How Tiger rump expands on what McDonagh’s researcher claimed
Prof. Rajiva Wijesinha, MP
Siobhain McDonagh
|
The Sri Lanka Guardian has now jumped into the fray with an article
on the meeting held in the House of Commons on October 12th to screen
‘Lies Agreed Upon’, the rebuttal of the latest Channel 4 film on Sri
Lanka. This was an unexpected bonus, because it makes even more obvious
the networking between those opposed to the Sri Lankan government and
Tamils who do not suppose the rump Tiger terrorists.
They show their hand openly here in highlighting their animosity and
fear regarding Mrs Rajeswary, who has been fearless in combating
terrorism. The headline of the Sri Lanka Guardian article was ‘Famous
Tamil ‘Drama Queen’ defends Sri Lanka war crimes’. It is claimed that
this was by their ‘Correspondent in London’, but it is in fact mainly a
doctored regurgitation of what appeared in Tamil on what they term the
‘Swiss based Athirvu website that intruded the event’.
Channel 4
The intruder had signed himself in as Daran, a researcher for the
Labour Party MP Siobhain McDonagh, though he told me that he was a
freelance journalist called Canaa, and later tried to deny that he was a
researcher for the lady. The High Commission described him as an LTTE
supporter called Canaan, but it is possible that he was simply a
misguided young man who got involved with terrorists when they seemed on
the ascendant. Certainly he told me that he was responsible for the
telecast of what purported to be an interview with Dr Shanmugarajah,
that was used to spread horror during the last stages of the conflict.
Having however told me that he would send me the visuals that went along
with that interview, he got cold feet and told me ‘This is Daran, after
careful consideration, I cant give you that entire video. But I have
attached the sample one’.
I suspect this was because, had he sent me what he had promised, it
would have revealed from where Channel 4 had got much of its material.
However, perhaps as compensation, he sent me another clip, which seems
as blatant an example of doctoring as what Channel 4 had shown, even
though Daran persisted in claiming that it had not been edited.
But editing selectively is the speciality of these frauds. I
reproduce here the text of the Sri Lanka Guardian, with contradictory
sections from the translation I got of the original Athirviru article
highlighted in brackets (though it can be seen that even that article
was internally self-contradictory). What actually happened can be seen
in the article entitled ‘Siobhain McDonagh’s researching journalist’
(dumbfounded silence indeed) on my blog,
www.rajivawijesinha.wordpress.com and on the video of the event that can
be seen on www.youtube.com/rajivawijesinha - extracts from this that
contradict what Athirviru and the Sri Lanka Guardian say are in italics,
and their accuracy can be seen on the video).
British parliamentarians
Incidentally, it was the Sri Lanka Guardian that originally tried to
suggest that the House of Commons meeting was arranged by Bell Pottinger,
and that Liam Fox was involved in stopping Channel 4 from talking about
it, or some such nonsense - part of what I described as the irresistible
attack on Liam Fox, which seems to have originated with someone passing
on to the Guardian a photograph taken in Sri Lanka. The anxious efforts
to suggest that he lost his job because of the Sri Lankan connection
make clear the message the Tiger rump wishes to send out.
(October 17, London, Sri Lanka Guardian)
The meeting arranged by the Sri Lanka High Commission in the
Portcullis House in the British Parliament on the 12th (Wednesday)
October 2011 was a embarrassing flop for the government of Sri Lanka.
Secretly organized meeting was a disaster waiting to happen and the
organizers are maintaining dumbfounded silence about the outcome of the
event.
According to the Tamil intruders in the meeting who are opposed to
the LTTE cause, the event attended by the majority Sinhalese and few
Tamils patronized by the Sri Lankan government was odious grapes to
swallow.
The Swiss based Athirvu website that intruded the event gave
graphical account of the event and translation of which is produced
herein:
‘Sri Lanka’s counter programme against C4 has been a failure’
‘Channel 4 telecasted a revealing 30 minute documentary ‘Sri Lanka’s
Killing Fields’. It was seen by many countries and shown in many
Parliaments. It caused considerable setback for Sri Lanka. To overcome
this, Sri Lanka too produced its own documentary. It attempted to show
it for the first time in the Britain. It wanted to show it before the
British parliamentarians day before yesterday. Many Tamils were keen to
go there and view it and wanted to ask questions. Knowing this will
happen, the government of Sri Lanka restricted the event only for the
British parliamentarians.
‘As a result Tamils could not participate and raise questions.
However three Tamils carefully managed to creep into the venue. The
reporter of the Athirvu website was one of them. The documentary was
shown first. Time was allocated for the audience to ask questions after
the programme. Only four British MP’s attended. Out of the four, three
left the venue at the outset. Only with one MP the documentary was
shown.
(Two versions in Athirvu - Four British MPs were present during the
screening of the video but three of them left the hall in the middle of
the event..... It was interesting to note that only four British MPs
attended at this event and they fell into sleep immediately after few
minutes of commencing the screening.)
Athirvu reporter
There was instruction that no one from C4 should be allowed. However,
a C4 journalist who was involved in the production of their ‘Killing
Fields’ asked embarrassing questions.
'Following her, Aithirvu reporter was given the opportunity to ask
questions. He asked: 'You have produced a documentary to counter the C4
to get the support from Western countries, why can't you allow an
independent inquiry demanded by the West? Whilst the presenter
maintained silence Hansa (Deputy High Commissioner) from the first row
butted in and took photograph and video recording of the Athirvu
reporter with the view to threaten him.
(When the Sri Lankan spokesperson avoided a direct answer to that
question Mr. Amza who was seated in the front row intimidated the
journalist by indicating that he is being videographed.)
However, the Athirvu reporter went on to ask another question.
'Soon after this, another Tamil rose up and condemned the comment of
generalizing every actions of the Tamils as Tamil terrorism. Prof.
Rajiva Wijesinha apologised if he had inferred terrorism generally on
the Tamils.
C4 documentary
'There were about 150 Sinhalese and only three Tamils. She also
blamed the leadership of the LTTE.' The others, Tamil as well as
British, who made a similar point are ignored) Whenever Tamils raised a
question, the Sinhalese shouted, humiliated and insulted them (See
previous paragraph for internal contradiction)
Another blatant falsehood was the claim that one of the Tamils
present condemned me for talking about 'Tamil terrorists'. In fact, as
the video footage makes clear, he was talking about an intervention from
the floor, and I in fact supported his plea and asked that all of us,
however emotional we felt, make a distinction between the terrorist
Tigers and the Tamils, whose welfare as equal citizens of Sri Lanka must
be supported).
Even when the C4 lady was asking questions, they were behaving like
this. 'When the event came to an end, the Tamils attempted to leave the
venue and the Sinhalese surrounded them and expressed their protest.
The Athirvu reporter and two others got out together and told their
experience to the other reporters (I believe it was written by the young
man called Daran whom I had befriended at the event, who told me that he
was a freelance journalist called Canaa, but who turned out to have
entered the event as a researcher for the Labour MP Siobhain McDonagh.)
'The pro government tail wagging Tamil woman Rajeswary (known as
Drama Queen) was saying Tamils should be allowed to live peacefully and
the C4 documentary will only help to seed another war in Sri Lanka. She
went on to slam the Tamil Tigers and its leadership.
'Overall, Sri Lanka's documentary against C4 was utter failure for
Sri Lanka. Though 150 Sinhalese attended, three Tamils caused havoc
there'.
|