Promoting coherent units of management
Prof. Rajiva Wijesinha, MP
Over the years of conflict, a system arose in the East of separating
administrative divisions on ethnic grounds. There are therefore in
Kalmunai two Divisional Secretariats, within a few metres of each other,
one a Tamil Divisional Secretariat and the other a Muslim one.
I had come across this before, in Vavuniya, where the Vavuniya Town
and Vavuniya South Divisional Secretariats are practically on the same
road, but there the latter dealt with an area South of the town. Though
it was seen as the Sinhala Division, it served a distinct geographical
area and was situated where it was, outside that area, only because of
security problems in the past.
|
Fishing in
Pottuvil. File photo |
In the East the decision had been based on a desire, it seemed, to
provide separate services to separate communities, which seems to me a
way of entrenching separation. The same thing obtained in the Batticaloa
District, where Eravur is carved out of what is to all intents and
purposes Chenkaladi, with land issues still being referred to that
Divisional Secretariat. Something similar happens further North, where
Valaichenai is seen as a Tamil Divisional Secretariat, and there is
another smaller urban one next door which is primarily for Muslims.
Local politicians
All this I believe is not conducive to reconciliation, and it would
make sense, now that the conflict and the tensions it raised are largely
settled, to go back to units that are responsible for all our citizens
who live in a particular area. The officials I met seemed perfectly
capable of handling this, without inclining to one group or another,
though of course we will need to make sure that local politicians do not
seek to influence them in particular directions.
I hope the group working on delimitation will adopt such principles
in submitting its report to the Ministry of Public Administration. In
addition, I hope it will also lend more coherence to local
administrations by ensuring consistent boundaries for all government
agencies that work regionally. As it is, we find that the boundaries of
Divisional Secretariats, police divisions, educational zones or
divisions, health divisions etc vary, which sometimes prevents the
coordination that is essential.
With regard to education I found that, in some areas, the structures
are based on communal distinctions that seem to run counter to national
policy, and the affirmation, in both the National Human Rights Action
Plan and the LLRC Action Plan approved by Cabinet, of the need to
promote educational initiatives that ensure social integration. In the
Pottuvil area the Tamil schools come under the Tirukkovil Zone, and
Sinhala ones under the Amparai Zone. Muslim schools come under
Akkaraipattu, and while I can see that the creation of yet another Zone
might cause problems, given that Tirukkovil was established only
recently, it would seem preferable to expand that to include Pottuvil
too.
Monitoring nutrition levels
Ultimately though it would make sense to make education zones
coterminous with Divisional Secretariats, perhaps by upgrading what are
now Divisions, so that we have the same number of Zonal Education
Directors as Divisional Secretariats. This will allow for better
planning, and responsiveness to local needs, with responsibilities based
on consultation with parents. Such cohesion will also help to develop
the sense of community that we lack at present. It will also help with
teacher deployment, because statistics based on zones can be misleading.
I was for instance told recently in Cheddikulam that teacher shortages
in that area could not be addressed because the zone was overstaffed,
given the excesses in Vavuniya town.
The development of discrete units would also help to reduce problems
children face, which range beyond academic inequities. The Secretary to
the Ministry of Child Development and Women's Empowerment for instance
has proposed recently the establishment of a Child and Women's Affairs
Unit in each Divisional Secretariat. This would need the support not
only of officers concerned with the subject, but also the Police and
Education and Health officials.
Meanwhile the Health Ministry too is planning to set up a system to
ensure that all those working in relevant areas would share the
responsibility for ensuring that its requirements are met, with regard
for instance to monitoring nutrition levels. This also requires
cooperation, which would be much easier if the same group of senior
officials met regularly to develop suitable systems, instead of having
to work with a number of counterparts. For this purpose the
establishment of coterminous geographical areas of responsibility would
contribute to efficiency as well as accountability.
Political system
I should note again that the task of all these officials would be
much simpler if we also cleaned up our political system to save them
from having to serve several masters. While I think we need to revisit
the numbers of Pradeshiya Sabha and Provincial Council members the
present overlapping systems have created, we must also get rid of
multiple members of Parliament serving whole Districts, and instead work
towards having a single constituency member with full responsibility for
a particular area. Such a representative could readily develop close
links with one official responsible for every government function, and
thus help to build up teams that are better able to serve the population
he represents.
Such reforms may take time, but we should make a start when working
towards implementation of the expected proposals on delimitation. In the
process we should develop clear job descriptions and reporting
mechanisms for government officials, in particular those who coordinate
all functions. These coordinating officials include Grama Niladharis as
well as Divisional Secretaries, whose greater empowerment would be in
the interests of better delivery of services, given that they are the
basic interface between government and the people.
|