‘UNESCO’s future and the challenge for the South’
Full statement of Ambassador Dayan Jayatilleka at UNESCO Headquarters
Paris, June 14, 2012 Looking at it from the point of view of the South,
I see that UNESCO has the strength to regain the initiative. This is
demonstrated with the vote on Palestine. We did something that almost
nobody else has done for quite some time. Let us never forget that
potentiality. Let us never be trapped in negativism and fatalism.
Recognizing that potentiality, however, does not preclude us from also
recognizing the crisis of UNESCO and the crisis the South faces within
UNESCO.
UNESCO has become a target. This is not the result of conspiracy but
the result of a systemic re-modeling; a byproduct of the world system.
UNESCO has been transformed from a subject into an object. We can see
this transparently if we examine the dismantling of the institutional
spaces for thinking within UNESCO.
Outstanding intellectuals
Over a period of years, the institutional spaces for the practice of
philosophy, of ethics, of reflections, of ideas - the ‘laboratory of
ideas’ function of UNESCO- has been dismantled and dispersed. One could
put it up on a chart and track this dispersal, diversion and
dismantling.
|
Ambassador
Dayan Jayatilleka |
UNESCO has been and is being gradually lobotomized and we have done
nothing so far to challenge this! While the function of reflection, of
deep thinking has been atomized, on the other hand UNESCO is been
transformed and is sought to be transformed into a soft power accessory,
an auxiliary of the hegemonic centres and ideologies.
This is why UNESCO identified itself uncritically with the one
dimensional conception of the Arab Spring: not a critical one, not a
dialectical one, not a deep thinking reflection but precisely a one
dimensional conception.
So UNESCO has been politicized but in one sense and we have not
resisted or challenged this. We must stop this transformation of UNESCO,
this conscious transformation of UNESCO, into a mere conduit and
disseminator of hegemonic ideologies which also appropriate notions of
Human Rights and distort them as part of an interventionist project.
This global interventionist project has been discussed today by Prof
Jean Bricmont and Michel Collon among others.
The philosophical function of UNESCO almost no longer exists. Michel
Colon quoted quite accurately from Régis Debray. Régis Debray lives in
Paris and I know he is somewhat reclusive but still, Régis Debray is one
of the many outstanding intellectuals who we do not see at UNESCO. I do
not know if he would come if invited, but has anyone invited him? Why is
it that UNESCO in 1951 had Jean Paul Sartre discussing the ethics of
violence but UNESCO in 2012 does not reach out, for most of the time, to
the outstanding intellectuals within Paris and in France, let alone in
the rest of Europe - because there are no budgetary constraints really
in doing so, but it is not done.
So the thinking function, the critical thinking function, the
function of reflection is deliberately being ‘disappeared’. Now is this
the result of financial crisis? Yes and no because well before the
post-Palestinian induction cuts, the budgetary issue has been used in a
neo-liberal manner, as it has been in some of our countries at certain
times where budget cuts are made. Now who decides on the priorities?
Certain programs, institutional spaces are dispersed, are cut back in
the name of rationalization. But it is really a counter-reformation that
has been proceeding, a long counter-reformation within and of UNESCO,
taking it away from the founding values and functions that inspired the
organization.
The task for the South is to counter that counter-reformation.
Global information
For lack of time I will refer to only one very serious problem.
UNESCO has also been subject to a massive ideological barrage as a
result of which we do not look at our own history in a balanced and
critical manner.
I refer to the period in which UNESCO was at the forefront of the
battle for a new international information order - and the importance of
information, of examining the hegemonic structures of global information
as part of the striving for peace and against war, has been mentioned by
Michel Collon among others, today.
UNESCO shies away as if Director-General M’Bow was Satan Incarnate!
It is possible that there were certain excesses, certain unilateralism,
and certain over-emphases during that period, but today while we must
firmly uphold the struggle for the freedom of expression and the rights
of individual journalists, we must simultaneously look at the hegemonic
structures and global information order.
This is a critique and project which UNESCO stood at the forefront
of, but we are not doing this, we have not done this, we have been
almost brainwashed or hypnotized into thinking that this was a dark age
of UNESCO and that we must never go back there.
But that is surely part of our heritage that we must be proud of, and
we must look back at the Sean Macbride report, reflect upon that period
where UNESCO put the study of the international information order on the
agenda.
In conclusion, I propose a few ideas..
One, a very prosaic one: closer, structured cooperation between G77
and China and the Non Aligned Movement within UNESCO. There is surely an
overlap but there has to be closer structured liaison and coordination.
Two, as I said before, we must reexamine or reintroduce into the agenda
the theme of information and its unequal sources and structures; the
unequal exchange for information between North and South.
Three, we must take up the flagship theme of the New Humanism but we
should do it from the point of view and perspective of the Global South.
In my own reading, the first time I came across the phrase new humanism,
not in capitals, has been in the unabridged Prison Notebooks of Antonio
Gramsci and I suggest that the countries of the Global South have a
session in which the New Humanism would be looked up from the
perspective of the regions of the South, and of the South as a whole.
|