Timely planning and good action for Reconciliation
Delay and procrastination are not strangers to governance and
administration in Sri Lanka. Many of the issues faced by successive
governments have been caused by the failure to act in time on issues of
importance. Some of these delays have caused major crises for the
nation, while others have led to re-thinking of policy causing further
delay.
Yet, in an important aspect of national policy, which has everything
to do with the pressing need for success in post-conflict development
and reconciliation with far reaching political consequences, there are
good signs that action is being taken in time, with a carefully worked
out schedule of implementation.
This welcome departure, from what has become a malaise of
administrative delay in many spheres of activity, is clearly seen in the
National Action Plan on the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission
(LLRC), which was approved by Cabinet last week. The Committee headed by
Lalith Weeratunga, Secretary to the President, that worked on the plan
to implement the recommendations of the LLRC, have shown a remarkable
appreciation of the need for the most careful study of the
recommendations, which are of a far reaching nature, and the need for
the most practical way of implementing the more important
recommendations.
External Affairs Minister Prof.
G L Peiris |
Secretary to the President
Lalith Weeratunga |
In a good change from the attraction to secrecy that is often seen in
matters of administration, one saw a policy of sharing relevant
information with the public and the media, which can produce the best
results. The National Action Plan on the LLRC was quickly placed before
the public and all those genuinely interested, through both the local
and international media, no sooner it received Cabinet approval. This
was done with an invitation to the public as well as experts or those
with experience in the related fields of activity for their inputs to
make the implementation more realistic and effective.
Diplomatic community
Less than a week after the Action Plan was presented to the public,
it was also explained in detail to the diplomatic community in Sri
Lanka, with the opportunity for extensive discussions on the priorities
and strategies of implementation. At the meeting with the diplomat
community held at the Ministry of External Affairs, both External
Affairs Minister Prof. G L Peiris and Lalith Weeratunga, the hands-on
head of the implementation committee, had an informative and fruitful
interaction with diplomats, who had considerable interest in the LLRC
and its implementation.
The background to the implementation had already been clearly
explained by President Mahinda Rajapaksa, when he met key representative
of the local print and electronic media earlier this week. He said that
Sri Lanka had begun the process of implementing the LLRC's
recommendations much before those from abroad called for it to be done,
and a considerable amount of work was already under way.
As explained by Mr. Weeratunga, the National Action Plan lists out
implementation of recommendations according to Activity, Key Responsible
Agency, Key Performance Indicator and Time-frame.
It covers International Humanitarian Issues, Human Rights, Land
Return and Resettlement, Restitution/Compensatory Relief and
Reconciliation.
Fruitful suggestions
He was clear in stating that "We take LLRC recommendations very
seriously," when addressing media, and that the Action Plan was not
sacrosanct, stating that any fruitful suggestions were always welcome.
He said the committee has categorized 285 recommendations made by the
LLRC and many have already been implemented.
Addressing the concerns about the time-frame for implementation that
had been raised earlier in some quarters, Mr. Weeratunga told the media
and later to the diplomats that some of the recommendations will be
implemented this year while the others may be implemented next year
after the budget for 2013 is prepared, as the 2012 budget allocations to
the ministries had been done before the release of the LLRC report last
year.
At the meeting with diplomats Lalith Weeratunga explained in detail
the approach which his Committee adopted to the work they had
undertaken. He said the recommendations, capable of short term
implementation, had already been given effect, while work had begun in a
structured manner with regard to the longer term proposals.
Both Prof. Peiris and Mr. Weeratunga emphasized the importance of
acknowledging the substantial results already achieved on the ground
within a far shorter time span than had been necessary in post-conflict
situations in other parts of the world. This is of particular relevance
in the context of the significance consistently accorded by
international law and practice to domestic remedies and procedures, they
said.
LLRC recommendations
An LLRC sitting. File photo |
While the National Action Plan has now been revealed it is
significant to note that around 98 percent of the resettlement work had
already been completed while 90 percent of the rehabilitation had been
done. The demining process was also largely complete while only small
pockets remained.
Many, who were charging that the government had no interest in
implementing the LLRC recommendations or was deliberately delaying this
work, have been well answered by the detailed schedule of action that
the National Action Plan has presented, clearly laying down the Key
Responsible Agency, Key Performance Indicator and Time-frame for
implementation of each key recommendation. This approach goes beyond
many a government report, both in its practical approach to difficult
issues, and a determination to be bound by the necessity for effective
implementation within a given time frame.
This has special significance when the recommendations include
matters such as the right of any citizen of Sri Lanka to acquire land in
any part of the country, in accordance with its laws and regulations,
and reside in any area of his/her choice without any restrictions or
limitations; assure people through a publicity effort that the programme
on land policy seeks to make available land to all returning IDPs as
expeditiously as possible; is not a substitute for recourse to the
Courts of Law where people are in possession of valid legal proof of
their claim to the land in question; provide the needed human and
financial resources, supervise civil administration officers tasked with
the implementation of the programme by respective Government Agents and
monitor implementation quality at the national level by the Land
Commissioner General.
Similarly, the challenges of the LLRC recommendations on aspects of
International Humanitarian Law includes - to ascertain more fully the
circumstances under which specific instances of death or injury to
civilians could have occurred, and if such investigations disclose
wrongful conduct, prosecute and punish the wrongdoers; complete ongoing
disciplinary process being conducted in terms of Armed Forces statutes,
and upon conclusion follow up action to prosecute where relevant, and
conduct a professionally designed household survey covering all affected
families in all parts of the island to ascertain firsthand the scale and
circumstances of death and injury to civilians, as well as damage to
property during the period of the conflict.
Key issues
That the policy of openness followed in presenting the National
Action Plan before the public and its discussion with the diplomatic
community, has shown good results, is seen in the public debate it has
engendered on the key issues involved, and the statement from the United
States welcoming the release of the Action Plan, and stating its belief
that full implementation of the National Action Plan will benefit all
citizens of Sri Lanka by furthering long-term reconciliation and lasting
peace, which remains the key policy of the Sri Lanka government on the
LLRC. |