Freedom - the Liberal perspective
Speech of Prof Rajiva Wijesinha, MP, chairman,
Council of Asian Liberals and Democrats at the ceremony to present the
2011 Liberal International Freedom Prize to Dr Chee Soon Juan of the
Singapore Democratic Party
Dr Chee I have known for a mere decade and a half, when he was
setting out on his then very lonely struggle to liberalise Singaporean
politics. As you know he suffered for this more than those who had
engaged in oppositional politics in the period immediately preceding. At
the time Singapore got its independence of course harsh measures were
the norm, the Singapore government like its British predecessor jailing
anyone who was even remotely committed to leftist politics.
Singapore’s 2011 Presidential candidate Tan Jee Say with Prof
Rajiva Wijesinha, MP at the ceremony to present the Liberal
International Freedom Prize to Dr Chee Soon Juan of the
Singapore Democratic Party. They first met 38 years ago when
both were students at University College Oxford. Prof Wijesinha
was the Liberal Party candidate at Sri Lanka’s Presidential
election in 1999. |
The reason Dr Chee was treated so badly however was because he took
on the Singapore regime on its own terms. Indeed he could have been a
favoured son of that regime had he not believed that freedom is not only
about economic freedom but also about political and social freedom. From
a Liberal standpoint, asserting the importance of all freedoms, he
exposed the pretensions of the People’s Action Party.
Liberal principles
Sadly those pretensions still take in many people who see themselves
as belonging to the Liberal family. The continuing celebration of
Singapore in indices that take no account of political authoritarianism
is sad, and it is for that reason that I am doubly thankful to Liberal
International for making so powerful a statement about the need for
consistency in our advocacy of Liberal principles.
Our pride in Dr Chee extends also then to pride in Liberal
International for so forcefully expressing its truly international
spirit. This follows on the award a few years back to Sam Rainsy of
Cambodia, again an example of Liberal International indicating its
understanding of the courage he displayed in standing up to an
authoritarian regime. But in the case of Dr Chee, it has been even
harder to establish what he has been up against, because of the far more
subtle ways in which the Singapore government stifles dissension.
I first realized this when I was told about the manner in which Dr
Chee was dismissed from his post at the university. Some good friends of
my family who had lived and worked in Singapore for years, who were
strong supporters of the government, nevertheless made it clear that the
charges against Dr Chee were trumped up and ridiculous. Since then he
has suffered bankruptcy through legal proceedings which otherwise
liberal members of the international community treat as sacrosanct, an
indulgence they would not bestow on countries such as Cambodia or Burma.
Democratic activity
In recalling another winner from Asia of the Liberal International
Prize for Freedom, Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, I should note another reason
for satisfaction tonight, in that it seems the long freeze on democratic
activity in Burma is finally beginning to thaw.
I know there is a long way to go, I know that many pitfalls lie
ahead, but I am glad that CALD last year decided to take the opportunity
to engage with her. Her willingness to engage with those who treated her
so badly, to talk to them with hope whilst still asserting the
principles she upheld for so long, is truly admirable, and I hope this
will be crowned with further success.
Similarly, I am pleased that the results of the last Singapore
general election indicate that that freeze too is thawing. Those were
followed by the Presidential election in which for the first time ever a
majority of Singaporeans indicated their dissatisfaction with the
monolithic hold the People’s Action Party has exercised so long on the
body politic.
Jee Say will appreciate the fact that one of his contemporaries who
is now working in Cambodia, in apprising me of the results, suggested
that he thought some manipulation had occurred. That may simply be
University College solidarity, but I believe that the result has
established quite clearly that the Singapore Democrat Party will soon
move to more tangible successes.
My congratulations then to Dr Chee, to Jee Say, and to the Singapore
Democrat Party. And my congratulations too to the Council of Asian
Liberals and Democrats and to Liberal International, for it is truly an
honour to be associated with all of you here in Singapore in your long
and difficult but unstoppable journey to a liberal democratic future. |