Is Nepal peace at risk after death of former PM?
Gopal Sharma
Nepal’s former Prime Minister Girija Prasad Koirala, who chaperoned
the nation’s transition from a monarchy to republic, died at the
weekend, in what has been called a loss for a fragile peace with former
Maoist rebels.
Following are some questions and answers about possible risks to the
peace process, which Koirala helped start in 2006 to end a civil war
that killed more than 13,000 people.
WHY IS NEPAL IMPORTANT?
Nepal’s Prime Minister Madhav Kumar Nepal lays the national flag
over the body of Girija Prasad Koirala in Kathmandu on March 21.
Koirala, who brokered the peace deal that ended a bloody 10-year
civil war, died on March 20 aged 85, after a long illness. AFP |
Seen as a buffer between rivals India and China, Nepal has
traditionally been under New Delhi’s sphere of influence. India provides
Nepal all its fuel and most military equipment and exerts huge clout
over its politics. Many Nepalis resent this. The Maoists also seek to
undermine India by cozying up to China.
For China, Nepal is seen as crucial to the security of Tibet. Nepal
is traditionally a crossing point for Tibetan refugees.
Beijing seeks support from the Nepali Government in controlling
20,000 Tibetan exiles based in the Himalayan nation, who often protest
against Chinese policies in their homeland.
WHAT IS THE PEACE PROCESS?
Under the peace deal, Nepal held elections in 2008 for a special
constituent assembly meant to prepare a new constitution. It also
abolished the 239-year-old monarchy, fulfilling two major demands of the
Maoists during the conflict which began in 1996. But two other
conditions seen as crucial for lasting peace are yet to be fulfilled:
More than 19,000 former Maoist guerrillas housed in U.N.-monitored camps
need to be integrated and rehabilitated; and the assembly must prepare a
new constitution before May 28.
WHY IS KOIRALA’S DEATH A POSSIBLE RISK TO PEACE?
Koirala was trying to forge a consensus among all parties to settle
the future of the Maoist army and draft the constitution. The Maoists,
who quit the coalition government in a conflict with the president over
the firing of the army chief last year, were hoping to convince Koirala
to set up a national unity government under their leadership. They say
they were unfairly forced out of power.
His death leaves the Maoists worried and ever more suspicious of the
remaining coalition partners, raising the risk of a prolonged period of
political uncertainty.
WHAT COULD HAPPEN NOW?
In all probability, the assembly will miss the May 28 deadline
because it is yet to agree on whether to adopt a parliamentary or a
presidential Government, or how a federal system will distribute
resources.
Experts say the interim constitution can be extended for another six
months and that all parties will likely agree to finish drafting the new
constitution within that period.
Another strong possibility involves Nepal being placed under
emergency rule, handing all powers to the president until the new
constitution is written. In such a case, the Maoists will likely try to
paralyse the governmment through huge street protests.
The possibility of a return to war is highly unlikely. Maoist Chief
Prachanda has said the group will not take up arms again but will
capture power if the Government failed to deliver on peace and the new
constitution.
Still, there is heavy public pressure on political parties and the
Maoists to work together to bring peace to Nepal.
Reuters |