Development through sacrifice
The President was
on a State visit to Vietnam last week. Many a commentator
reporting the visit said that we could learn a lesson from
Vietnam. True. Let us see what lessons we could draw.
Vietnam is a country that faced more than three decades of
armed aggression by imperial powers. Even after the country was
liberated it stood divided since the French held on to its
south. Even after the ignominious defeat of the French following
the epic battle of Dien Bien Phu and their evacuation the United
States stepped in to replace French occupation.
The Vietnamese did not give up or surrender. They fought the
world Super Power relentlessly in face of carpet bombing which
scorched out entire villages. They matched the superior
technology of the United States' war machine with innovation,
skill and international solidarity. The US lost one third of its
Air Force in Vietnam. It taught the world a lesson. That is, no
nation united in its resolve to defend its sovereignty can be
defeated. It is not by resolve alone that they won. They won
through sacrifice, immense sacrifice.
Following the unification of the country after liberation,
Vietnam has developed fast. It is one of the fastest growing
economies. There again it is due to pragmatism and sacrifice.
Development does not come in a platter. It has to be achieved
through hard work. It comes through sacrifice. To speak in
economic parlance, there should be sufficient national savings
for an economic take off. In Sri Lanka domestic savings are
still low, somewhere near 20 percent of the GDP. It should be
increased at least up to 30 percent.
If you study the success stories of many individuals or their
families you could see how much thrift and savings have
contributed to their success. What is true of individuals is
also true of countries or nations.
If Sri Lanka is to develop we should give up two things. The
first is the dependency syndrome or the mentality that we should
depend on foreign aid under whatever conditions. The pleadings
and accusations on the GSP Plus issue betray this mentality.
This does not mean the refusal of aid but refusal to accept it
as the main means of development. We cannot develop the country
by charity alone. And charity nowadays also comes at a price.
The second is consumerism. It is consumerism and the
advertising fraternity which decides our priorities. We should
decide our priorities - whether we should go for a motor vehicle
and a home theatre system for each family or whether we should
provide basic needs of life for a decent living for all.
We should also give up all ostentation. How could we stick on
to ostentation and extravagance when several thousands are still
in relief villages and the economic crisis is threatening the
livelihood of thousands?
Extravagance here also means the extravagant use of time,
which is none other than idling or less profitable use of time.
Profitable, not necessarily in the monetary sense. We are poor
time managers. How much would our country develop if each of us
does at least the stipulated eight hours of work honestly and
conscientiously?
Small is potent
Small is
beautiful, the family planners are fond of saying. China
followed this policy to the hilt. Now it has found itself faced
with a manpower shortage in future. That is besides the point we
want to drive in here. Small may be beautiful or not. But is
certainly potent. Take for example the atom, the smallest
chemical particle. The potency of atomic fusion needs no
introduction.
Bulk is not always helpful. Taken in small doses medicine
will cure many a disease and is life saving. On the other hand,
taken in bulk it would threaten life. Even a simple Paracetamol
capsule testifies to the truth of this statement. The notorious
cyanide capsule that adorned the necks of two-legged Tigers too
vouched for the potency of things that are small.
If one examines legends one is reminded of David and Goliath
where the small outwits the big. Here are also many examples of
modern day Goliaths and modern day Davids too. Being inhabitants
of a small island, it is refreshing to reflect of the potency of
all that is small. |