity or for the dissimilarity of the position being fair valued
from the position for which the market price is observed. These
adjustments can be large and judgmental in some circumstances.
Valuation
In estimating mark-to-model values, firms typically have choice about
which valuation models to use and about which inputs to use in applying
the chosen models. All valuation models are limited, and different model
capture the value-relevant aspects of positions differently. Firms often
must apply valuation models using inputs derived from historical data
that predict future cash flows or correspond to risk-adjusted discount
rates imperfectly. The period’s firms chosen to analyze historical data
to determine these inputs can have very significant effects on their
mark-to-model values.
In principle, fair value accounting should be the best possible
measurement attribute for including firms’ management to make voluntary
disclosure and for making investors aware of the critical questions to
ask managements. When firms report unrealized gains and losses, their
management are motivated to explain in the Management Discussion and
Analysis sections of financial reports and elsewhere what went right or
wrong during the period and the nature of any fair value measurement
issues. If a firm’s management does not adequately explain their
unrealized gains and losses, then investors at least are aware that
value-relevant events occurred during the financial period and can prod
management to explain further.
Some financial institutions believe that fair value accounting forces
them to write down certain financial assets to a level below the value
they expect to recover in the long term. Further, they assert that these
write-downs compel them to curtail lending activities, preserving
capital solely to meet certain regulatory requirements.
Other stakeholders, including investors and auditors, believe that
properly applied fair value accounting provides the most transparent
picture of the relative financial condition of an organization. This
level of transparency enables investors to compare more effectively
similarly situated organizations.
Stock Exchange
To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements
and related disclosures, IASB establishes a fair value hierarchy for
assets or liabilities that prioritizes the inputs, or assumptions, used
in valuation techniques. Level 1 input are unadjusted quoted market
prices in active markets for identical items, such as quoted company
shares that trades on the Colombo Stock Exchange.
Market
Mark-to-market financial instruments are relatively easy if they are
actively traded in liquid markets. The problem becomes more complicated
if active markets do not exist. Particularly if a financial instrument
does a compound instrument comprise several embedded option like
features, values for which depend on inter-related default and price
risk characteristics. Moreover, in the absence of active liquid markets,
fair value is not well defined in the sense that an instrument’s
acquisition price, selling price, and value-in-use to the entity can
differ from each other.
Fair values may be used as an analytic tool in the lending process
and are compared with historical cost values. This historical cost
information, along with associate disclosures, contains reliable
information that provides insights into a firm’s cash flows.
Under the generally accepted accounting principles, credit
derivatives are generally required to recognize as an asset or liability
and measured at fair value, and gain or loss resulting from the change
in fair value must be recorded in earnings. Most credit derivatives do
not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, which would permit the gain
or loss on the credit derivatives to be reported in the same period as
the gain or loss on the position being hedge, assuming hedge is
effective. Therefore, the use of credit derivatives can result in
earnings volatility. It is also important to consider that the tax laws
governing purchase price allocations in taxable business acquisitions or
in certain asset exchanges may not follow applicable book principles.
There may be different valuation approaches or models that are permitted
under tax laws.
The alternative to fair value accounting generally is some form of
amortized cost accounting. In its pure form, amortized cost uses
historical information about future cash flows and risk-adjusted
discount rates from the inception of positions to account for them
throughout their lives on firms’ balance sheets and income statements.
Gains And Losses
Unlike under fair value accounting, unrealized gains and losses are
ignored until they realized through the disposal or impairment in value,
of positions or the passage of time. When firms dispose of positions,
they record the cumulative unrealized gains and losses that have
developed since the inception or prior impairment of positions on their
income statements.
The fair value regime represents an evolving accounting system which
has now permeated the regulatory environment and made its way into
social landscape. With the globalization of capital markets and advent
of complex financial instruments in use today, it has become apparent
that fair values of assets and liabilities are of greater interest to
investors than their historical costs. |