Rethink of relations
The Hatoyama Government is keen to
end the US military presence in the country and chart a new foreign
policy course with focus on Asia.
JOHN CHERIAN
After the ouster of the long-ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP)
from power last year, relations between Japan and the United States do
not seem as cosy as they used to be. The new Prime Minister, Yukio
Hatoyama, and his Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) swept to power on the
promise of reorienting the country's domestic and foreign policy. On the
campaign trail, the opposition focussed particularly on the continued
presence of the US military on Japanese territory and the continuance of
unequal treaties dating to the Second World War.
The DPJ promised to end decades of 'passive' behaviour in dealings
with the US Hatoyama, after taking over as Prime Minister, showed that
he was serious about Japan following an Asia-oriented foreign policy.
His Government is giving special emphasis to a strong relationship with
China, India and other Asian countries.
On January 19, the 50th anniversary of the Japan-US security treaty
was commemorated in Tokyo. Japan and the US signed the military pact in
1951, and it was revised in 1960. The 1951 treaty had a clause that
allowed the US to intervene in case of 'large-scale internal riots and
disturbance in Japan'.
|
Yukio Hatoyama |
Robert Gates |
The revised treaty removed the clause but retained many of the
controversial 'secret clauses', including the sailing in of nuclear
armed American navy ships into Japanese territorial waters despite the
fact that Japan's Constitution bans the presence of nuclear weapons on
its territory. One of the clandestine clauses made Japan pay for the
maintenance of US bases.
On the occasion of the anniversary, Hatoyama stressed the importance
of the security pact for peace and stability in the region even as
hectic behind-the-scenes diplomatic activity went on to decide the fate
of the US' Futenma air base in Okinawa. Indications are that the
Hatoyama Government is keen to end the US military presence there.
The Obama administration has taken a tough stance on the issue,
insisting that US presence in Okinawa is crucial for the security of the
East Asian region.
Okinawa is home to 75 percent of the 53,000 US troops based in Japan.
The Obama administration signalled that it could backtrack on an earlier
$26-billion deal involving the transfer of 6,000 US troops from Okinawa
to Guam if the Hatoyama administration decided to close the air base.
The deal, agreed four years ago, also involved handing back to Japan
valuable real estate in thickly populated Okinawa city.
In November last year, US Defence Secretary Robert Gates warned Japan
that it would face 'serious consequences' if the new Government did not
honour the commitments on the bases given by the former Government.
During his visit, Gates loudly lobbied for an extension of the military
bases agreement. The Japanese media were openly critical of Gates,
describing the Defence Secretary as a 'bully'. But since then, both
sides have adopted a more diplomatic stance.
On the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the security treaty, a
joint statement was issued by the US Defence and State Secretaries and
the Japanese Defence and Foreign Ministers. The statement "endorsed
ongoing efforts to maintain the deterrent capabilities in a changing
strategic landscape, including appropriate stationing of US forces,
while reducing the impact of bases on local communities, including
Okinawa, thereby strengthening security and ensuring the alliance
remains the anchor of regional stability".
However, since then, popular sentiment in Japan seems to have shifted
irrevocably against the U.S. military presence. A plan to relocate the
Okinawa base on Japanese soil received a setback in the last week of
January. The former LDP government had proposed four years ago that the
base be shifted to the northern city of Nago, also on the island of
Okinawa. But in the recent municipal elections in Nago, the candidate
opposed to the relocation of the US air base won a resounding victory.
He has since said there was no question of the base being relocated to
Nago.
Hatayoma has diplomatically indicated that the ideal thing for the US
to do is to shift the base out of Japan altogether. The DPJ's key
coalition partner, the Social Democratic Party (SDP), insists that the
US base must be located outside Japanese territory. It has even
threatened to withdraw from the Government if the Government does not
support its position.
The recent revelations of secret security pacts with the US have
inflamed public opinion. The Japanese Foreign Minister has appointed a
team of scholars to delve into the Foreign Ministry's archives to track
down secret documents relating to security ties with the US.
The issue has become an emotive one after it became clear that the
Japanese state used its enormous powers to punish for perjury a
journalist who had, in 1971, exposed the secret military clauses in the
leading Japanese newspaper The Mainichi Shimbun. The reporter, Takichi
Nishiyama, now 79, was the first to reveal the existence of four secret
pacts. In 1978, the Japanese Supreme Court held Nishiyama guilty of
obtaining state secrets.
By 2000, the US itself had started declassifying documents relating
to the secret agreements. And four years ago, a senior Japanese diplomat
who had testified against Nishiyama confessed that he had lied under
oath. Japanese Foreign Minister Katsuya Okada said his Government was
determined to find out the truth about the secret pacts. He said the
move should not be construed as anti-American. He emphasized that it was
'extremely important' for democracy that people be aware of the truth.
Exposing the truth and rectifying past wrongs, he said, could strengthen
the alliance with the US.
Japan-China ties
It is not only the 'bases issue' that gives the Us reason to worry
about Japan's future course. Since Hatoyama became Prime Minister in
late 2009, ties with China, painted as a traditional rival of Japan by
the West and right-wing Japanese politicians, have been strengthened.
Visits by high-level delegations from both countries have been taking
place virtually every month.
There is talk of Hatoyama planning a visit to Nanjing for the
anniversary of the 1937 massacre of civilians under Japanese occupation.
Previous Japanese governments tended to gloss over the incident.
According to reports, if such a visit materialises, Chinese President Hu
Jintao will reciprocate with a visit to Nagasaki, where he would pledge
his country's peaceful intentions.
However, not everybody in Hatoyama's Cabinet shares his vision of an
Asia-centric policy. Defence Minster Toshimi Kitazawa is said to be in
favour of maintaining the close security links with the US.
He recently appointed Yukio Okamoto as an adviser in the Ministry.
Okamoto, known for his pro-American views, was a key adviser to several
Prime Ministers of LDP Governments. He recently said China was not 'a
friendly country; in military matters and that the threat from North
Korea should be taken seriously.
Many Japanese still seem to favour retaining the 'nuclear umbrella'
the US has provided for the last 60 years.
But in the past four months, some of the decisions taken by the DPJ-led
government have not been looked upon favourably in Washington. These
include the withdrawal of Japan's naval forces from the Indian Ocean,
where they were deployed to provide non-combat support for US troops in
Afghanistan. At the same time, Tokyo announced a $5-billion aid plan for
Afghanistan. The new Government has talked about plans for setting up an
East Asian community. No role is being contemplated for the US in this
Asian version of the European Union.
It is obvious that there is a serious rethink under way in Japan on
the rationale for continuing with the unequal relationship with the US
America's military blunders in West Asia and Afghanistan, coupled with
its economic decline, have no doubt forced this reappraisal in Japan and
among other close allies of the US.
The Frontline |