The issue of trafficking
I discussed recently three of the four problems with regard to women
raised in the last round of meetings of Divisional Secretariat
Reconciliation Committee meetings. The fourth I thought had to be looked
at separately, because it seemed extremely serious. This was an issue
raised by one of the Women Development Officers, about a complaint made
to her by a man whose wife had been offered an overseas job by an
employment agency.
It seemed that she had been taken to Colombo, after which he had lost
contact with her.
However he had heard that she was being kept there, the implication
being that this was for prostitution.
Similar stories abound, such as of girls from the estate sector being
brought to Colombo and moved from one house to another, and then being
lost sight of. This however was the first time I had been told such a
story from ground level as it were, and I have asked for further
details.
The Minister of Foreign Employment, to whom I mentioned the matter,
has promised to look into the matter carefully if details are supplied.
Sexual problems
I suspect such problems existed previously, but they seem to have
increased in frequency since the conclusion of the conflict.
Apart from there being more places full of women in need of
employment being opened up for exploitation, Colombo is seen as more
secure now, so tourism of all sorts is thriving.
I hasten to add that I do not subscribe to the view that sexual
problems spring entirely from the wickedness of foreigners, since we
know perfectly well that Sri Lankans are as capable as anyone else of
taking advantage of the vulnerable. But with a host of potential wealthy
customers also available, the temptation to build up businesses through
exploiting our unfortunate national passion for foreign employment has
increased substantially.
I will look later at the whole question of prostitution, about which
our laws continue to be coy so that it is the helpless who are remanded
or prosecuted. My focus here is the exploitation of those seeking other
work who end up being trafficked for immoral purposes - with some, it
should be noted, being used for sex as well as the employment they
expected, when domestic labour takes on additional meaning, both in Sri
Lanka and abroad.
Dealing with this is difficult, but I have no doubt that the
introduction, and enforcement, of systematic registration and
information sharing will help. In drafting the Human Rights Action Plan
we suggested that all workers going to other countries should be
registered there on arrival with our embassies, with a mandatory
requirement to contact them at intervals.
We were told that this might be difficult, given the need for the
cooperation of those countries, but I do not see why the onus should not
be placed on the employment agencies within Sri Lanka who have prepared
the contracts.
Checking could be done by better liaison between our emigration desks
at the airport, after collation of schedules of those proceeding abroad
for employment, and our missions abroad.
Untoward situations
It is possible that some names may slip through the net, but the
agencies should be made responsible for such lapses.
In addition, they should be required to ensure that those they send
are given training to be able to deal with untoward situations. I know
that the ministry has made considerable advances in this field, with
much better training now for migrant workers, but this should be made
mandatory, with the obligation to ensure this vested in the agencies.
Protection committees
Such systems could be developed also with regard to the transport of
labour within the country. Before the recent complaint in Vavuniya, I
was told in Mannar of women arriving there at night, to a bus station
that had an infamous reputation.
Some of these it seemed had assumed they were being sent into
domestic employment, but they found themselves being dragooned into
prostitution.
Deprived of the possibility of communicating with their families,
they ended up having to accept the situation into which they were
thrust.
Registration at local level of those going away for employment should
also therefore be arranged, with those arranging positions made
responsible for ensuring continuing communication.
I do not think this should be made mandatory, since that would be
unwarranted interference in general freedom of mobility, but the
Protection Committees we have suggested in each Grama Niladhari Division
could advise all those thinking of domestic employment, either within
Sri Lanka or abroad, of precautions to ensure that lines of
communication are kept open.
Counselling could also be arranged as to how to deal with problems
that might arise.
The Protection Committees could also help to keep an eye on the
families of those going away for work, and also help with readjustment
when migrant workers return.
I am aware that the ministry has arranged for an excellent facility
near the airport to support those coming back, but often problems emerge
only later, and it would be useful if a monitoring mechanism was in
place locally to check if psycho-social or other counselling were needed
subsequent to return. This cannot be arranged through a central agency,
which is why local support groups are vital.
Increasingly, listening to the problems raised at our Reconciliation
Committee meetings, I am convinced of the need to promote local
structures and responsibilities, with central or provincial governments
providing the services that are identified as necessary, whether through
the Police or through social interventions. The evils of trafficking are
best dealt with through constant vigilance, which requires a system of
personal connections and clear responsibilities.
While legal provision should be made to hold those arranging
employment responsible for safety, community support to monitor this
will be invaluable. |