Aney,
please don’t ‘represent’ me!
Elections are essentially processes which allow people to select
representatives. The would-be representative, therefore, spends a lot of
time, energy and money, trying to convince the voter that he/she would
be the better representative, would air their concerns at relevant
forums and do everything possible to redress grievance. What happens
thereafter we really don’t have to talk about, do we? But that’s not my
concern.
The recent spate of provincial-level elections got me thinking about
this business of representation. Who is representing me, I asked myself.
As a resident of Colombo, I am (supposed to be) represented in the
Colombo Municipal Council (CMC). So too in the Western Provincial
Council (WPC). I am represented, it follows, in Parliament by Colombo
District members. And by the President.
In addition to all these electioneering types, there are those who
believe they represent that conveniently undefined and undifferentiated
thing called ‘civil society’.
These cats really go to town with this ‘representation’ business,
posing off as the ‘Voice of Reason’, the ‘Ethical’, the ‘Good’, the ones
with ‘conscience’ and ‘social responsibility’. They are quite thick with
self-congratulation and it is positively sickening. Most of them are
motivated by elitist visions for Sri Lanka and by narrow political
preferences. They ‘represent’ me (locally and internationally) without
my permission and worse without even my vote. The politician, in
comparison, is pretty transparent and I would pick him/her any day over
the civil-society-rep.
Then there is the media, speaking on my behalf, looking after ‘the
public interest’. Sure, they play an important role, but one is often
mortified by the arrogance that assumes knowledge of the most intimate
concerns of the public; an arrogance which is of course framed in
humanistic and politically-correct language that does little to hide the
political motive that underlines such sentiments.
The truth is I am not even a name or a face to most of my
‘representatives’. If you ask me, I would not be able to name anyone in
the CMC and I can’t really call anyone in the WPC ‘friend’ or even
acquaintance.
Haven’t seen, haven’t talked. Never asked me who I was, never said
‘hello’, they just do in my name whatever they like whether or not it
helps me.
I do know the names of some Colombo District Parliamentarians and
have had occasion to meet one or two of them, but they are all busy
looking after, they say, ‘the national interest’ and can hardly be
expected to do anything about the kudu karayas who jump into my parents’
garden to steal flowers or pinch whatever that’s lying around. ‘Law and
order’ is the business of the police, right?
I am sure some voters, especially those who contribute handsomely to
campaign coffers have an inside track to their representatives’ ears,
and can and do get things done. Of course whether their ‘concerns’ are
about mal-horu or something else, I have no way of knowing. Maybe I
don’t try hard enough. Actually I don’t mind my representatives not
attending to problems that are specific to me; as long as they do things
that benefit the larger collective of voters. I don’t see much of that
happening either. The ‘I did this’ boards are, we all know, several
times ‘larger’ (metaphorically speaking) than what he/she actually
‘did’.
I’ve come to think that I’d rather have no representative than have
hundreds who really don’t give a damn about me except during that brief
period when they are up for re-election.
Sri Lanka, I believe, has far too many representatives than is good
for the country’s general health. There is so much overlap that it makes
not only for squabbles over securing credit (for whatever is done) and
an enormous waste of money and other resources. I am sure that very few
if any representative is aware of the lines that demarcate his/her
jurisdiction when it comes to ‘doing’. There is a lot of trespassing,
some of it due to good-hearted ignorance and a lot because territory is
everything to the politician given his/her political ambitions.
This is true from the first-term pradeshiya sabhika to the seasoned
and regularly elected Cabinet Minister.
To put up your name board, you have to have ‘work’. Well, to make
bucks, you have to have ‘projects’, but that’s another article
altogether. Representatives are falling over each other and biting into
each other’s behinds to get ‘work’, this we know. In the absence of a
streamlined system of responsibilities and an enforcing mechanism to
keep predatory representatives from encroaching on someone else’s turf,
all this, unfortunately, is ‘all natural’. And this, mind you, is
without factoring in the inevitable exacerbation of election-related
violence and vandalism.
We see all this all the time, before and after elections and during
election campaigns.
Before J.R. Jayewardene brought in the proportional representation
system the word ‘manaapaya’ referred to preference.
Today it is a cuss-word. Murmur the word manaapaya and ask someone
give a one-word response and nine out of 10 would no doubt respond
‘poraya’.
At the end of the day, the whole system seems to be an excellent
validation of the dictum ‘too many cooks spoil the soup’. The wastage,
mis-representation and even non-representation that the excessive number
of representatives produces, the inefficiency and the mindless swagger
it yields, it seems imperative that radical reform is necessary in the
entire electoral system.
We are all aware that an Electoral Reform Commission was set up under
the chairmanship of Dinesh Gunawardena, Urban Development and Sacred
Area Development Minister. Much was expected. Now it seems that petty
politicking might sink the whole exercise. The recommendations would
clearly serve to mitigate the violence and insufferable lunacy that the
manaapa poraya produces. They fall short, however, of addressing the
fundamental deficiencies related to ‘representation’, the situation
where we are represented by so many that we are not represented at all.
It is quite depressing, actually. At the end of the day, I want to
say, ‘please, please, don’t represent me; I am fine, really’. Makes me
want to say, ‘udau epa; wadath epa’ (I don’t need any help, just don’t
harass me)! |