Majority in this country eat rice
When it comes to matters of governance in Sri Lanka, there is a pithy
Sinhala saying that 'Me Rate Inne Bath Kana Minissu'. This denotes that
the majority in this country eats rice instead of grass or fodder and
therefore the course the country takes in keeping with majority
aspirations has to be in the right direction. Democracy is all about
people's aspirations and thus those who respect democracy, including
those who claim to, have little alternative but to respect the wishes of
the people and uphold their sovereignty in matters of governance.
It is in this context that the wider global community have to view
this controversial Darusman Report, now before them, seeking to
castigate the Sri Lankan government with allegations of 'violating
International Humanitarian Law and for committing crimes against
humanity'. Thus the verdict of the people of Sri Lanka is what matters
as they are the best judge of the situation in deciding whether human
rights of the people on this country have been violated to an extent
that warrants an international inquiry in to the activities of its
forces during the last stage of the conflict with the LTTE. Even morally
such a stand is tenable because it is the people of Sri Lanka that
suffered through the shenanigans of the LTTE and also of the government
forces during their operations against the LTTE. And therefore it is the
people who are in a position to pass judgment as to the excess of one
against the other.
JVP insurrection
In the larger picture the people in this country also experienced the
government forces when they overcame armed threats posed to the
democratically elected government, by the JVP in 1971 and in 1989. The
JVP, just as the LTTE had its own share of grievance but their armed
revolt too was crushed by the forces at both those instances quite
effectively. The message again is that the legitimate government of a
country cannot entertain anarchy that seeks to overpower the will of the
people and destabilize the country. Both those situations however, were
also instances where the forces took full control until normalcy was
restored and sooner such normalcy was restored the better it was for the
people because that limited the uninhibited power of the forces to
reign.
Signing a petition against the flawed Darusman Report.
Picture by Mahinda Vithanachchi |
Nevertheless, those instances were situations where extra judicial
states reigned in the country and under such circumstances it is always
possible that excesses would occur. But again it is the people of this
country who should stand in judgment on those excesses and decide
whether the situation warranted such excesses. We are particularly aware
that during the second JVP insurrection in 1989 there were large scale
excesses often going beyond justification, but still the majority of the
people in this country bore those excesses and voted the same party into
office at the 1989 elections. Ironically, not even an internal inquiry,
leave alone a Darusman Report, was called for by those with pretensions
on 'human rights'.
The UNP government was in power then and may be their political
lineage to the Western block was strong enough to make the West ignore
such excesses. The motto of the 'international community' then seemed to
be that 'human rights or human wrongs, after all it is our political
ally'.
Colonial powers
Now this same block of Western nations are engaged in a 'witch-hunt'
against Sri Lanka alleging that human rights were violated even
disregarding the fact that such allegations were turned down initially
by the UN protocol. What the people in this country and the global
community should bear in mind is that this self styled 'international
community' is made up of former colonial powers who pillaged and
plundered small countries for centuries violating human rights and hence
they may still entertain ambitions to dominate world affairs. In the
present day world this exploitation is less physical, more economical
and psychological and the tools too have changed to trade barriers and
propaganda. It is in this context that we have to view the objective of
this Darusman Report that the West has now aimed at Sri Lanka.
On May 1 the ruling government party staged a massive rally, more or
less to get the message across to the Western block that the government
has the backing of the people. Further the ruling party has now won all
the elections that were held, resoundingly putting the people's support
to the post war government beyond doubt. The war effort and its eventual
victory, in any case has been so popular in the country that even the
Opposition UNP had to borrow a 'war hero' whom it castigated before, as
its candidate at the post war elections.
All this points to the reality that the people in this country are
fully aware of the; shenanigans of terrorist activities and the anarchy
such actions could usher; the excesses of the armed forces and the
consequence of overlooking such excesses. Just as law and order is
important to a country so are basic human rights of the people, but what
is important is that none of those should be tainted with political
interests, locally or internationally. If the West respect democracy
they have to respect the will of the people in this country. People in
Sri Lanka are quite capable of deciding for themselves and the majority
of them eat rice instead of grass of fodder.
[email protected]
|