The Dasa Raja Dharma: Handbook, insurance policy and litmus test
devices; they did not win any votes and may have even turned off a
few loyalists. Some of it was classy and even if they didn’t engineer
defection nevertheless generated some laughs. I am thinking of the
cartooned spoof of Saheli Gamage’s song ‘Maharajaneni’, praising
President Mahinda Rajapaksa for comprehensively eliminating the
terrorist threat posed by Prabhakaran and the LTTE.
The visuals could have been crafted better, but the lyrics, voice and
music were perfect for the task. It got me thinking about the matter of
‘kingship’, royalty, the popularity of the song, the fact that the
sentiments did not mesh well with the notion of participatory democracy
(we are after all not a monarchy officially) etc.
Mahinda Rajapaksa, when he referred to the famous
observation/directive of Arahat Mahinda (to King Devanampiyatissa),
claiming that he was not owner but mere custodian of the land and the
people, and a temporary one at that, probably didn’t envisage that he
would be hailed as king less than four years later. It all began when an
old Tamil woman who had escaped from the clutches of the LTTE referred
to Rajapaksa as ‘Raju’ (rajuta kiyanna). A few days later, Prabakaran
was no more and the LTTE, contrary to all prediction and dream, was
wiped out. Then came the posters, the cut-outs and Saheli’s song. The
President went along with it for a while, but when things started going
overboard, he put his foot down.
People like to be kings. Some believe they are kings, often because
they misread the meaning of ‘raja yogas’.
The fact remains that king-aspiration does not necessarily deliver
crown and wearing crown does not necessarily confer royalty. Mahinda may
not have wanted to be king, but he was hailed as one and in a sense that
conferring was re-endorsed on January 26, 2010.
He is not a man who has lost his humility and I am sure he would not
be averse to admitting that even if he were king, he is far from the
perfect monarch. At some level he must recognize his mortality and
imperfections, for this is the man who told us in 2005 not to sing
hosannas for him but instead point out error and suggest remedy.
I was thinking about kings and royalty, citizens and subjects,
governance and rule and it didn’t take long for me to realize that the
definitive text book was written, so to speak, over 2500 years ago by
Siddhartha Gauthama: The Dasa Raja Dharma, the ten-point framework for
rulers. Each tenet is a book, if one wants to expand on the basic
principle, a doctoral dissertation in fact and a single article running
into 1000 words or less cannot do justice to this amazing handbook for
the ruler.
This is it, the ‘nutshell version of good governance’:
1. Dana - liberality,
generosity, charity.
2. Sila - a high and moral
character.
3. Pariccaga - sacrificing
everything for the good of the people. 4. Ajjava - honesty and
integrity.
5. Maddava - kindness and
gentleness.
6. Tapa - austerity of
habits.
7. Akkodha - freedom from
envy, ill-will, enmity.
8. Avihimsa -
non-violence.
9. Khanti - patience,
forbearance, tolerance, understanding.
10. Avirodha -
non-opposition, non-obstruction.
All leaders, not just kings and presidents, would do well to reflect
on the above 10 principles and to extrapolate and apply them as
appropriate. It is essentially a checklist when testing/predicting
‘goodness of fit’ of any proposal or policy. It is therefore an
insurance policy.
It must be remembered also that the Dasa Raja Dharma is not just for
rulers, but for the ruled as well, for we can assess the worth of any
piece of legislation, any act, any proposal, any program against these
criteria and once this is done we will be more confident in applauding
or blackballing.
It is hard, no doubt, but then again who said ruling was going to be
easy? We don’t expect our rulers to be Arahats but we certainly expect
them not to be brigands or rasthiyaadukaarayas. The Dasa Raja Dharma is
a mirror. Each of us, leaders and the led, can look at this mirror and
check the distance between self-image and reality. We can hold it
against each and every politician, those in power and those who aspire
to political office and the three dimensional man/woman inside the
two-dimensional version that smiles at us from city wall will no doubt
jump out in all his/her primary colours of being.
We could do all this, but it is more important that Mahinda Rajapaksa
does it. He is after all The Ruler, the all-powerful Executive
President, a man who came before us with a manifesto and returned home
with mandate. He will be challenged at every turn. There will be
countless opportunities to slip. At every step along the way from here
to the ‘there’ that he envisages, Mahinda Rajapaksa will have some
people on his side, but if he wants to have more people with him, then
the more efficient way of getting about it would be to choose as his
constant companion the Dasa Raja Dharma, for it was authored for him by
one of the most insightful political scientists the world has ever known
and one of the most compassionate too: Siddhartha Gauthama.
If I was Mahinda Rajapaksa and had to choose between an army of
advisors and this brief note of 10 simple and simply profound points, I
would not pick the former. Mahinda Rajapaksa is a practical man. He can
choose to be wise(r) during his second term as President.
[email protected]
|