Networks of Informers:
Stories the Darusman Report would not hear
Prof Rajiva Wijesinha, MP
The University Teachers for Human Rights, whose reports are a mine of
information about what happened in the North during the conflict, have
sections called ‘Bearing Witness’. These give personal accounts of
people caught up in the conflict.
These are particularly useful, because one feels that UTHR has no
particular axe to grind in quoting from such sources. They present a
range of viewpoints, and while obviously one cannot be sure that all
accounts are accurate, it is clear that UTHR does not doctor what they
hear, or seek to present a particular perspective. This seems to me
unlike many other reports, usually by journalists, which produce
evidence to emphasize their own predilections.
During my recent visit to the North, having looked carefully at
various sites that figure prominently in recent critiques of government
action, I thought it might be useful to talk to people who had lived
through the last few months of conflict in the No Fire Zones. I spoke to
three people at the Mullaitivu GA’s office, to two families at
Suthanthirapuram and at the Udaiyaarkadu hospital, and to two people at
the Vallipuram school that had been used as a hospital. On the next day,
I spoke to 18 people at the last two sections in Manik Farm which still
house the displaced.
Many had only come out at the very end, though a few had got away in
April in the first great exodus. One enterprising old man had walked out
on March 16th, while two had escaped by sea. One had got away reasonably
early together with her husband and a couple of children, paying Rs
200,000 for passage for the whole family. A few weeks later the price
had been Rs 200,000 for one person. The school teacher who had got away
thus, along with his brother, told me however that the Sri Lankan forces
had fired on their boat, killing several, before registering that they
were not Tigers. They had then apologized, and treated the survivors
well.
Not a single instance of women or children being killed
This was the only story I was told of casualties during escape from
the Zone. In fact, apart from stories of individual deaths in a few
other cases, this was the only account of people having lost their
lives. None of the people I spoke to gave a single instance of women or
children being killed. Seven men I spoke to in Ananda Coomaraswamy
village in Manik Farm had all got away during the last few weeks with
their entire families, one of them with seven children - and a few
grandchildren - all now living. Of the seven women I spoke to, four were
widows, but two of the husbands had died earlier, of fever and a fall
from a tree respectively. All their children had survived, five in one
case.
I spoke to only four people in Kadirgamar Village, including a man
with three small children all of whom had come out safely. There was
also an older man on his own, and a young man who was not married but
whose whole family had also survived. The woman I spoke to had also lost
her husband, but she had brought her children out safely.
Assumption strengthened
It is not I think a coincidence that, of these 18 individuals, no
family members had died except adult men. One of them seemed, from the
way his wife described his death, to have fought with the LTTE, though
the other two we were told had died from shells. My assumption seemed
strengthened by the story of the family at Udaiyaarkadu, which had seven
sons. Six of them had survived, along with their families, and their
mother and a single unmarried sister. The only death had been of the
sixth son, who according to his eldest brother and their mother had
joined the LTTE. I got the impression, from a slight trace of
disapproval, that this had been voluntary, but it is possible that he
was the sacrifice the family had made when the LTTE demanded one person
from each family.
The family at Suthanthirapuram had also survived intact, a mother and
two daughters and the family of the elder one. The husband of the other
was a young man from Nawalapitiya who to my initial surprise knew
nothing of the situation. It turned out that he had gone to visit a
relation in the Camp at Manik Farm after the conflict ended, and had met
his future wife there, and married her and moved to Mullaitivu. This was
not however unusual, because a fair number of those I spoke to turned
out to have moved there from the south of the country, after the
problems that followed the advent to power of the Jayewardene
government.
Appalling behaviour
Most of those I spoke to were very positive about government, though
this could well have been because they thought this was what I wanted to
hear. The details they gave about the appalling behavior of the LTTE
however suggested deep feeling. One of them said categorically that the
LTTE did not distribute the food that was sent, it arrived and was then
whisked away, and that food had to be bought at astronomical prices.
Most appalling was the testimony as regards Vallipuram hospital, into
which we were told the LTTE brought weapons to fire at the forces. They
loaded them on tractors, and fired from amongst civilians, and them
moved elsewhere and fired again.
I had read in several accounts that this technique was used
repeatedly by the LTTE, but it came across the more forcefully when
described by an eye witness.
In such a situation it is remarkable that the only allegations
against the forces with regard to this hospital are one shell on January
21, with no reported casualties, and two shells in the compound on the
22nd, resulting in five deaths.
With regard to Udaiyaarkadu, the family living next door assured us
that the hospital itself had not been hit, though they noted that shells
had hit the compound. I was surprised by this because a corner of the
hospital had suffered damage, but they said that this had happened
afterwards, when there were no patients there. Certainly the tiny
anteroom that had been damaged was not likely to have housed patients at
any point.
ICRC
The ICRC had informed the government on January 24 that one shell had
hit the hospital while another had exploded at the proximity of the
hospital compound. It said, but only citing ‘hospital authorities’, that
the first shell had led to five killed. TamilNet claimed on the same day
that shells exploded inside the hospital premises and added that ‘At
least 60 shells exploded behind the hospital premises (Udaiyaarkadu
school) around 3.45 pm. Four civilians were killed on the spot’.
This suggests that the ICRC communication refers to what took place
behind the hospital premises but, since the building used as a hospital
was not a school, one wonders what exactly was going on. It would seem
that this was a situation in which even more sleight of hand than usual
was employed.
Examination of the hospital building will make crystal clear that the
claims advanced are inaccurate, though it is certainly possible that a
shell fell near the hospital and claimed some lives.
Finally I should note what we were told about the Vallipuram school,
from which many youngsters had been taken to Sencholai, where they died
in a bomb attack by the airforce. TamilNet had claimed at the time that
61 schoolgirls were killed in a bomb on a children’s home compound,
while attending a ‘residential course on Leadership, Self-Awareness and
First Aid workshop’.
The story was changed
It will be remembered that initially it was claimed that an orphanage
had been bombed. When it was pointed out that the orphanage had been
closed several years previously, the story was changed. But photographs,
confirmed by some of the survivors, made it clear that the girls were in
military fatigues and were being trained for combat.
This was confirmed by the witness who said the LTTE would drill
students in the school premises, having sent the principal and teachers
away. The students were then taken for further military training, the
girls to Sencholai, the boys to other places.
What is horrifying is that the various aid agencies present in the
Vanni throughout this period made no protest about this behavior, and
did not try to stop this abuse of children, and probably of the funding
that the LTTE had obtained from UNICEF to rehabilitated former child
soldiers.
In Vallipuram it seemed the students forced to train were as young as
13. |