Opportunity for the UNP
The
latest shenanigans by International Crisis Group to place Sri Lanka on
the dock should be viewed by every patriotic, peace loving citizen of
this country as an attempt to prevent normality returning to Sri Lanka.
It appears as if the job of the International Crisis Group is to keep
the world in perpetual crisis and hence when crisis troubled lands come
to an end the ICG goes to explore ways and means of continuing the
crisis
If the whole point in the proposed ICG exercise is to stop killing of
innocent civilians in Sri Lanka, the ICG can be relieved now since the
killings took place during the conflict which is now over.
During the conflict, the lines of accountability could not be
established clearly and the parties to the conflict killed often in self
defence.
But now that that horrific chapter is over, the Army has withdrawn
from civilian areas, emergency has been relaxed, accountability for
human rights violations have been established and there is law and order
in all parts of the country.
Louise Arbour |
Ranil Wickremesinghe |
All this was accomplished by the present Government and the
Government brought that killing spree to an end.
Then why is the ICG nit picking with Government in power? Is it not
pleased with the Government for ending that killing spree in Sri Lanka?
This is the only Government that held its own against the Tiger menace
that killed nearly 100,000 people in Sri Lanka during the past 34 years.
All previous Governments gave into Tiger antics and buckled under
pressure and hence the country could not see an end to the conflict.
Civilian killings took place during the entirety of this drawn out
conflict under every regime starting from JR Jayewardene.
The most number of civilian deaths were reported during Chandrika
Bandaranaike’s time. But then, why is the ICG targeting ‘war crimes’
only against the present regime?
The ICG wants to prosecute only the leaders of the present regime for
‘war crimes’ and not the past regimes.
This is because there is a difference between the present regime and
the previous ones. The present regime established peace whereas the
previous ones, for all their turmoil, could not do so.
Hence the ICG does not seem to like a stable Government that can
maintain peace in Sri Lanka. It wishes to put the men in the present
regime in the dock so that the country will slip back to anarchy again!
There is yet another problem the ICG is faced with in the
international arena.
Now after the Sri Lankan experience all States facing with terrorism
have adopted a tough stance against terrorism in their respective
countries. Such an attitude probably will help some Governments crush
terrorism and establish more stable Governments in those countries.
This is the biggest worry the ICG is facing at the moment and hence
they should do everything to ensure that other poor countries besotted
by terrorism will not take Sri Lanka as an example!
Thus this agenda of the ICG should now be clear to the people in Sri
Lanka, at least to those who are not blinded by fanatic party loyalties.
Who is the citizen in this country who can subscribe to an international
mechanism that seeks to prosecute war heroes of this country who ended
the 34 year misery?
The UNP however has been following a quaint policy with regard to the
international forces that have attempted to destabilize Sri Lanka over
the past few years. The moronic leadership of the present UNP in its
myopic chicanery has opposed the State of Sri Lanka more than the
Government policies.
As a result the UNP has become an anti-national party. Today the
party vote base is down to 29 percent and even that 29 percent is due to
the party loyalists who believe that the UNP still has policies of DS
and Dudley. But the present UNP still thinks it is more acceptable to
the ‘international community’ and hence it should follow that
‘international line’ and continue to be anti-national.
However, the UNP should remember that Sri Lanka is a democracy and
people in this country have rejected this anti-national line of the UNP
quite consistently. The ordinary people have already realized the
insidious ways and dubious agendas of this so-called ‘international
community’ even though the present UNP is yet to.
But yet it is better late than never for the UNP and if it wishes to
remain in national politics it may now have to change this
‘anti-national’ and ‘international’ policy sooner rather than later. For
this the UNP can make use of the present crisis situation spawned by the
ICG with its proposal to investigate.
The UNP leadership, if it can make an honest appraisal of the events
in Sri Lanka should know that this whole attempt by the ICG is a ‘joke
gone too far’. If there was an international inquiry into the UNP crimes
during 88/89 era, the present UNP Leader would have been one of the
first to be docked.
The UNP should therefore pronounce its position on this proposed ICG
attempt to discredit Sri Lanka with a patriotic stand, eschewing
political chicanery and ‘anti nationalism’.
The question however is does the present UNP has the courage to take
such a stand disregarding the patronization it receives, fiduciary and
other, from the international forces that seek to destabilize Sri Lanka?
[email protected] |