Nuclear power to generate energy: Is it feasible?
Dr Mathu H Liyanage
The feasibility of preventing or at least
mitigating global warming by adopting nuclear power has ignited the
debate on the use of nuclear energy in the wake of Japan’s spectacular
explosion at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant caused by the ferocious
earthquakes in recorded history and the three-foot tsunami wave
The Chernobyl disaster occurred on April 26, 1986 at the
Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine. Picture courtesy:
Google
|
Global warming is caused by nature itself as well as man-made
problems. One natural cause is the release of methane gas, a greenhouse
gas, from arctic tundra and wetlands. The other is caused by the earth
going through a cycle of climate change which lasts about 40,000 years.
The man-made problems such as pollution caused by burning fossil
fuels made of organic matter, coal or oil, generating greenhouse gas CO2
(carbon dioxide), and releasing of methane into the atmosphere by mining
coal and oil, do the greatest damage. Population is yet another factor.
More people means more food, tilling of more land for food, rearing of
animals such as cows, sheep, goats on farmland for manure and dairy
products increase methane in the atmosphere considerably. It also
involves more methods of transport, motor vehicles and railways.
We breathe out CO2, and trees which convert CO2 to oxygen are felled
(deforestation) as more land is prepared for agriculture and for
building houses and articles of furniture.
These activities build up the
methane gas to significant levels. Besides, carbon dioxide and methane
are released as a result of decay of food, vegetation and paper dumped
in landfills and when sewage wastes break down. Many industrial
processes such as cement and liquid natural gas production, and coal
mining produce or emit a variety of greenhouse gases. The first five
countries ranked as the great polluters by 2007 emissions are: See table
1
The conventional or traditional energy sources consist primarily of
coal, natural gas and oil formed from decaying plant and animal material
over hundreds of thousands to millions of years.
Most of them are burned to produce energy through power plants and
automobiles. In fact, conventional sources of energy made the Industrial
Revolution possible, starting with the textile industry in the 18th
Century and the modern society.
The most significant characteristic of these energy sources is that
they are non-renewable and would be reduced to zero over the years. The
renewable energy, on the other hand, is energy that comes from natural
resources such as sunlight, wind, rain, tides and geothermal heat which
are naturally replenished or renewed.
It is interesting to note that during the five-year period, 2005 to
2009, worldwide renewable energy capacity grew at rates of 10 to 60
percent annually for most technologies. See table 2
It is reported that in 1908, about 19 percent of global final energy
consumption came from renewables, 13 percent from biomass (plant
material) used for heating, 3.2 percent from hydroelectricity while new
renewables like modern biomass, biofuels (bioethanol - an alcohol made
by fermenting the sugar components of plants mostly from sugar and
starch crops) and biodiesel made from vegetable oils, animal fats or
recycled greases, small hydro, wind, solar and geothermal - the energy
is obtained by tapping the heat of the earth from the deep earth’s crust
in volcanically active locations.
To be continued
|