Evaluating McNamara
Pranay Gupte
He was always Bomber Bob, Bob McNamara - Robert Strange McNamara -
the man who, perhaps more than any other, was responsible for the
killing of millions in Vietnam and Cambodia more than four decades ago.
|
Robert
McNamara. AFP |
Of course, much later in life, well after those insane years of the
Indochina conflict in which the United States participated without any
sense of history or sensibility of local cultures, McNamara would
publicly express some regret over his role as Defence Secretary in the
administrations of Presidents John Fitzgerald Kennedy and Lyndon Baines
Johnson from 1961 to 1968. Regret, but never remorse.
McNamara died on July 6 at the age of 93. By conventional criteria,
it was a long life of accomplishment. A Californian by birth, he went on
to obtain an MBA from the Harvard School of Business.
Hired by the Ford Motor Company, he was one of the 10 so-called “whiz
kids,” smart young executives who accelerated the automobile
manufacturer’s fortunes. McNamara was widely considered to have invented
a form of system analysis in business, something that he eventually
applied to government - something that, to this day, is known as policy
analysis in the corridors of power, a method through which the obtaining
and allocation of resources for decision-making is quantified and
streamlined.
He took that system with him when President Johnson named him
President of the World Bank in 1968; there had been rumours that
McNamara had had differences with Pentagon military leaders and that, in
fact, he was leaning toward ending the bombing of Indochina, while U.S.
Secretary of State Dean Rusk, already a hawk, was becoming increasingly
hawkish.
Moving from the Pentagon to the World Bank was as if the villainous
Darth Vader of George Lucas’ Star Wars suddenly had a metamorphosis -
McNamara became the benign Luke Skywalker.
He travelled around the globe, proclaiming his concern for the
dispossessed and the disease-ridden. He committed vast sums of
development money to the very nations whose societal fabrics he had been
earlier responsible for shredding.
He worked vigorously to draw attention to the endemic problem of
river blindness, especially in Sub-Saharan countries in Africa. He took
the late Mahbub ul Haq, the Pakistani economist, as his developmental
guru, and initiated the publication of the much-acclaimed annual World
Development Reports. He transformed the World Bank from a bloated
behemoth into a bureaucracy with a heart. He was always running, always
peripatetic.
Perhaps McNamara did this, I think, because he seemed to be always
trying to expunge his war days from his conscience. During an interview
that I did with him, well after he had retired from the World Bank,
McNamara bristled when I asked him about Vietnam. “That was an
unfortunate war, and it’s best relegated to history,” he said to me. I
don’t think there was a trace of remorse in his voice; he spoke as he
always did - firmly, crisply, and to the point.
When Susan Tolchin, a Professor of political science at George Mason
University near Washington, reviewed Deborah Shapley’s extraordinary
book, Promise and Power: The Life and Times of Robert McNamara, for a
newspaper that I published and edited for a dozen years, The Earth
Times, I was summoned by one of McNamara’s best friends, the Canadian
tycoon Maurice F. Strong.
Strong had been my friend, too, and he was a noted environmentalist
who had been a moral and intellectual supporter of my newspaper.
He tore into me for running Tolchin’s critical review in which she
had recalled McNamara’s heavy-handed conduct during the Indochina years
and his subsequent “conversion on the Road from Damascus - like St.
Paul” during his tenure at the World Bank. “Bob is a good man,” Maurice
Strong told me, his voice quivering. “Your paper shouldn’t be carrying
such criticism of him.” Implicit in what Strong said, of course, was
that some sort of apology was due to McNamara.
Neither Susan Tolchin nor I ever issued such an apology. What for?
Yes, Bob McNamara had served admirably well as the World Bank’s
President, and later as a board member of the Washington Post Company
and the Washington-based liberal think tank, the Brookings Institution.
Yes, he made contributions to philanthropies. And yes, he came out
against George W. Bush’s military adventure in Iraq.
But one’s past is not cleansed so readily. I know that a 93-year-old
man has passed away peacefully in his sleep, and I know that it is
traditional to view such a man’s life through the prism of kindness.
I’m sorry, but I can’t do that. Too many of my friends died in
Indochina. Too many of them came home without limbs. Their lives never
got to be celebrated in the manner in which Robert McNamara was feted in
his later years. That’s why, for me at least, he will always be Bomber
Bob. (Courtesy: The Hindu)
The writer is a veteran international journalist and author who has
worked for The New York Times, Newsweek International, and Forbes.
|