Politics of Galle Literary Festival
Prof Rajiva Wijesinha
I had been told about the call by Reporters beyond Borders that the
Festival be boycotted, on the grounds that media freedom in Sri Lanka is
under threat. I had also been sent the robust critique of that call on
Groundviews, a media outlet that exemplifies the freedom the media in
Sri Lanka enjoys.
With regard to the Festival itself, I believe it is of great benefit
to Sri Lanka. When the Festival was started, way back in 2007 I think,
there was much criticism in various quarters, including that it was
basically a money making exercise for its founder, Geoffrey Dobbs. But
there should be no objection to people making money, so long as they
provide services to others that give value for money. It seemed to me
that Dobbs was doing that.
Prof Rajiva Wijesinha |
A second objection was that the Festival had nothing really to do
with Sri Lanka. This seemed to me a more valid objection, since in that
first year there were I believe no Sri Lankan writers involved,
excepting expatriates. It was also difficult, given the cost of events,
for most Sri Lankans not out of the top financial bracket to attend.
Given the other criticisms, including claims of sharp practice, I
thought it best not to raise questions publicly, since I knew nothing of
the details, but I did call someone who had been involved and mentioned
the second objection above. To my surprise, there was very positive
action about this the following year.
Sri Lankan writers
A bright young lady from India, who was in charge of some of the
arrangements for 2008, called to ask about Sri Lankan writers and they
featured a great many of them that year, including Jean Arasanayagam and
Punyakante Wijenaike. This has continued over the years, with Yasmine
Gooneratne becoming a Patron of the festival, while Sinhala and Tamil
writers have also participated.
This year for instance, if I have read aright, A Santhan from Jaffna
(whom I had recommended in 2008) and Amarakeerthi Liyanage from
Peradeniya will take part.
Secondly, they began a scheme in 2008 of giving cut-price tickets to
students. I believe many have benefited from this and that the practice
still continues. Of course the ordinary cost continues high, but the
majority of those who attend do not find this excessive and believe they
are getting good value for their money. And for the many foreigners who
attend, the costs are very low, for the great spread of literary talent
they are exposed to.
Tourism industry
This is another of the benefits to the country and we should be
particularly grateful to the organizers for keeping the event going
during the years when foreigners were being advised not to come to Sri
Lanka. Those who ignored the warnings found that threats to them were
minimal and many travelled elsewhere in the country too, which helped
our flagging tourism industry. They also spread the word and since they
belonged to the category of high-spending traveller, any impact they
might have had would have been extremely helpful.
Some of the participants at last year’s Galle Literary
Festival. File photo |
Scuttling such benefits to the country may be one reason for the
extraordinary demarche of the Reporters. But I believe there is another
reason too, which is that the last few weeks have seen a great increase
in criticism of Sri Lanka by those NGOs that follow trends, regardless
of consistency. Just a couple of nights ago, for instance, the BBC in
London rang me up to ask about the most recent effusion of Sam Zarifi of
Amnesty International, while just before that the BBC in Colombo had
wanted me to comment on a report by Minority Rights Group International.
False information
The timing of all this is not coincidental. This week Sri Lanka
presents in Geneva its report on the Convention to Eliminate
Discrimination Against Women. And then there is the regular meeting of
the Council in Geneva in March, before which those who are bitter
against Sri Lanka believe that the UN Secretary General’s Panel will
unveil a report on the basis of which they can bring a hostile
resolution. Building up feeling against us might help to sway votes if,
now that memories are fading of the forceful and broad coalition
Ambassador Jayatilleka built up, another attempt is made to condemn us.
If that is the game plan, it is not surprising that the Reporters
have ignored the fact that the Galle Literary Festival in fact provides
a forum for those who wish to attack the Government.
Indeed, those who delight in conspiracy theories might well claim
that the Government has fed the Reporters false information in order to
destroy a centre of dissent. Understandably, given the social background
of the Sri Lankans who flock to the festival, it has connections with
the opposition, with Maithri Wickremesinghe having been made a Co-Patron
of the Festival with Yasmine Gooneratne. Since she was then a
comparatively junior lecturer at Kelaniya University, it was clear that
Dobbs wanted her political rather than aesthetic patronage.
But she also perhaps helped to introduce another dimension to the
event, which was the presence of the self-proclaimed Human Rights
Defenders with whom she was closely associated. Each year there is an
event (at least one, often more) at which a collection of these
characters unite to lambast the Government in their various ways.
I was in fact asked to one in 2008, where Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu
and Sanjana Hattotuwa held forth in their usual fashion. This was on
language policy, if I recollect aright, and I suspect the organizers had
intended to accuse the Government of being monolingual and chauvinistic.
My revelation of the manner in which this Government had, for the first
time, made bilingualism compulsory for new public servants, came as a
shock. Understandably enough, I have not been invited again.
Literary skills
Most tellingly, the session was chaired by Rama Mani, the darling
then of the chattering classes, whose claim to literary skills lay in
the writing of execrable romantic poetry.
Amusingly, since her double dealing was being exposed at the time,
she took advantage of the Festival to get people to sign a petition in
her favour, through false pretences as the then Head of the UN’s
Regional Office said to me in writing, when I pointed out how
inappropriate had been his rushing to her defence.
I could quite understand then the angst expressed in ‘Groundviews’ at
the apparent attempt of the Reporters to do down the Festival (though I
hasten to add that Sanjana now seems more balanced and was not as
involved in the Sarath Fonseka nonsense as his erstwhile mentor). But I
think he need not worry, since the Festival will go ahead. Indeed, I
believe that, for the NGO groupies, this year’s star attraction will be
Sunila Abeysekera, who had a similar role during Louise Arbour’s visit
in 2007. The Reporters meanwhile will derive much publicity from those
writers who do not show up.
Political views
I gather that amongst them will be Kiran Desai and Orhan Pamuk. The
reasons for them not appearing are not entirely clear, but doubtless
there will be publicity to the effect that they have joined in
condemnation of the Sri Lankan Government. I am sorry for those
attending that Pamuk will not be there, since he is one of the most
impressive writers in the world today, but I suspect, given his
political views, that he would have been easy to get to and sadly we do
not have the same capacity to communicate as those opposed to us have.
More serious is whether this will contribute to the feelings that are
supposed to be roused against us. I believe Government is aware of
potential problems and my former Minister has been tasked to reproduce
the role he fulfilled so well for several years. He and the present
Foreign Minister in combination will be a tremendous force, as
Ambassador Jayatilleka showed when he would invite them in turn to
address relevant bodies. I suspect however that, to ensure maximum
impact, they will need to involve Dayan again in their deliberations, as
well as their activities, though that should not be too difficult since
he is now resident in Paris as our Ambassador. |