UNP should act in national interest - Freedom Watch
Western Provincial Council UNP Member Srinath Perera PC, at a news
conference held on behalf of the UNP warned the Government from bashing
the West. He should in the first place urge some amongst the western
countries to stop bashing Sri Lanka on unfounded allegations or by
refusing visas to high profile citizens or officials.
He should also urge pro-LTTE elements operating from western
countries not to intimidate or mislead their masters, Freedom Watch said
in a release.
Freedom Watch is a voluntary group of Sri Lankans seeking to
participate in promoting greater political awareness on current issues
of interest in the country.
If Srinath Perera was speaking on behalf of the country’s major
opposition party, he should urge the UNP to act in the broader national
interest and protest against some western orchestrated attempts
including Channel 4, from misleading the world on false allegations
against the country, it added.
The release: “The UNP should realize that this is an important post
war period, where the Government needs to consolidate its achievements
on the war front.
They should not contribute to justifying these false allegations by
accusing the Government of West-bashing when it is the country that is
being sought to be bashed and scandalized by pro-LTTE groups operating
from the West.
To say, Sri Lanka is engaged in West bashing is a dubious attempt to
put the West against the country, which will destroy the credibility of
the UNP, amongst the people.
This is a time when the main opposition party should seek to
strengthen itself as a credible opposition in the eyes of the people. A
strong opposition is a necessary component for the country’s democracy
to flourish. But for that, the parties in the opposition must act in the
national interest and not as supporters of those elements trying
wrongfully to strangle Sri Lanka.
Srinath Perera has referred to the British High Commission inviting
the Attorney-General Mohan Peiris for an interview before granting a
visa. If that was a wrong practice by the British, Perera should have
pointed out to the British Embassy, who was at fault.
If it was an act of arrogance by the British Mission he should have
immediately condemned it. It would well be even an innocent act of the
British High Commissioner who may have wanted to make use of this
opportunity to exchange views with the Sri Lankan dignitary.
Perera has also referred to the ‘shabby treatment’ to UN and EU
officials. No one in the UN or EU has made any such allegations. Of
course, the country is aware of some in international outfits who are
acting outside their mandate.
Everyone in this country would wish to appeal to the likes of Perera
not to put the West against the country by blaming the Government but to
act in the broader national interest of preventing external
interferences on behalf of pro-LTTE groups.” |